17 Intelligence Agencies Claim Russia Was Behind Hacking

[defcon4]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

Agencies change: new leadership, new hires, retirements and circumstances all differ; see the influence of the neo conservatives (read the records of the Project for a New American Century) and the names of those establishment members who signed the Statement of Principles in June 1997, and how they have little of no influence today.

Context of 'June 3, 1997: PNAC Think Tank Issues Statement of Principles'

Intelligence agencies gather information. What is your point?

 

[Iceweasel]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

Agencies change: new leadership, new hires, retirements and circumstances all differ; see the influence of the neo conservatives (read the records of the Project for a New American Century) and the names of those establishment members who signed the Statement of Principles in June 1997, and how they have little of no influence today.

Context of 'June 3, 1997: PNAC Think Tank Issues Statement of Principles'

Intelligence agencies gather information. What is your point?

....he has none. No point or intelligence.

 

[Wry Catcher]

To hurt Trump and to "warm up" the public for the idea of the war with Russia.

Yes, that is the essence of it.

. Makes the Demon-crats far more dangerous than Trump, but the crazy Americans don't see this ??? Amazing. What if Putin begins creating the body language of war with America again, and it being based on our accusations by the dam lying liberals/Demon-crats???? Another cold war with Russia Clinton wants eh ??

The Cold War began with Putin's ascendancy to power.

The agencies which are chartered to make us safe are not all under the auspices of the DOD/Military and it's industrial partners.

"Demon-crats"? Really - LOL

Q. why not put a sign around your neck advertising you are a partisan hack
A. No need, your post is proof positive that you are a partisan hack

There is zero evidence to prove the claim that the D. Party or HRC is, "far more dangerous than Trump". Apparently beagle9 and Stratford57 have not been listening to Trump's off the teleprompter comments, or Madam Secretary's clear and sage comments on our nation's problems, and the means she would employ as POTUS.

 

[Wry Catcher]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

Agencies change: new leadership, new hires, retirements and circumstances all differ; see the influence of the neo conservatives (read the records of the Project for a New American Century) and the names of those establishment members who signed the Statement of Principles in June 1997, and how they have little of no influence today.

Context of 'June 3, 1997: PNAC Think Tank Issues Statement of Principles'

Intelligence agencies gather information. What is your point?

Yes Virginia, there are dumb questions.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

Russia hackers hacked the email accounts, so let own that one but what those Hackers and Wikileaks did was open the eyes of the American Voter to the level of hate and corruption that the Democratic Party has for the Founding Fathers system of Government...

Too bad the typical partisan nutter will dismiss the emails while proclaiming Hillary is a saint... ( Even Lucifer would deny her three times and collect his thirty pieces of silver )

 

[Stratford57]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

My question is --- how come the culprits in the emails are not saying that the content was a lie??

Because there was no lie.

I wonder, what a liberal would do if he/she finds a piece of gold, which is dirty. Would he/she throw it away or wash off and use? Same thing with the truth, because gold remains gold and the truth remains the truth regardless if it is dirty or clean.

Liberals just hate the truth, they need to face it!

 

[tyroneweaver]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

Now Russia is now the biggest threat "1980s policy?" ..WTF?

This should be posted everyday
Trump shoulda used this in a campaign ad.
Hypocrisy of the dems knows no bounds.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There are either 17 agency representatives thst don't want to be fired or one agency representative getting lied about. Or, no agencies and it's all a lie.

 

[Pop23]

If Russia was doing this, they would do it in such a way that it could not be tracked back to them. What? You don't think they would be dumb enough to initiate it from within there borders do you?

That is, unless they wanted it tracked back to them, which is actually even scarier.

 

[Wry Catcher]

If Russia was doing this, they would do it in such a way that it could not be tracked back to them. What? You don't think they would be dumb enough to initiate it from within there borders do you?

That is, unless they wanted it tracked back to them, which is actually even scarier.

Plausible deniability: Hackers are private citizens, not working under the direction or permission of the Russian Government (wink - wink).

Maybe Putin's plan is to make a show trial, arresting his detractors, claiming they are the hackers, or using Snowden as his scapegoat. It's clear he blames Obama and Clinton for the economic sanctions which has added to his countries economic problems, and prefers Trump who will be easy to manipulate.

Why is the right wing is defending Russia? Has the RED SCARE been downgraded since Trump praised Putin?

 

[Iceweasel]

If Russia was doing this, they would do it in such a way that it could not be tracked back to them. What? You don't think they would be dumb enough to initiate it from within there borders do you?

That is, unless they wanted it tracked back to them, which is actually even scarier.

Plausible deniability: Hackers are private citizens, not working under the direction or permission of the Russian Government (wink - wink).

Maybe Putin's plan is to make a show trial, arresting his detractors, claiming they are the hackers, or using Snowden as his scapegoat. It's clear he blames Obama and Clinton for the economic sanctions which has added to his countries economic problems, and prefers Trump who will be easy to manipulate.

Why is the right wing is defending Russia? Has the RED SCARE been downgraded since Trump praised Putin?

The correct question is why is the left attacking Russia without evidence. How stupid is that? What haven't they fucked up? And this could be a big one.

 

[Tom Horn]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

The claim never passed the sniff-test in the first place....nobody should believe a word this government says....gypsies, tramps, and thieves.

 

[defcon4]

Plausible deniability: Hackers are private citizens, not working under the direction or permission of the Russian Government (wink - wink).

Maybe Putin's plan is to make a show trial, arresting his detractors, claiming they are the hackers, or using Snowden as his scapegoat. It's clear he blames Obama and Clinton for the economic sanctions which has added to his countries economic problems, and prefers Trump who will be easy to manipulate.

Why is the right wing is defending Russia? Has the RED SCARE been downgraded since Trump praised Putin?

^^^This question begs the question of why the left ignores what was revealed in those emails instead of focusing on who's done it?

 

[defcon4]

The other question is:
Were those intelligence agencies wrong in their assessments or lied for political reasons? Consequently, are they wrong again or are they lying again for political reasons?

 

[beagle9]

Plausible deniability: Hackers are private citizens, not working under the direction or permission of the Russian Government (wink - wink).

Maybe Putin's plan is to make a show trial, arresting his detractors, claiming they are the hackers, or using Snowden as his scapegoat. It's clear he blames Obama and Clinton for the economic sanctions which has added to his countries economic problems, and prefers Trump who will be easy to manipulate.

Why is the right wing is defending Russia? Has the RED SCARE been downgraded since Trump praised Putin?

^^^This question begs the question of why the left ignores what was revealed in those emails instead of focusing on who's done it?

. Because they know their caught red handed, so deflect, deflect, deflect.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Plausible deniability: Hackers are private citizens, not working under the direction or permission of the Russian Government (wink - wink).

Maybe Putin's plan is to make a show trial, arresting his detractors, claiming they are the hackers, or using Snowden as his scapegoat. It's clear he blames Obama and Clinton for the economic sanctions which has added to his countries economic problems, and prefers Trump who will be easy to manipulate.

Why is the right wing is defending Russia? Has the RED SCARE been downgraded since Trump praised Putin?

^^^This question begs the question of why the left ignores what was revealed in those emails instead of focusing on who's done it?

. Because they know their caught red handed, so deflect, deflect, deflect.

The e-mails are minor issues, and most of the things that make the right wing hysterical are dwarfed by the primary source, the fascist rhetoric coming from the mouth of Donald Trump. I guess what Trump spews is acceptable to his supporters, most seem to be neo fascists and some budding brown shirts.

 

[beagle9]

Plausible deniability: Hackers are private citizens, not working under the direction or permission of the Russian Government (wink - wink).

Maybe Putin's plan is to make a show trial, arresting his detractors, claiming they are the hackers, or using Snowden as his scapegoat. It's clear he blames Obama and Clinton for the economic sanctions which has added to his countries economic problems, and prefers Trump who will be easy to manipulate.

Why is the right wing is defending Russia? Has the RED SCARE been downgraded since Trump praised Putin?

^^^This question begs the question of why the left ignores what was revealed in those emails instead of focusing on who's done it?

. Because they know their caught red handed, so deflect, deflect, deflect.

The e-mails are minor issues, and most of the things that make the right wing hysterical are dwarfed by the primary source, the fascist rhetoric coming from the mouth of Donald Trump. I guess what Trump spews is acceptable to his supporters, most seem to be neo fascists and some budding brown shirts.

. Just because you claim there minor doesn't make it so, but that is a tactic by the left also.

 

[rdean]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

No. The Bush Administration carefully fed the American public information he knew was bad. It's all on film.

 

[rdean]

Bush lies were endless.

 

[defcon4]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

No. The Bush Administration carefully fed the American public information he knew was bad. It's all on film.

Based on intelligence reports they said. Congress (the appropriate committees) was briefed by intelligence. So your post makes no sense in trying to deny that they based their propaganda on intelligence. Also consider the post I made earlier. Here it is:

The other question is:
Were those intelligence agencies wrong in their assessments or lied for political reasons? Consequently, are they wrong again or are they lying again for political reasons?