13 Times the Scientific Consensus Was WRONG

[Indeependent]

In a related note that will be Greek to the irrational denier fools piling on in this thread:

The consensuses were overturned on evidence, not on the fetishes and superstitions of a bunch of uneducated slobs.

Hear this Dingleberry doofus....

No scientist worth his salt ever calls anything settled.

Even the so called quick temp rise of the industrial age is just a guess based on best available data....with absolutely no legitimate conclusion that we know all of the potential
sources either of heat or CO2. In addition to that they always neglect the fact that the sun is gradually putting out more local BTUs with each passing orbit. Whatever effect we are having on the climate is apparently about to be overruled by a much larger driver.

Jo

That was an adorable bunch of toddlerish , irrelevant whining completely unrelated to my comments.

I will say it again:

A scientific consensus is not overturned by a bunch of uneducated slobs whining about their politics , superstitions, and fetishes. No, you crybabies are not presenting any real challenge to any accepted theories.

Get off your lazy, dumb asses and produce some science, or STFU. Simple as that.

but consensus has nothing to do with science,,,its just a bunch of over educated morons agreeing n something

Overpaid...

 

[JimBowie1958]

We know from the recent scandal that universities have no qualms about cheating as long as the money keeps coming in. It follows that university graduates who are fortunate enough to work in fields with lavish federal grants will fudge data to keep the federal grants coming in. As long as they have the liberal news media covering their crooked asses everybody gets rich on the taxpayers and nobody has to give back the money when they are proven wrong.

Our universities are infested with Marxists and have zero integrity.

Time to replace them for education purposes and convert them into an NFL farm system.

That is all they really are.

 

[Chuz Life]

Thread has me curious.

What is the scientific consensus on "when and how a human being's life begins?"

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is absolutely no proof that man produced CO2 is responsible for the ppm
Increase....

You say i know nothi g about you. That was incorrect.

I know you are embarrassingly ignorant of climate science and say very retarded things about it, like in the quote above.

Yessir, i know this about you for a fact.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Thread has me curious.

What is the scientific consensus on "when and how a human being's life begins?"

There isn't one. And you have asked all the same people the same question before. So no, you are not and were not "curious". You're just taling a shit in the thread

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We know from the recent scandal that universities have no qualms about cheating as long as the money keeps coming in.

Psst...hey genius....the consensus is among the entire global scientific community, not just among the women's studies teachers at Liberal, U. So ya sound like a goddamn moron.

 

[progressive hunter]

We know from the recent scandal that universities have no qualms about cheating as long as the money keeps coming in.

Psst...hey genius....the consensus is among the entire global scientific community, not just among the women's studies teachers at Liberal, U. So ya sound like a goddamn moron.

if its the entire global scientific community then wheres the list???

and again they use consensus because the science failed or they would have used it,,,

 

[cnm]

and again they use consensus because the science failed or they would have used it

They used science. Retards don't understand it.

 

[progressive hunter]

and again they use consensus because the science failed or they would have used it

They used science. Retards don't understand it.

then why did they need to come to a consensus???

just let the science speak for itself,,,,

 

[justoffal]

There is absolutely no proof that man produced CO2 is responsible for the ppm
Increase....

You say i know nothi g about you. That was incorrect.

I know you are embarrassingly ignorant of climate science and say very retarded things about it, like in the quote above.

Yessir, i know this about you for a fact.

You are an idiot....
And so are 90 percent of the climate worshippers who choose mantra over
Real scientific acumen.

So a bunch of climatologists have figured out that co2 concentrations are a function of total heat. Got some news for you chump that doesn't mean squat.

No branch of science exists as an island.

Geologists have also determined that Earth's main climate drivers are Solar and Volcanic.

Astronomers have also determined that
The sun is Gradually getting warmer.

Oceanographers have determined the the temperature of the ocean water determines
Total global ppm counts in the atmosphere.

So far snobs in climatology are the only ones who think their contribution is all powerful. Of course there are hundreds of legitimate
Scientists who disagree but they don't get the grants or the news coverage.

In any case that community has painted itself into a corner long ago by citing 400
Ppm as the point of no return. We hit that 3 years ago. So now what doofus?

Jo

 

[justoffal]

and again they use consensus because the science failed or they would have used it

They used science. Retards don't understand it.

then why did they need to come to a consensus???

just let the science speak for itself,,,,

These idiots don't realize that consensus in the scientific world is a synonym for " cherry picked "....

Jo

 

[cnm]

then why did they need to come to a consensus???

just let the science speak for itself,,,,

Ffs. The scientific community agrees the science has spoken for itself, that's why there is a consensus in the scientific community. It's hardly their fault you don't understand the science. Or the meaning of consensus.

 

[progressive hunter]

then why did they need to come to a consensus???

just let the science speak for itself,,,,

Ffs. The scientific community agrees the science has spoken for itself, that's why there is a consensus in the scientific community. It's hardly their fault you don't understand the science.

are you saying they dont understand what they did???


OH WAIT,,,the consensus is just that they did something but have no idea what it is,,,
OK got it

 

[skookerasbil]

Progressives never will get it. They continually respond with scientific arguments in these type threads!! Lol....talk about doing it wrong!

The public has obviously noticed all the Oooooops moments over the past 20 years and spend 8 months out of the year sporting nut sack warmers and parka's. They havent been impressed at all with the bomb throwing.

In the real world, the science isnt mattering because nobody is caring about climate change....volumes of evidence to support it too!!If people cared about the science, we'd be seeing tons of climate change action. Instead, we dont see dick s0ns!!

 

[justoffal]

then why did they need to come to a consensus???

just let the science speak for itself,,,,

Ffs. The scientific community agrees the science has spoken for itself, that's why there is a consensus in the scientific community. It's hardly their fault you don't understand the science. Or the meaning of consensus.

That's not True....at all.

Consensus means that a special interest group ran around to all the consenting opinions and put them on a " Cherry pick " list while ignoring and blacking out the dissenters. That is all it means.

Jo

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Geologists have also determined that Earth's main climate drivers are Solar and Volcanic.

Every major geological society on the planet endorses the scientific consensus. So, are they all ignorant of their own life's work, or all just lying? It's gotta be one or the other, so pick which retarded stance you are taking. Either way...ya look like an idiot.

You know less than nothing about any of this and should shut up immediately. You have no education or experience in any of these fields, and your opinion is worth less than nothing. Start producing some science to back up your superstitious vomiting, or STFU.

 

[progressive hunter]

Geologists have also determined that Earth's main climate drivers are Solar and Volcanic.

Every major geological society on the planet endorses the scientific consensus. So, are they all ignorant of their own life's work, or all just lying? It's gotta be one or the other, so pick which retarded stance you are taking. Either way...ya look like an idiot.

You know less than nothing about any of this and should shut up immediately. You have no education or experience in any of these fields, and your opinion is worth less than nothing. Start producing some science to back up your superstitious vomiting, or STFU.

so who declared them the experts???
they did,,,

anyone that says they are the experts should always be questioned,,,

and in this case its clear they are just makin shit up,,,

 

[justoffal]

Geologists have also determined that Earth's main climate drivers are Solar and Volcanic.

Every major geological society on the planet endorses the scientific consensus. So, are they all ignorant of their own life's work, or all just lying? It's gotta be one or the other, so pick which retarded stance you are taking. Either way...ya look like an idiot.

You know less than nothing about any of this and should shut up immediately. You have no education or experience in any of these fields, and your opinion is worth less than nothing. Start producing some science to back up your superstitious vomiting, or STFU.

First of all...
Fuck you....I definitely know more about this than you do.

1.) The scientific consensus is a myth.
It does not exist. Consensus is a rough synonym for OFFICIAL BULLSHIT.
2.) Climate scientists who have isolated themselves into a polarized group of
AGW believers are just one group of many.
3.) Major Geological societies? What the fuck are those?

Now then answer my question:

Since AGW isolationists have repeatedly claimed that 400 ppm is the point of no return and we have teacher that several years ago with nothing but increase on the horizon.

Now what Doofus?

( BTW your getting your ass kicked here)

Jo

 

[skookerasbil]

Debates on the science of climate change are akin to group navel contemplation sessions in 2019. The real question becomes, who is winning the debate outside of community message boards. Nothing else matters.

Progressives like to take bows in front of this banner of THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED BY A CONSENSUS! But so what? Does it transcend into any area of the world outside the science.....having any impact in the real world? Words don't mean dick..........but in terms of effecting behavior?

The answer is.............its not!

People say they are concerned about climate change........but they are concerned about many, many things in life. Are they concerned enough to move to any kind of action?


Well we all know the answer to that s0ns!!

 

[mamooth]

No scientist worth his salt ever calls anything settled.

Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, ....

Einstein here thinks the round earth theory isn't settled. What a maroon.

Even the so called quick temp rise of the industrial age is just a guess based on best available data....with absolutely no legitimate conclusion that we know all of the potential sources either of heat or CO2.

All the actual data says you just made up a load of horseshit. Faked it, you did. Tried to push a big fraud on us. You're forced to fake everything, because all the actual evidence always contradicts your cult idiocy.

In addition to that they always neglect the fact that the sun is gradually putting out more local BTUs with each passing orbit.

Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, ... where do you get this nonsense? The sun has been cooling since around 1970.

Whatever effect we are having on the climate is apparently about to be overruled by a much larger driver.

Your talent for being totally wrong every time is useful in one respect. If you say something, it's generally safe to assume the exact opposite is true.