2020 Ties for Hottest Year on Record, NASA Says (Nullfying 10,000 "it's cold this morning" posts here)

Rising temperatures last year capped the world’s warmest decade in modern times, federal climate scientists said Thursday.

In a new climate study, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration ranked 2020 in a dead heat with 2016 as the warmest year since official record-keeping began in 1880. The record-tying warmth came despite a cooling La Niña Pacific Ocean current, which tamped down global temperatures slightly in December.

In a separate assessment released at the same time, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which relies on slightly different temperature records and methods, calculated that the globally averaged temperature last year was the second highest to date—just 0.04 degrees Fahrenheit shy of tying the record set in 2016. -
“These long-term trends are very, very clear,” said Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York. “This is another piece of evidence that tells us the planet is warming decade by decade by decade.”

NASA and NOAA scientists labeled 2020 a year of extremes, driven by rising levels of Greenhouse Gases such as carbon dioxide and methane that trap heat in the atmosphere. - At times last year, the Arctic averaged 12 degrees Fahrenheit above normal, with some spots hitting temperatures of up to 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Record wildfires in the U.S. and Australia burned millions of acres and spewed smoke plumes high into the stratosphere. There were more named Atlantic storms than ever before. Heat building up...

It's fricking cold in florida-----------the coldest year that I can recall since I have been here. Another 40 degree night....





Snowing in Australia. In SUMMER. But abu is a religious fanatic. He will follow the scripture like his high priests demand.

If they told him to sacrifice a goat he'd kill his own daughter to appease the volcano gods...
 
Google link above

2020 Tied for Warmest Year on Record, NASA Analysis Shows
www.nasa.gov › press-release › 2020-tied-for-warmest-...

6 days ago — Globally, 2020 was the hottest year on record, effectively tying 2016, the previous record. Overall, Earth's average temperature has risen more ...

NASA Says 2020 Tied for Hottest Year on Record - Scientific ...
www.scientificamerican.com › article › 2020-will-rival-...

6 days ago — The results are finally in: 2020 was one of the hottest years in recorded history, according to data released today by NASA and the National ...

Has 2020 Ended as the Warmest Year on Record? | Discover ...
www.discovermagazine.com › environment › will-202...

Dec 31, 2020 — "With 99% of this epic rollercoaster of a year completed, time to reveal an estimate of 2020's global temperature: As far as GISTEMP is concerned, ...

2020 was Earth's 2nd-hottest year, just behind 2016 | National ...
www.noaa.gov › news › 2020-was-earth-s-2nd-hottest-...

6 days ago — It's official: 2020 ranks as the second-hottest year on record for the planet, knocking 2019 down to third hottest, according to an analysis by NOAA scientists.


ReinyDaze (and Westsmall) will now be RESIGNING for JUVENILE and STUPID POSTING.
100% HUMILIATED.
TRULY OBNOXIOUS AND DUMB little 14 year olds.


`
 
Last edited:
Noob?
I'm here 15 YEARS YOU MORON.
Easy to see.

BTW you **** IDIOT
DO YOU KNOW HOW TO G O O G L E?
How many sources you want you 12 IQ Moron?


`

Yeah ... noob ... why are you screaming? ... haw haw haw haw haw haw ... just nuts ...

Now little boy ... can you pick the one google hit from NASA and post a link here? ...
 
You post like a fucking asshole. And a dumb one at that. I've never seen you one time win any argument here with actual evidence that proved your position so you always fall back on just putting down the intelligence or integrity of the other person.

Abu does seem to love to shred people from an ad hominem angle, but he also puts more effort into his posts than most. Of course you don't think he wins the argument. It's political for you so you're incapable of thinking clearly.
 
Conspiracy? Nah.

Who gets more money for research?
The scientists who support the, "We're melting the planet, the scientists (and the politicians) need more money and power" viewpoint or the opposing viewpoint?

If it was evident that AGW isn't real then scientists would naturally be exploring that. You people post a few graphs and viewpoints from a blog website and feel like you've unraveled some conspiracy. Do you really think something that simple would have scientists all over the world either fooled or implicated in a conspiracy?
 
Conspiracy? Nah.

Who gets more money for research?
The scientists who support the, "We're melting the planet, the scientists (and the politicians) need more money and power" viewpoint or the opposing viewpoint?

If it was evident that AGW isn't real then scientists would naturally be exploring that. You people post a few graphs and viewpoints from a blog website and feel like you've unraveled some conspiracy. Do you really think something that simple would have scientists all over the world either fooled or implicated in a conspiracy?

If it was evident that AGW isn't real then scientists would naturally be exploring that.

That is awesome! Any negative consequences when a scientist publishes a paper
saying it isn't real? Are skeptics still allowed to publish?

You people post a few graphs and viewpoints from a blog website and feel like you've unraveled some conspiracy.

That's crazy! Everyone knows that any warming, hell, any change at all in the climate has to be because of the CO2 we've released over the last few hundred years.

Everyone knows that when it gets hotter, manmade global warming.
Everyone knows that when it gets colder, manmade climate change.
Everyone knows that when it gets drier, manmade climate change.
Everyone knows that when it gets wetter, manmade climate change.
Is there anything AGW can't do?

Do you really think something that simple would have scientists all over the world either fooled or implicated in a conspiracy?

I think that when you dangle hundreds of billions of dollars in front of scientists
and say, "Go find proof of AGW", they'll find the proof. No conspiracy need.
Just cash and the hope for more cash and more government control.

How much are they offering to disprove it? Hmmmmmmmmm.......
 
scientific illiterates

Are you one of the ones that think AGW is a giant conspiracy?








Conspiracy? No. They are making millions trying to turn you back into a serf. If I were a thinking person, which apparently you are not, I would wonder why climatologists fail to follow the scientific method.

Do you even know what the scientific method is?
 
Conspiracy? Nah.

Who gets more money for research?
The scientists who support the, "We're melting the planet, the scientists (and the politicians) need more money and power" viewpoint or the opposing viewpoint?

If it was evident that AGW isn't real then scientists would naturally be exploring that. You people post a few graphs and viewpoints from a blog website and feel like you've unraveled some conspiracy. Do you really think something that simple would have scientists all over the world either fooled or implicated in a conspiracy?






If they were competent and ethical, yeah. It is obvious that they are neither.

How many failed predictions do you need before you figure out they are lying to you?
 
scientific illiterates

Are you one of the ones that think AGW is a giant conspiracy?








Conspiracy? No. They are making millions trying to turn you back into a serf. If I were a thinking person, which apparently you are not, I would wonder why climatologists fail to follow the scientific method.

Do you even know what the scientific method is?

He will never get it since he is a determined science illiterate, he is a worshipper of a climate cult, where modeling scenarios is their bible.
 
Conspiracy? Nah.

Who gets more money for research?
The scientists who support the, "We're melting the planet, the scientists (and the politicians) need more money and power" viewpoint or the opposing viewpoint?

If it was evident that AGW isn't real then scientists would naturally be exploring that. You people post a few graphs and viewpoints from a blog website and feel like you've unraveled some conspiracy. Do you really think something that simple would have scientists all over the world either fooled or implicated in a conspiracy?






If they were competent and ethical, yeah. It is obvious that they are neither.

How many failed predictions do you need before you figure out they are lying to you?

He has COMPLETELY avoided this thread, where his science illiterate buddy made a fool of himself there.

Wrong Again: 2020’s Failed Climate Doomsaying

LINK
 
If they were competent and ethical, yeah. It is obvious that they are neither.

How many failed predictions do you need before you figure out they are lying to you?

Maybe compared to a climate scientist you don't actually know much about this topic.
 
He will never get it since he is a determined science illiterate, he is a worshipper of a climate cult, where modeling scenarios is their bible.

Apparently you think the climate scientists are determined science illiterates.
 
Westwall IS a Scientist, you moron!

Science is a pretty broad field in case you didn't know. Him being a "scientist" doesn't make him equal to active climate scientists in matters concerning the climate.

His qualifications would pale in comparison to the qualifications of all of the current scientists that disagree with him.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top