Yeah, but almost no one just picked up his annus mirabilis papers and believed them right then and there. In fact it took decades before there was any proof of many of the claims Einstein made. That's the key: people kept investigating and reproducing the effects.
Relativity may have sprung from Einstein and his gifted mathematician wife, but it wasn't just accepted because everyone loved Einstein.
How is that obvious? Given that I actually DID open the file so I could see that it was by the single individual.
I have as much knowledge of the report as you do.
Just wait until you read it!
It took just 3 years after the seminal 1916 was published to give it support by Eddington and others, actually it was already recognized as being on track in the same year but full confirmation came 3 years later.
I have known this for about 40 years you didn't know at all.
===
This is what you saw on my first post that started the thread,
"In his annual State of the Climate report,
Ole Humlum, emeritus professor at the University of Oslo, examined detailed patterns in temperature changes in the atmosphere and oceans together with trends in climate impacts. Many of these show no significant trends and suggest that poorly understood natural cycles are involved."
That was in the open on my first post so you knew who it without opening the PDF as made clrear in your earlier replies from
POST 32:
"Watts up with That? Wow! A DENIALIST blog posting something from a well known denialist (Ole Humlum) that indicates that denialism is the way to go. Hmmmm....that's VERY INTERESTING and a COMPLETE SURPRISE!"
===
Then you run off at the mouth with your now proven LIES at
POST 33:
"The real key here is that this is the work of ONE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (Ole Humlum) and his
"spin" on others research.
It might be very interesting to discuss individual aspects of this, but it is HIGHLY unlikely that
Sunsettommy himself has read it.
It's just a nice headline from a denialist blog that he can hang his hat on.
I'd suggest that maybe Sunsettommy pick
ONE FACTOID from this article, discuss why he is impressed by it and we can actually start a dialogue about that particular thing."
black and red boldings mine
No mention of the PDF report at all (he says ARTICLE) and that all of it is his OWN work part of it from his own website and referring to many with a LONG list of references.
Still no evidence that you opened the PDF or read any of it is clear you are full of crap. You are a LYING sack of shit!
===
Here is the end part of post one which you never addressed at all:
Just like there is
NO Climate Emergency
Just like there is NO Tropospheric "hot" spot
Just like there is NO dangerous trends
Just like there is NO massive refugee exodus
=====
You are pathetic as I knew the main contents of the PDF which is why I brought these up since it has connections to the report you ignorant warmist/alarmist!
Post one article remains unchallenged
