Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
SuperConspiracyBrutha is ass hurt that they didn't stack the jury with a bunch of ignorant black tools looking for racial vengeance.
There was no Batson Challenge, as far as I can tell. Guess the prosecutors don't care.
You are one ignorant, racist POS. Are you so racist and stupid to believe none of the white jurors have an opinion or bias on this case. The 2 black folks you cited please tell me what makes their opinion ignorant. Basically alot of white jurors lied to get on the case and their racist lawyers did just what they needed to do to get them on the jury.The only thing we see here is blacks are dumb. From your article:
Defense attorneys fired back against the allegations of racial bias, arguing the prospective jurors were eliminated not because of the color of their skin, but because of their attitudes toward the three men charged with murder and their responses to questions during more than two weeks of jury selection.
Jason Sheffield, a lawyer for Travis McMichael, noted that Juror 199, a Black woman, had said, “They hunted him down and killed him like an animal. … The whole case was about racism.”
Laura Hogue, who represents Greg McMichael, cited answers given by Juror 253, another Black woman. “No one needs to have their life taken,” she said. “I believe it was wrong. … There should be another solution instead of ‘Bam!’”
You ignorant blacks have no idea that NO juror can have a bias in any case. The United States Constitution guarantees all citizens a right to a speedy trial heard by an unbiased jury. Apparently these blacks were biased before the trial even started.
^ Garbage conclusion based in bigotry & an insatiable need to race-bait.
Ahmaud Arbery case in Georgia: 11 white jurors and just 1 Black man seated for trial
Sparks flew in Brunswick, Georgia, during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors based on race. In the end, just one Black man made it onto the jury of 12. All the others...www.ajc.com
Sparks flew during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors because of their race.
We can see where this is going.
The fix is in.
They should call it "jury deselection" because they seat the panel randomly and they take the first 12 not stricken. So, it is almost impossible to rig it and it's likely that NO black people on the panel were stricken. They were just randomly seated in seats 20 to 48. Most likely, both prosecutors and defense lawyers had overlapping preemptory strikes.Out of 48 potential jurors 12 were black. Glynn County Georgia is 26% black. The defense used their 11 strikes on prospective black jurors which is their right by law. It was a fair selection process. You can’t add more blacks and usurp the law and the numbers just to satisfy someone’s racist quota.
My own opinion, given the current climate in this country to defund police, allow rioting, turn a blind eye to murder in our inner cities and to constantly play the race card at every opportunity the defense made a good choice.
There was no Batson Challenge, dude. There was NO BASIS for one. What else do you want?You are one ignorant, racist POS. Are you so racist and stupid to believe none of the white jurors have an opinion or bias on this case. The 2 black folks you cited please tell me what makes their opinion ignorant. Basically alot of white jurors lied to get on the case and their racist lawyers did just what they needed to do to get them on the jury.
Based on those comments during jury selection the black jurors already determined the McMichaels are guilty. Thats not a fair trial. Did the white jurors already determine guilt or innocence in their comments? Probably not.You are one ignorant, racist POS. Are you so racist and stupid to believe none of the white jurors have an opinion or bias on this case. The 2 black folks you cited please tell me what makes their opinion ignorant. Basically alot of white jurors lied to get on the case and their racist lawyers did just what they needed to do to get them on the jury.
You're going to look stupid when there's a conviction...lolAhmaud Arbery case in Georgia: 11 white jurors and just 1 Black man seated for trial
Sparks flew in Brunswick, Georgia, during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors based on race. In the end, just one Black man made it onto the jury of 12. All the others...
Sparks flew during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors because of their race.
We can see where this is going.
The fix is in.
How did the judge rule on their Batson challenges?Ahmaud Arbery case in Georgia: 11 white jurors and just 1 Black man seated for trial
Sparks flew in Brunswick, Georgia, during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors based on race. In the end, just one Black man made it onto the jury of 12. All the others...
Sparks flew during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors because of their race.
We can see where this is going.
The fix is in.
Not really.Interesting.
While Judge Walmsley agreed that there "appears to be intentional discrimination," the judge declined to change the racial makeup, saying he was limited in his ability to take action because defense attorneys were able to give nonracial reasons for their decisions to strike the potential Black jurors from thHow did the judge rule on their Batson challenges?
And, THAT is the law, ConspiracyBrutha.While Judge Walmsley agreed that there "appears to be intentional discrimination," the judge declined to change the racial makeup, saying he was limited in his ability to take action because defense attorneys were able to give nonracial reasons for their decisions to strike the potential Black jurors from th
Court cases are complicated things.
When we consider data, complex scenarios, times of day, occurrence/succession of events.
These things require higher levels of thought.
Would you want your life placed into the hands of a person with an 85 IQ?
The fewer Africanoids the better.
You are one ignorant, racist POS. Are you so racist and stupid to believe none of the white jurors have an opinion or bias on this case. The 2 black folks you cited please tell me what makes their opinion ignorant. Basically alot of white jurors lied to get on the case and their racist lawyers did just what they needed to do to get them on the jury.
Exactly.If I'm on a jury, they are guilty, white, black, Asian, it makes no difference. No racism
involved. If they are this far along in the process, they're guilty.
The take away, don't choose me to be on any jury. When I tell the judge
I can't be impartial, take my word for it.
The ONLY reason you claim they lied is the color of their skin, proving YOU are the racistYou are one ignorant, racist POS. Are you so racist and stupid to believe none of the white jurors have an opinion or bias on this case. The 2 black folks you cited please tell me what makes their opinion ignorant. Basically alot of white jurors lied to get on the case and their racist lawyers did just what they needed to do to get them on the jury.
So the defense is trying to make sure that jurors don't have a bias towards guilty? The prosecution does the same thing on the other side. Not remarkable, except to people who look for racism everywhere.
