Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People can have all the children they can feed without welfare.With the NRaas Story Progression Mod you can change the Sims 3 default settings and make it happen in an imaginary world.
The Libertarian in me says people need to mind their own business and take care of their own shit ... Before worrying about what other people do or how many children they have.
.
People can have all the children they can feed without welfare.
If they turn to the government, I am all for mandatory tubal ligation and vasectomy.
Because any measure limiting families to two children would be struck down as un-Constitutional:China did it. Why shouldn't we?
Pros? Cons?
Discuss
China did it. Why shouldn't we?
Pros? Cons?
Discuss
I don't think it should be enforced but encouraged. China enforces this idea. When I lived in Austria, pretty much everyone did have only 2 kids but by choice because they have a well educated populace. The better the education, the more likely people will not have large families.China did it. Why shouldn't we?
Pros? Cons?
Discuss
You said it better than I did or could.I don't think it should be enforced but encouraged. China enforces this idea. When I lived in Austria, pretty much everyone did have only 2 kids but by choice because they have a well educated populace. The better the education, the more likely people will not have large families.China did it. Why shouldn't we?
Pros? Cons?
Discuss
Educated people realize that if they have two kids, instead of 3 or 4 or more, they can provide their kids a better life--better economically and more attention for each kid.
Austria has near zero population growth. It makes for a healthier economy, less social problems, and a saner society all around.
I think it's a great idea but should not be enforced.
One thing is taxes. The more children you have, the more tax breaks you get. That may have made sense back in the old times, but with an over populated world today, it does not make sense. There is an attitude in our culture that people who have children are better people, that they are contributing more to our society than people who don't have children. This is a biased and unreasonable idea, especially based on the fact of over population.You said it better than I did or could.I don't think it should be enforced but encouraged. China enforces this idea. When I lived in Austria, pretty much everyone did have only 2 kids but by choice because they have a well educated populace. The better the education, the more likely people will not have large families.China did it. Why shouldn't we?
Pros? Cons?
Discuss
Educated people realize that if they have two kids, instead of 3 or 4 or more, they can provide their kids a better life--better economically and more attention for each kid.
Austria has near zero population growth. It makes for a healthier economy, less social problems, and a saner society all around.
I think it's a great idea but should not be enforced.
I don't think it should be enforced either. But maybe some other solution? Like, not really penalties for larger family but more like rewards for smaller families? Hell I dunno. Just more ideas being tossed.
But the main concern I have is the sea. There it is. Huge. Vast. A lot of it unexplored. WET. There should be plants along every shore if the USA where drought is hitting crops. Those crops feed the USA. No crops, no food. No water, no crops. And more new mouths to feed because people don't THINK.
I want another dog. Or a cat.I do.But I have not gotten one. I want one soooooo bad. The pound is full of animals that want a forever home. As much as I wish I could go get one..I can't and I won't. Why? Because what little Mr Gracie and I have, what little extra "emergency money" we have saved up, is for the two we have now. If they get sick, we can get medical help for them. If one of us need to see a dentist, we can see a dentist (we do not have dental insurance). If we get another dog...and an emergency comes up like Moki getting another lump that needs to be surgically removed...then what? Let him die? No extra money, cuz the new dog got a broken leg or has a bad tooth or has some internal problem. Hundred of money goes to the vet. Emergency funds drop down. But with no extra dog...the ones we have are taken care of better. No worries if a problem comes up. Or any of us have a cavity or need a tooth pulled. So..I do without. No dog. No cat.
If people would consider that, as Esmeralda explained, then smaller families make more sense.
Just thinking out loud. No need for anyone to get peeved for these thoughts. Just..musing.
Nor is it mine. Until they ask me to pay for them.none of my business how many kids a person , woman , family has .
As a taxpayer, it is.none of my business how many kids a person , woman , family has .
That attitude has us up to our asses in feral children.Legally it will not happen, Morally it should not happen. It is none of the Governments business how many kids a family wants. It is none of YOUR business either.