Ken Paxton announces voter fraud charges against county judge, and 5 others.

[HeyNorm]

Don't need a law degree to see that everything he has done was to please trump.

Ohhhhh, so now we can’t trust the legal system.

 

[Concerned American]

So typical.

What ever you say donkey--its YOUR day. LMAO

World Donkey Day - Bing

Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.

www.bing.com

 

[Dragonlady]

It does belie the ever so confident proclamations that there was absolutely no fraud at all.

No one ever claimed that at all. What has been said is that there is no significant amount of voter fraud, such that it would affect the outcome of an election.

Quite frankly, it’s difficult to believe that a felon like Ken Paxton is doing anything within the limits of the law.

 

[BULLDOG]

Your puny little Dem brain would overheat. Just sit in the back and relax while team Trump cleans up the giant Dem mess kid.

So you got nothing. As expected

 

[BULLDOG]

Ohhhhh, so now we can’t trust the legal system.

What does that have to do with the legal system?

 

[SweetTea]

A few votes are fraudulent in any election involving millions of people. Always have been--always will be. No where near enough to sway the outcome. i know there has been no proof of widespread fraud. You've been looking for it for years.

Would voter disenfranchisement be “widespread” if voter id was required across the nation? How many people who are eligible to vote don’t have an ID? Funny, but I hear the left saying that every vote counts and it would be unfair to “disenfranchise” someone that didn’t have an ID.

We can’t realistically determine how many fraudulent votes are cast as that would require each vote to be individually investigated. We do not have the time nor the effort to do that, thus the beauty of the cheat. If we don’t catch it on the front end, we can’t realistically prove it afterwards. Republicans want to prevent it from happening. Democrats have no interest in that approach. Reasonable people understand exactly why that is.

 

[BULLDOG]

Would voter disenfranchisement be “widespread” if voter id was required across the nation? How many people who are eligible to vote don’t have an ID? Funny, but I hear the left saying that every vote counts and it would be unfair to “disenfranchise” someone that didn’t have an ID.

We can’t realistically determine how many fraudulent votes are cast as that would require each vote to be individually investigated. We do not have the time nor the effort to do that, thus the beauty of the cheat. If we don’t catch it on the front end, we can’t realistically prove it afterwards. Republicans want to prevent it from happening. Democrats have no interest in that approach. Reasonable people understand exactly why that is.

There is no reason to believe that voter fraud is a widespread issue.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You don't know that. You are hoping. After the unbelievable numbers of votes in 2020, your speculation seems less likely with the new evidence. More evidence is being exposed daily. Two postal workers in CO who just pleaded guilty. Six more officials in TX. These coupled with the charges that were made after the 2020 election and dismissed make the possibility seem more likely with each new revelation. Sorry you've spent the last four years with your head in the sand, but there it is.

You got you MAGA asses kicked in 2020 fairly and squarely.

That you can't handle it is your tough nougies.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There is no widespread evidence of voter fraud.

None.

Uh Uh.

Go away.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What ever you say donkey--its YOUR day. LMAO

World Donkey Day - Bing

Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.

www.bing.com

Thank you. We will kick your ass, too.

 

[Concerned American]

You got you MAGA asses kicked in 2020 fairly and squarely.

That you can't handle it is your tough nougies.

Today's not your day donkey--that was yesterday. As was 2020. This is 2025 and there is a new sheriff in town. Winning is great! Tough nougies for you.

 

[leftwinger]

No one ever claimed that at all. What has been said is that there is no significant amount of voter fraud, such that it would affect the outcome of an election.

Quite frankly, it’s difficult to believe that a felon like Ken Paxton is doing anything within the limits of the law.

Uh….350,000 illegal votes in PHX has been said. 109s’ of thousands in ATL. 800K in PA. Ye, there was more than enough “said”, shown, testified by those investigating. You won’t hear it on CNN Canada so SHUP. Courts stalled and blocked any meaningful look into it. It was all a co-ordinated steal. They had to have those 5 “close” states late. So they went all out after midnight to weeks after 04NOV2020.

 

[SeaMajor7]

There is no reason to believe that voter fraud is a widespread issue.

"These are not the droids you are looking for."

 

[leftwinger]

Dirty corrupt NGO register illegals at incoming as “homeless” No ID (as they do with US homeless). They get EBT card (filling out all incoming papers) and sent on their way. Address may be shelter or Shell station. No one was checking millions across states.

Then they flood out mail in ballots to every registered name, intercept and use them to vote Obiden. This is one way they loaded the zuckerboxes at 1AM.

If they want to use mail in….you must drop off inside city building, show ID, on hand one ballot. That would slow the fraud. IMVHO of course.

 

[SweetTea]

There is no reason to believe that voter fraud is a widespread issue.

And there is no reason to believe that a significant number of voters would be disenfranchised by securing our elections with voter id. There is no reason not to further secure elections. If you are correct in your assessment about voter fraud not being widespread, it won't harm Democrats.

 

[SweetTea]

There is no widespread evidence of voter fraud.

None.

Uh Uh.

Go away.

Right, because we don't have the resources to investigate each and every ballot. Don't be stupid.

 

[leftwinger]

In ATL they admitted in Court they did not use the new machine for SIG verification on 187,000 mail in ballots. Translation: too many would have failed. Anything making it into Zucerboxes at 1AM became a legal ballot once out of envelope (PHX also).

In a 12,000 final difference. Uh yes, enough BS went on that could AFFECT the OUTCOME you dumb CNN watching board maggots.//

 

[Concerned American]

Don't be stupid.

That ^^^ is akin to asking the sun not to shine with donkey.

 

[KarsaOrlong]

Lazy eye ken is a criminal. Anyone with a spine wouldn't listen to a word that cockeyed sleaze has to say about anything

 

[my2¢]

Good. So far my attitude in all the election fraud tales has been, put up or shut up. Glad to finally see some action.

According to Paxton’s office, Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho faces three counts of vote harvesting; former county elections administrator Carlos Segura faces one count of evidence tampering; Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza face one count each of vote harvesting; Pearsall Independent School District Trustee Adriann Ramirez faces three counts of vote harvesting; and campaign worker Rosa Rodriguez faces two counts of vote harvesting.

Source