Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The question is where does "personal favor" begin and "acting as chief law enforcement officer" end?1. It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to condition aid to a foreign government on the delivery of personal favors to himself.
I LOVE how Trump’s exoneration has completely unhinged simpleton Dimwingers
I would hardly call it a high crime, but true.Trumpbots are going to cry like little bitches when the next democratic president takes up these newly expanded presidential powers and uses them to actually do some good.
and that 'democratic' president is going to cry like a little girl, when the Republican Speaker uses Pelosi methods to ram a partisan impeachment down his throat.
Been there, done that .... see: Bill Clinton
Big difference.
Clinton actually committed a crime
This is true.I LOVE how Trump’s exoneration has completely unhinged simpleton Dimwingers
Just an FYI:
Donny wasn't exonerated he was acquitted, even though the words themselves are synonyms for each other in common vernacular they are not the same thing from a legal perspective.
That's why Chief Justice Roberts pronounced the President "acquitted" (not "exonerated") after the conclusion of the votes on the two articles of impeachment.
Exoneration Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
This is true.I LOVE how Trump’s exoneration has completely unhinged simpleton Dimwingers
Just an FYI:
Donny wasn't exonerated he was acquitted, even though the words themselves are synonyms for each other in common vernacular they are not the same thing from a legal perspective.
That's why Chief Justice Roberts pronounced the President "acquitted" (not "exonerated") after the conclusion of the votes on the two articles of impeachment.
Exoneration Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
"Exonerated" means that evidence conclusively supports the opposite conclusion than that of the allegations.
.
/-----/Since we're playing a guessing game, I'd say 100%. Now the average of our two guesses would be 50.5%/——/ Adam Shytface couldn’t make the case because he had no evidence of wrong doing.He did each and every one of them. He has in fact admitted to most of them, and most of the senate republicans have admitted he did them as well. They have just decided they are OK with it./—-/ Trump did none of those things you moron.Acquitting trump has set some dangerous precedents. And while the trumps ass kissers think this is a victoiry because their thug was allowed to keep his job, the losers in this scenario are all of us as Americans.
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
In voting to acquit President Trump, the Senate has legitimated legal and moral claims that will not serve America well.
February 5, 2020
The Senate today voted largely along party lines to acquit President Donald Trump on two articles of impeachment. The acquittal, in the simplest sense, is a declaration that the House of Representatives failed to prove its case. But it is also a statement of values by the Senate—an embrace of certain basic propositions about the president’s conduct, the House’s conduct in impeaching him, and its own responsibilities.
At least in those circumstances in which the president and the majority of the Senate are of the same political party, the Senate has adopted the following propositions:
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to condition aid to a foreign government on the delivery of personal favors to himself.
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to demand that a foreign head of state dish dirt on the president’s political opponents—or demand that he make dirt up if none is available to dish.
- For that matter, it is not an impeachable offense for the president to push a foreign law-enforcement agency to investigate a U.S. citizen for conduct no U.S. law-enforcement agency has found to warrant an investigation.
- Abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. The oath he swears to “faithfully execute” his duties and “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” notwithstanding, the president is generally free to use his powers under Article II of the Constitution to benefit himself and harm those he disfavors.
Would you have been OK with it had it been Obama?
Oh.
Quick question. On a scale of 1-100; 1 being no attention and 100 being full attention...what amount of consideration do you believe the average Senator (on both sides of the aisle) gave to the evidence?
I say “1”
Yes. It is used in the sense of a person who is already been convicted.This is true.I LOVE how Trump’s exoneration has completely unhinged simpleton Dimwingers
Just an FYI:
Donny wasn't exonerated he was acquitted, even though the words themselves are synonyms for each other in common vernacular they are not the same thing from a legal perspective.
That's why Chief Justice Roberts pronounced the President "acquitted" (not "exonerated") after the conclusion of the votes on the two articles of impeachment.
Exoneration Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
"Exonerated" means that evidence conclusively supports the opposite conclusion than that of the allegations.
.
Or (in a legal sense) it means a person that has first been convicted of a crime and then later proven innocent by post conviction re-examination or introduction of new evidence.
In either sense Donny case doesn't qualify as "exonerated".
/—-/ Trump did none of those things you moron.Acquitting trump has set some dangerous precedents. And while the trumps ass kissers think this is a victoiry because their thug was allowed to keep his job, the losers in this scenario are all of us as Americans.
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
In voting to acquit President Trump, the Senate has legitimated legal and moral claims that will not serve America well.
February 5, 2020
The Senate today voted largely along party lines to acquit President Donald Trump on two articles of impeachment. The acquittal, in the simplest sense, is a declaration that the House of Representatives failed to prove its case. But it is also a statement of values by the Senate—an embrace of certain basic propositions about the president’s conduct, the House’s conduct in impeaching him, and its own responsibilities.
At least in those circumstances in which the president and the majority of the Senate are of the same political party, the Senate has adopted the following propositions:
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to condition aid to a foreign government on the delivery of personal favors to himself.
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to demand that a foreign head of state dish dirt on the president’s political opponents—or demand that he make dirt up if none is available to dish.
- For that matter, it is not an impeachable offense for the president to push a foreign law-enforcement agency to investigate a U.S. citizen for conduct no U.S. law-enforcement agency has found to warrant an investigation.
- Abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. The oath he swears to “faithfully execute” his duties and “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” notwithstanding, the president is generally free to use his powers under Article II of the Constitution to benefit himself and harm those he disfavors.
Let me correct that for you...Acquitting trump has set some dangerous precedents. And while the trumps ass kissers think this is a victoiry because their thug was allowed to keep his job, the losers in this scenario are all of us as Americans.
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
In voting to acquit President Trump, the Senate has legitimated legal and moral claims that will not serve America well.
February 5, 2020
The Senate today voted largely along party lines to acquit President Donald Trump on two articles of impeachment. The acquittal, in the simplest sense, is a declaration that the House of Representatives failed to prove its case. But it is also a statement of values by the Senate—an embrace of certain basic propositions about the president’s conduct, the House’s conduct in impeaching him, and its own responsibilities.
At least in those circumstances in which the president and the majority of the Senate are of the same political party, the Senate has adopted the following propositions:
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to condition aid to a foreign government on the delivery of personal favors to himself.
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to demand that a foreign head of state dish dirt on the president’s political opponents—or demand that he make dirt up if none is available to dish.
- For that matter, it is not an impeachable offense for the president to push a foreign law-enforcement agency to investigate a U.S. citizen for conduct no U.S. law-enforcement agency has found to warrant an investigation.
- Abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. The oath he swears to “faithfully execute” his duties and “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” notwithstanding, the president is generally free to use his powers under Article II of the Constitution to benefit himself and harm those he disfavors.
You know that's not what those were.I guess you missed Fast and Furious? Perhaps the IRS debacle? You can't have missed the bombing of Doctors Without Borders.Yeah?He did that and more.He did each and every one of them. He has in fact admitted to most of them, and most of the senate republicans have admitted he did them as well. They have just decided they are OK with it./—-/ Trump did none of those things you moron.Acquitting trump has set some dangerous precedents. And while the trumps ass kissers think this is a victoiry because their thug was allowed to keep his job, the losers in this scenario are all of us as Americans.
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
In voting to acquit President Trump, the Senate has legitimated legal and moral claims that will not serve America well.
February 5, 2020
The Senate today voted largely along party lines to acquit President Donald Trump on two articles of impeachment. The acquittal, in the simplest sense, is a declaration that the House of Representatives failed to prove its case. But it is also a statement of values by the Senate—an embrace of certain basic propositions about the president’s conduct, the House’s conduct in impeaching him, and its own responsibilities.
At least in those circumstances in which the president and the majority of the Senate are of the same political party, the Senate has adopted the following propositions:
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to condition aid to a foreign government on the delivery of personal favors to himself.
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to demand that a foreign head of state dish dirt on the president’s political opponents—or demand that he make dirt up if none is available to dish.
- For that matter, it is not an impeachable offense for the president to push a foreign law-enforcement agency to investigate a U.S. citizen for conduct no U.S. law-enforcement agency has found to warrant an investigation.
- Abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. The oath he swears to “faithfully execute” his duties and “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” notwithstanding, the president is generally free to use his powers under Article II of the Constitution to benefit himself and harm those he disfavors.
Would you have been OK with it had it been Obama?
Show us.
I could go on but I have no doubt that no matter what is said you would defend him no matter what.
/——/ Adam Shytface couldn’t make the case because he had no evidence of wrong doing.He did each and every one of them. He has in fact admitted to most of them, and most of the senate republicans have admitted he did them as well. They have just decided they are OK with it./—-/ Trump did none of those things you moron.Acquitting trump has set some dangerous precedents. And while the trumps ass kissers think this is a victoiry because their thug was allowed to keep his job, the losers in this scenario are all of us as Americans.
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
In voting to acquit President Trump, the Senate has legitimated legal and moral claims that will not serve America well.
February 5, 2020
The Senate today voted largely along party lines to acquit President Donald Trump on two articles of impeachment. The acquittal, in the simplest sense, is a declaration that the House of Representatives failed to prove its case. But it is also a statement of values by the Senate—an embrace of certain basic propositions about the president’s conduct, the House’s conduct in impeaching him, and its own responsibilities.
At least in those circumstances in which the president and the majority of the Senate are of the same political party, the Senate has adopted the following propositions:
23 Dangerous Propositions the Senate Just Ratified
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to condition aid to a foreign government on the delivery of personal favors to himself.
- It is not an impeachable offense for the president of the United States to demand that a foreign head of state dish dirt on the president’s political opponents—or demand that he make dirt up if none is available to dish.
- For that matter, it is not an impeachable offense for the president to push a foreign law-enforcement agency to investigate a U.S. citizen for conduct no U.S. law-enforcement agency has found to warrant an investigation.
- Abuse of power is not an impeachable offense. The oath he swears to “faithfully execute” his duties and “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” notwithstanding, the president is generally free to use his powers under Article II of the Constitution to benefit himself and harm those he disfavors.
Would you have been OK with it had it been Obama?
Oh.
Quick question. On a scale of 1-100; 1 being no attention and 100 being full attention...what amount of consideration do you believe the average Senator (on both sides of the aisle) gave to the evidence?
I say “1”
Clean up your "office"
No they were his administration going beyond presidential powers. Him obstructing congress when he shielded Holder.You know that's not what those were.I guess you missed Fast and Furious? Perhaps the IRS debacle? You can't have missed the bombing of Doctors Without Borders.Yeah?He did that and more.He did each and every one of them. He has in fact admitted to most of them, and most of the senate republicans have admitted he did them as well. They have just decided they are OK with it./—-/ Trump did none of those things you moron.
Would you have been OK with it had it been Obama?
Show us.
I could go on but I have no doubt that no matter what is said you would defend him no matter what.
