2008 Democratic Convention Agenda

manu1959

Left Coast Isolationist
Oct 28, 2004
13,761
1,652
48
california
Mainmain has a burr in his panties and wanted to make sure everyone knew i did not write this.....which if you read the thread you would be able to figure out....it seems he knows the source, yet being the little prick he is, he didn't post it....and instead goes on his little rant .... anyway, this was sent to me via e-mail from my friend mike and he did not note the source either.....happy now you micro managing little twat?

7:00 pm Opening flag burning

7:15 pm Pledge of Allegiance to the U.N.

7:20 pm Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

7:25 pm Nonreligious prayer and worship with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton

7:45 pm Ceremonial tree hugging

7:55 pm Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

8:00 pm How I Invented the Internet - Al Gore

8:15 pm Gay Wedding Planning - Barney Frank presiding

8:35 pm Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

8:40 pm Our Troops are War Criminals - John Kerry

9.00 pm Memorial service for Saddam and his sons - Cindy Sheehan and Susan Sarandon

10:00 pm "Answering Machine Etiquette" - Alec Baldwin

11:00 pm Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

11:05 pm Collection for the Osama Bin Laden kidney transplant fund - Barbra Streisand

11:15 pm Free the Freedom Fighters from Guantanamo Bay -- Sean Penn

11:30 pm Oval Office Affairs - William Jefferson Clinton

11:45 pm Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

11:50 pm How George Bush Brought Down the World Trade Towers - Howard Dean

12:15 am "Truth in Broadcasting Award" - Presented to Dan Rather by Michael Moore

12:25 am Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

12:30 am Satellite address by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

12:45 am Nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Nancy Pelosi

1:00 am Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

1:05 am Coronation of Hillary Rodham Clinton

1:30 am Ted Kennedy proposes a toast

1:35 am Bill Clinton asks Ted Kennedy to drive Hillary home
 
Ah...now if it was somethng denigrating the President it would no doubt be humorous as hell, eh?

if you can find one instance of me posting humorous denigration of the president - written by someone else - without attribution, please do so.
 
still funny.....how do you plagiarize spam?

simple. post it without noting its source.

you may indeed find it funny. but you did not write it, and without a link to your source, you de facto claim that you did.
 
That is just DIFFERENT of course.... now where did I leave my lapel pin that says " I did not vote for Clinton"?

I hope you find it and wear it out when you travel in Europe. I can just imagine what extra stuff the restaurant cooks will "give" you with your meals!
 
if you can find one instance of me posting humorous denigration of the president - written by someone else - without attribution, please do so.

Lighten up, dude! It's obvious to those that follow your posts why you didn't find it funny!
 
Lighten up, dude! It's obvious to those that follow your posts why you didn't find it funny!

why I didn't find it funny and why I DID find it to be plagiarized spam are two different things altogether.
 
No kidding???

Admit it. You didn't find it funny; it irritated you so you slammed the poster.


no...actually, what irritated me was reading it - or a variation of it - for the umpteenth time. It is shopworn and sophomoric. I didn't find it funny the FIRST time I read it, but I really didn't find it funny this time...and when the poster posts this stuff and doesn't show the common decency to admit that he, himself, does not have the intellect or the "humor" to create such a document on his own, but tries to pass it off as "original"....THAT is what irritates me.
 
no...actually, what irritated me was reading it - or a variation of it - for the umpteenth time. It is shopworn and sophomoric. I didn't find it funny the FIRST time I read it, but I really didn't find it funny this time...and when the poster posts this stuff and doesn't show the common decency to admit that he, himself, does not have the intellect or the "humor" to create such a document on his own, but tries to pass it off as "original"....THAT is what irritates me.

Well alrighty then. I guess you told me!
 
no...actually, what irritated me was reading it - or a variation of it - for the umpteenth time. It is shopworn and sophomoric. I didn't find it funny the FIRST time I read it, but I really didn't find it funny this time...and when the poster posts this stuff and doesn't show the common decency to admit that he, himself, does not have the intellect or the "humor" to create such a document on his own, but tries to pass it off as "original"....THAT is what irritates me.

Man, yer a grouchy fuck lately..

Lighten up, eh?
 
Manu Wrote:
Mainmain has a burr in his panties and wanted to make sure everyone knew i did not write this.....which if you read the thread you would be able to figure out....it seems he knows the source, yet being the little prick he is, he didn't post it....and instead goes on his little rant .... anyway, this was sent to me via e-mail from my friend mike and he did not note the source either.....happy now you micro managing little twat?

Come on, now. I, for one, have seen NUMEROUS "righties" on this board rip "lefties" up one side and down the other for not posting sources for all manner of posts, funny or not....all you would have needed to do is respond to Maineman that he needed to lighten up about finding things funny and that it was sent to you via-email from a friend with no source.

I found it amusing...I chuckled...and at the end I thought, "oops...he didn't give a source, I bet someone's gonna mention that." But you know what...it wouldn't have surprised me if it had been a moderator rather than another poster...we all know the rules...you should always try to give a source. While I'm totally willing to state that Maineman was unreasonably grouchy about a little "right-wing" humor...I'm not quite sure why the trashing of him had to be quite so ferocious.

Just my two cents...
 
Manu Wrote:


Come on, now. I, for one, have seen NUMEROUS "righties" on this board rip "lefties" up one side and down the other for not posting sources for all manner of posts, funny or not....all you would have needed to do is respond to Maineman that he needed to lighten up about finding things funny and that it was sent to you via-email from a friend with no source.

I found it amusing...I chuckled...and at the end I thought, "oops...he didn't give a source, I bet someone's gonna mention that." But you know what...it wouldn't have surprised me if it had been a moderator rather than another poster...we all know the rules...you should always try to give a source. While I'm totally willing to state that Maineman was unreasonably grouchy about a little "right-wing" humor...I'm not quite sure why the trashing of him had to be quite so ferocious.

Just my two cents...

so let me see if i got this...he can trash me but i can't respond....this is in the humor section for christ sake....get a grip....
 
so let me see if i got this...he can trash me but i can't respond....this is in the humor section for christ sake....get a grip....

I can take criticism as well as the next man.... by all means, don't hold back.

my point stands: this is sophomoric. It doesn't have any tread left on its tires it has driven around the internet so long... and you posted it yet again...and didn't list your source.

Is any of THAT untrue?
 

Forum List

Back
Top