2% of the population is gay

What percent of the population is handicapped (aka, physically challenged)?

Are the haters here all pissed off about that group getting all the good parking spaces?
 
You have the OP whining about gays and yet it's the librul LIE of homosexuality being an inherited gene- it's the DEMANDS of an absolute TINY minority who when any other group such as Christians or Jews, were they to DEMAND their religious dogma be taught in elementary schools would scream the loudest.

LMAO It's a joke.. the entire argument and emotional blackmail of the lie.. Militant homosexual cultists demand their way or none.

What? Stop deflecting and answer the simple question..jesus why is everything such a chore with you.
 
I'm still waiting.. WHICH IS THE LIE?? Homosexuals born that way through biological science- SHOW US... or Evolution- Darwinism.. No LIBRUL propagandist will touch it.. they can't.. it's game, set match.
 
And yet the Anti-God leftist who touts Evolution mocks and perverts the very science he claims to embrace. LMAO ILLOGICAL INSANITY = LEFTISM
 
Great you are spamming now...look go start a thread about your inane question.
Till then you still havent answered the question.
 
If this is true based on someone here stating it. Why all the worry about being forced to accept it? Are you that worried about 2%? Regardless if you feel its abnormal, a choice or whatever. How can 2% Really be that mich of a threat to your way of life. At 2% the odds of you running into a gay person are rather slim.

Well slim if you dont actively go seeking it.

In England they are already suing the churches for not letting them get married in the church.

We understand this has nothing to do with equality. Why don't you?
 
If this is true based on someone here stating it. Why all the worry about being forced to accept it? Are you that worried about 2%? Regardless if you feel its abnormal, a choice or whatever. How can 2% Really be that mich of a threat to your way of life. At 2% the odds of you running into a gay person are rather slim.

Well slim if you dont actively go seeking it.

In England they are already suing the churches for not letting them get married in the church.

We understand this has nothing to do with equality. Why don't you?

We are not England. Moving on.
 
And yet the Anti-God leftist who touts Evolution mocks and perverts the very science he claims to embrace. LMAO ILLOGICAL INSANITY = LEFTISM

Maybe they came about via creationism then.

Which makes your god one conflicted character.
 
And yet the Anti-God leftist who touts Evolution mocks and perverts the very science he claims to embrace. LMAO ILLOGICAL INSANITY = LEFTISM

Maybe they came about via creationism then.

Which makes your god one conflicted character.

You tell me.. Which do you believe? If you say evolution then you have no scientific support for homosexuality.
 
Well, 2% of the population just forced the most populous state in the nation to abrogate its own referendum. So yes I'd say they're a threat.
 
Well, 2% of the population just forced the most populous state in the nation to abrogate its own referendum. So yes I'd say they're a threat.

Exactly.. and it's all based upon lies the left spews thru Academia, the media, Hollywood.. Once more, is it ok for Jews to demand Judaism be taught in schools, be shown in films, television shows.?? IS IT??
 
Ok so no real serious answer yet..

How are 2% a threat to society...feel free to leave out silly hyperbole

they are asking that their DEMANDS be bowed down to or they will SUE YOU..

That's a threat to peoples livelihoods in society

People have a right to challenge a law that they think is unconstitutional; see Loving vs. Virginia.
 
Ok so no real serious answer yet..

How are 2% a threat to society...feel free to leave out silly hyperbole

they are asking that their DEMANDS be bowed down to or they will SUE YOU..

That's a threat to peoples livelihoods in society

People have a right to challenge a law that they think is unconstitutional; see Loving vs. Virginia.

Loving was based upon bigotry- race based. If people can start suing over a sexual act, can Zoophiliacs sue over not being able to **** animals and marry them also?
 
2% of the population is forcing 98% of the population to make changes to their own lives to suit that 2%.
 
You have the OP whining about gays and yet it's the librul LIE of homosexuality being an inherited gene- it's the DEMANDS of an absolute TINY minority who when any other group such as Christians or Jews, were they to DEMAND their religious dogma be taught in elementary schools would scream the loudest.

LMAO It's a joke.. the entire argument and emotional blackmail of the lie.. Militant homosexual cultists demand their way or none.

What's the big deal if it's not an inherited gene and just a a person's choice?
 
15th post
You have the OP whining about gays and yet it's the librul LIE of homosexuality being an inherited gene- it's the DEMANDS of an absolute TINY minority who when any other group such as Christians or Jews, were they to DEMAND their religious dogma be taught in elementary schools would scream the loudest.

LMAO It's a joke.. the entire argument and emotional blackmail of the lie.. Militant homosexual cultists demand their way or none.

What's the big deal if it's not an inherited gene and just a a person's choice?
Then tell the ******* truth.. Stop saying Homosexuals cannot help the way they were born.. and being it's a lifestyle choice, DO NOT demand that your ******* choice must be forced upon the rest of society.. any more than Christianity or Judaism should be..
 
they are asking that their DEMANDS be bowed down to or they will SUE YOU..

That's a threat to peoples livelihoods in society

People have a right to challenge a law that they think is unconstitutional; see Loving vs. Virginia.

Loving was based upon bigotry- race based. If people can start suing over a sexual act, can Zoophiliacs sue over not being able to **** animals and marry them also?

Sure they can sue, but will they win? If they win, how would it effect you?
 
That explains 2% of the 51% dummies that voted for tyranny in Obama.

So by default it was a 49%/49% tie

I want a recount!

-Geaux
 
People have a right to challenge a law that they think is unconstitutional; see Loving vs. Virginia.

Loving was based upon bigotry- race based. If people can start suing over a sexual act, can Zoophiliacs sue over not being able to **** animals and marry them also?

Sure they can sue, but will they win? If they win, how would it effect you?

Finally a liberal who admits the SCIENTIFIC truth.. there is no gay gene.. NOT TRUE, a fabricated lie and propaganda campaign to FORCE Americans in to emotional blackmail and guilt.. and yet you hear this LIE constantly.. Even Bodey and Wtchey compare themselves to Jews.. IT'S A LIE.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom