Only 200? What kind of a degree do you need to become a "political scientist"? Maybe a GED?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should anyone believe they are smart?Love the way Republicans on the USMB attack "smart".
Somehow, they have taken up the narrative that smart people are bad.
Smart people are stupid.
But not them, noooo, not them.
So tell us again, what's the opposite of smart?
200 German political scientist said hitler was a great leader
He doesn't seem to realize that he's debunking his own argument.I didn’t call them facts. You called them worthless. This is on you dude lol.Opinions aren't facts, moron. That's why they are called "opinions."So all of your opinions are worthless? Got it. Thanks for clarifying.When you say it's "subjective," you mean it's worthless.
Observe dumbshit Billy000, quadrupling down on derp.
My post is based on the opinion of experts who have studied history and understand politics of today. My opinion - and especially yours - are insignificant to theirs.If they aren't facts, then why did you bother to post them? You're admitting they prove nothing. Yet, you imply we should draw some kind of conclusion from them.I didn’t call them facts. You called them worthless. This is on you dude lol.Opinions aren't facts, moron. That's why they are called "opinions."So all of your opinions are worthless? Got it. Thanks for clarifying.When you say it's "subjective," you mean it's worthless.Ahh the irony. You accuse me of a fallacy about hundreds of experts while also believing anything Trump says.
Again my thread isn’t an appeal to authority because it’s subjective. Of course, given your own definition of the fallacy, you should believe man made climate change is real because a consensus of scientists said so based on actual scientific evidence.
My post is based on the opinion of experts who have studied history and understand politics of today. My opinion - and especially yours - are insignificant to theirs.If they aren't facts, then why did you bother to post them? You're admitting they prove nothing. Yet, you imply we should draw some kind of conclusion from them.I didn’t call them facts. You called them worthless. This is on you dude lol.Opinions aren't facts, moron. That's why they are called "opinions."So all of your opinions are worthless? Got it. Thanks for clarifying.When you say it's "subjective," you mean it's worthless.
Lol let me get this straight. You think Trump understands military strategy more than Obama did? That’s so dumb. You’re basing that on nothing. And yeah, they definitely understand economics and government more than your dumbass.My post is based on the opinion of experts who have studied history and understand politics of today. My opinion - and especially yours - are insignificant to theirs.If they aren't facts, then why did you bother to post them? You're admitting they prove nothing. Yet, you imply we should draw some kind of conclusion from them.I didn’t call them facts. You called them worthless. This is on you dude lol.Opinions aren't facts, moron. That's why they are called "opinions."So all of your opinions are worthless? Got it. Thanks for clarifying.
What are they expert at, economics? No. Government? No. Military strategy? No.
So how is their opinion any more valid than mine? You keep saying the poll is just their opinion. That's another way of saying we have no reason to consider it. Then you try to claim exactly the opposite.
The fact is that most historians are humbugs.
Donald Trump ranked worst president in US history by nearly 200 political scientists
Surprised? You shouldn’t be.
Donald Trump ranked worst president in US history by nearly 200 political scientists
Surprised? You shouldn’t be.
I'm not surprised. TDS is at epidemic levels.Donald Trump ranked worst president in US history by nearly 200 political scientists
Surprised? You shouldn’t be.
I realize this is just another partisan attack thread, but I wonder how such an opinion can be formed by a rational, honest, serious person, just 18 months into a Presidency.
It's a terribly complicated world, and the effects of many (if not most) major things any given President does neither manifest immediately nor fully play out for at least a couple of years, if not longer.
Just another example of why I don't understand partisan politics, I reckon.
.
Sure, we'll find out in time, you bet. But this stuff is just silly.It is true about policy, however he has been a very decisive force while in office. Now is that good or bad we will find out in time I believe.I realize this is just another partisan attack thread, but I wonder how such an opinion can be formed by a rational, honest, serious person, just 18 months into a Presidency.
It's a terribly complicated world, and the effects of many (if not most) major things any given President does neither manifest immediately nor fully play out for at least a couple of years, if not longer. Just another example of why I don't understand partisan politics, I reckon.
Trump has zero experience in government. This should not be surprising.
The tax cuts are a short term shot to the economy while adding to the debt. The opposite of being fiscally responsible.Trump has zero experience in government. This should not be surprising.
But Trump has plenty of experience as an executive, something that Obama did not, and the difference is already obvious: a stronger economy, more take-home pay, a much more energetic and effective strategy against ISIS (to the point that ISIS has virtually been destroyed), a better regulatory climate, higher consumer and business confidence, etc., etc.