some of you DO insist it's a myth.
Some is NOT me. You are talking to me. Therefore you can STFU yourself, bitch.
Self-absorbed and sanctimonious much? I believe I'm taking on you and all your pals throughout this thread, ... and doing a bang-up job, to boot.
I know this exchange is making you madder and madder, but do try and get over yourself.
In fact, you're far less knowledgeable at this subject matter than I'm used to dealing with.
But you've been debunked by elementary logic. Oh look at the graph! All the declines and leveling off correspond EXACTLY with political upheaval, legislation and war! Huh... I wonder why that is? Then after you have hard data, all your predictions smoothly decline like someone flipped a switch? Anomaly perhaps? That may fly with the slow group of third graders, but not anyone else.
LOL!!!!!!!! You've debunked precisely nothing throughout the ENTIRETY of this exchange. You declaring victory reminds me of when Plaxico Burress spiked the ball at the 5 yardline when he arrogantly thought he was in the end zone.
It's so bad for you now, that you can't even bring yourself to acknowledge any of my main overall points when challenged to do so... That's because you can't.
1. where is the oil?
2. what happens to the small businessman when oil gets above $100-150/bl and higher?
3. how/why are all those entities "lying," yet still keeping it secret?
And yet... you're playing special Olympics badminton?
That's a question? No, I'm playing All-Star clean-up hitter, launching your tired, hope-based narrative softballs deep into the night and touching all bases each time. Do better.
LOL. You can worship God however you like... Doesn't make for much of an energy policy though, sorry.
Trillions may have been an exaggeration.
At least you finally admit it, oh great drama queen...
But, billions is not. Of course... that's not "oil" by the King Chicken Little the Last standard. That's... oil...ish?
The world consumes a billion barrels every 12 days, loser. When you can point to a new find in excess of 50 billion barrels (the kind we used to find constantly), you may have something. Otherwise, you're getting all mastubatory over kiddie pools and pretending you've debunked peak oil reality. You haven't even come close.
Ding! For money and power. First correct thing you've said all thread. I bet there are people with enough hobby time out there that can find three times the hacks you have who think Imminent Peak Oil is full of shit.
There's nothing I've said in this thread that was wrong. If I had, you'd have been man enough to acknowledge the multiple challenges put to you. Instead, you weaseled out, and punted to ineffectual personal ridicule. Yawn.
Your complete inability to counter the specific themes presented to you in this exchange prove, beyond any doubt, that you're getting your ass kicked on this topic. I'm sorry.
I am not a conspiracy theorist. I do not believe in grand conspiracies. Too many people who can't keep their mouths shut. BUT I do believe in conspiracies of a small scale (say under 10 people or so) because they do happen.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And yet, here you are claiming that retired petrol geologists for Big Oil, independent energy analysts, the IEA, the U.S. Dept. of Energy, the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs, the EIA, ASPO, Oxford, the German government and countless other entities are all lying for some unmentioned purpose you can't put your finger on. No, you don't believe in "grand conspiracies," or anything...
BTW, how's that IPCC panel working out for you? Conspiracy of 3 people created climategate. A conspiracy of two individuals destroyed the glacier melt theory and all it took was one man, the head of the IPCC to keep his mouth shut for it to continue. But he couldn't. And it all fell apart. But they all profiteered off of this by committing fraud. Now you Peakers wants theirs, but yet, I can smash the theory in a few logical steps.
Man-made climate change is very real, regardless of how desperate you tool boxes play "gotcha" regarding IPCC. It's what you guys do. Find one anomoly, and cling to it out of sheer desperation in the hopes of creating doubt. It's the same game as when you try and claim the Dem party is "more racist than pubs are" because of goofy Robert Byrd. Yeah, makes sense.

Nevermind the mountain of evidence to the contrary. You have your one talking point, and you're sticking to it. LOL.
Your situational ethics is showing again, chump-and-a-half.
Prove it, bitch. Where am I making it up as I go. I've been consistent this entire time.
I don't need to. Anyone reading this exchange can see you treading water badly, and contradicting yourself left and right.
When stuck in a hole, the first thing you should do is stop digging. But you're just too arrogant and dumb to grasp that basic premise. Again, you SUCK at this.
Once more:
- Where is the oil?
- What will "market corrections" mean for the blue-collar consumer when energy is $150-bl? I mean, besides foreclosure?
- For what purpose are all those international entities lying, and how have they "kept the myth a secret" all this time?
Until you can offer plausible answers for those questions, your hysterical hand waving isn't convincing anyone of anything. You can insult me on a personal level all you like. I'm right here waiting for you to do the work presented for you. But you won't. You'll punt to God and hope and free market solution. Zzzzzz.
Grow up, watch the videos, and then you may have a leg to stand on if you feel you can counter what they've said.