17 Intelligence Agencies Claim Russia Was Behind Hacking

[defcon4]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Excellent question and valid point.. Everything is RIGGED and is a lie we're finding out from Google rigging polls - leaked via wIKI TO the FBI in collusion with Hellary... I don't believe a fucking word ANY Government dept under the Obama/Clinton Regime spew.. it's all PROPAGANDA

 

[Iceweasel]

A: What evidence did they produce, or was it just politics?
B: Why the fuck do we have 17 intelligence agencies?

 

[Defiant1]

I this hacking a crime in Russia?

 

[jon_berzerk]

when it is all boiled down it was

one person james clapper (the one who committed perjury) not 17 agencies

and it never was "confirmed"

 

[turzovka]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

There have been many incriminating wikileaks emails given to the public in the last month. Very incriminating, so much that none of the leftist news networks will report on them. Journalistic integrity at its finest. ("Hey, CNN --- the phone's ringing. I think it's a broad who once knew Donald.")

My question is --- how come the culprits in the emails are not saying that the content was a lie?? how come the culprits are not coming forth and saying what was doctored or added into those emails? If what we got was a lie, who would not seek to prove it if they are the person who made those statements?

Russia, my foot.

 

[Stratford57]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

17 intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

Putin: This is my response to the hacker attacks.
What are we witnessing? Some hackers published information about the unseemly conduct of Ms Clinton’s campaign headquarters – supporting one candidate for the party nomination at the expense of the other.

Hysterical accusations that this is in Russia’s interests were made. But there is nothing in Russia’s interests there. They freak out about it to distract the attention of the American people from the importance of what was published by the hackers. And the importance is that public opinion is being manipulated, but nobody talks about it. Everyone is talking about who did it, but is it so important who did it? What is important is the content of this.

Russia Calling! Investment Forum

 

[defcon4]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

 

[Stratford57]

Two flies with one swat.

To hurt Trump and to "warm up" the public opinion for a possible war with Russia.

And of course, to distract attentions from Mrs. Clinton's crimes.

 

[defcon4]

To hurt Trump and to "warm up" the public for the idea of the war with Russia.

Yes, that is the essence of it.

 

[Jroc]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

Now Russia is now the biggest threat "1980s policy?" ..WTF?

 

[beagle9]

It's just amazing how stupid we as Americans have become in all of this. Koolaid getting stronger & stronger it seems, because they say the evil one is leading in the polls, and the evil one is Hillary.

 

[beagle9]

To hurt Trump and to "warm up" the public for the idea of the war with Russia.

Yes, that is the essence of it.

. Makes the Demon-crats far more dangerous than Trump, but the crazy Americans don't see this ??? Amazing. What if Putin begins creating the body language of war with America again, and it being based on our accusations by the dam lying liberals/Demon-crats???? Another cold war with Russia Clinton wants eh ??

 

[Stratford57]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

Now Russia is now the biggest threat "1980s policy?" ..WTF?

Russia is a very comfortable "threat" for a lot of reasons.
This year Pentagon claimed 4 times more money than last year!

The Pentagon’s claims that Russia and China are among the top challenges for the US is a justification to continue the flow of taxpayer’s money into major weapon systems and their corporate sponsors, Karen Kwiatkowski, retired US Air Force Lieutenant Colonel told RT.

US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carterannounced Tuesday that the Pentagon will request a $582.7 billion defense budget in order to maintain security (several times more than last year). According to Carter, there are five main challenges for the US to focus on Russia, Iran, China, North Korea and ISIS.
‘Acts of aggression come from Pentagon, not Russia or China’
--

To counter the new Russian ‘threat’ not just to ‘democratic’ Ukraine, but to other countries in eastern Europe, we’re told we need a big increase in NATO ‘defense’ spending. And who does that benefit? Why, US defense contractors!

As Charlie Chaplin commented in his classic 1947 black comedy Monsieur Verdoux, "Wars, conflicts, it’s all business!"

But anyone who points this out, and mentions the military alliance’s relentless Drang nach Osten, threatens the profits of US defense companies and is attacked as an ‘appeaser' or ‘Kremlin stooge’ by those with a vested financial interest in keeping tensions high.

Follow the money trail for source of 'Russian threat' paranoia

 

[Jroc]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

Now Russia is now the biggest threat "1980s policy?" ..WTF?

Russia is a very comfortable "threat" for a lot of reasons.
This year Pentagon claimed 4 times more money than last year!

The Pentagon’s claims that Russia and China are among the top challenges for the US is a justification to continue the flow of taxpayer’s money into major weapon systems and their corporate sponsors, Karen Kwiatkowski, retired US Air Force Lieutenant Colonel told RT.

US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carterannounced Tuesday that the Pentagon will request a $582.7 billion defense budget in order to maintain security (several times more than last year). According to Carter, there are five main challenges for the US to focus on Russia, Iran, China, North Korea and ISIS.

‘Acts of aggression come from Pentagon, not Russia or China’

So Obama is a dumbass and didn't know what he was talking about right?

 

[beagle9]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

Now Russia is now the biggest threat "1980s policy?" ..WTF?

. He schooled Obamy on this point, and shut his ace down. We need more backbone, and we got it with Trump, but the sleezey Demon-crats are working this just like Obamy was trying to work Romney on that point. Obamy was using fear tactics against what he figured was the coward Americans who cringe at the thought of challenging Russia on anything, but here they are doing the opposite because the lies are changed in the game now. That was refreshing to see Romney show Obamy just how sleezey that he Obamy was in such warfare as was being conducted.

 

[beagle9]

intelligence agencies and still no proof. None.

It is all lies. That's how they try to divert attention from their fraudulent machinations meantime ratcheting up anti Russian sentiments. Two flies with one swat.

Now Russia is now the biggest threat "1980s policy?" ..WTF?

Russia is a very comfortable "threat" for a lot of reasons.
This year Pentagon claimed 4 times more money than last year!

The Pentagon’s claims that Russia and China are among the top challenges for the US is a justification to continue the flow of taxpayer’s money into major weapon systems and their corporate sponsors, Karen Kwiatkowski, retired US Air Force Lieutenant Colonel told RT.

US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carterannounced Tuesday that the Pentagon will request a $582.7 billion defense budget in order to maintain security (several times more than last year). According to Carter, there are five main challenges for the US to focus on Russia, Iran, China, North Korea and ISIS.

‘Acts of aggression come from Pentagon, not Russia or China’

So Obama is a dumbass and didn't know what he was talking about right?

. Yep because he thought Romney was a dumb ass, but that made him the dumb ass.

 

[tyroneweaver]

A: What evidence did they produce, or was it just politics?
B: Why the fuck do we have 17 intelligence agencies?

It makes it easier for the dems to muddy the waters.

 

[Iceweasel]

A: What evidence did they produce, or was it just politics?
B: Why the fuck do we have 17 intelligence agencies?

It makes it easier for the dems to muddy the waters.

And jobs. Lots and lots of jobs!

 

[Wry Catcher]

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas."
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

The question is:

Are these the same intelligence agencies that said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Clinton voted for the Iraq war based on that?

Agencies change: new leadership, new hires, retirements and circumstances all differ; see the influence of the neo conservatives (read the records of the Project for a New American Century) and the names of those establishment members who signed the Statement of Principles in June 1997, and how they have little of no influence today.

Context of 'June 3, 1997: PNAC Think Tank Issues Statement of Principles'