there4eyeM
unlicensed metaphysician
- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,973
- 5,507
- 280
If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
THAT is NOT a true statement. IF you have the money and are NOT a wacko you can OWN anything you want.If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
Because it doesn't mean this.
The 2A is there to protect the militia from the federal govt.
Individuals are allowed weapons so the militia has a ready supply of weapons (keep arms)
Individuals are allowed to be in the militia so the militia has a ready supply of personnel to use those weapons (bear arms)
Or better said, the feds can't prevent individuals, before due process, from being able to have arms. They can prevent certain types of arms, just as long as individuals can get militia type weaponry.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
the right of the PEOPLE, not the right of the MILITIA, shall not be infringed
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
the right of the PEOPLE, not the right of the MILITIA, shall not be infringed
So... who said anything about the right of the militia? I can't see it.
If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
because you can poke your eye out with a switch blade, we all know why sawed off shot guns had to be made illegal.If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
They shouldn't be.
There is NO requirement that one belong to a militia to keep own and possess firearms. Each State is free to create a militia separate and distinct from the National Guard. You see the law states that the Fed can federalize part of a States militia. And that is the National Guard. Each State is free to create a militia that is not federalized.Where is this militia?
Because, it Only and merely means; Only well regulated militias are necessary to the security of a free State and may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for the several United States or the Union.If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
Because, it Only and merely means; Only well regulated militias are necessary to the security of a free State and may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for the several United States or the Union.If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
Go ahead....have a chuckle at yourselves. It'll do ya good.
Go ahead....have a chuckle at yourselves. It'll do ya good.
I really could care less what an Aussie thinks. He's also wrong on most of the facts. He is certainly wrong that there have been no massacres.
I always have a point; the People are the Militia. Only well regulated Militias of the People (who are the Militia) are declared necessary to the security of a free State, not the entirety of the Militias of the United States.Because, it Only and merely means; Only well regulated militias are necessary to the security of a free State and may not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for the several United States or the Union.If the 2nd means no limitations on armed citizens, why are knives controlled and limited?
You might have a point if it gave the right to the militias, instead of the people.