Coincidence? I think not.
The ability of members of U.S. Congress to buy and sell stocks has been controversial over the years. One of its most prominent members made some purchases in December that could benefit from the new Biden administration. What Happened: It was revealed over the weekend that Speaker of the House...
finance.yahoo.com
President Joe Biden signed an executive order Monday to make all federal vehicles run on electricity and phase out those that run on gas.
www.breitbart.com
Nancy bought the stock options in December, not on January 25th. Only an idiot would think that buying stock in green energy companies would be a bad investment with a Democrat in the White House, so it's not like it was "insider news" at the time.
Joe Biden signed the Executive Order on January 25th, not January 26th - It's in your Breitbart Link, **** Boi. Your Breitbart article was published on the 26th, but the EO was signed on the 25th.
If this weak ass shit is the best you've got, it's gonna be a long, long 4 years for you, FuckBoi.
The attempt to make this in anyway the same as the insider trading that those two republican jackasses did is amusing.
It's what Republicans do with a Democrat in the White House. Benghazi had 7 investigations, all concluding that the Obama Administration did nothing wrong and there was no cover up. The loss of American life, could not have been prevented that night, once events were in motion. And yet, Republicans still believe that Hillary caused those deaths, and there was a coverup.
No one siad Hillary caused those deaths.
What bothered conservatives was the fact that Obama administration blamed an Americans right to free speech for the deaths.
Sure, the film was irresponsible....but not illegal.
But the administration chose to tell the world that our most sacred right, right to free speech is what caused those deaths.
When, In fact, it didnt.
That was un-American.
Umm, the Obama administration was blaming that video because it was the CIA's assessment that the video spurred the attack. About two weeks later, the CIA changed that assessment to it being a terrorist attack and Obama's administration stopped blaming the video.
Wrong. COMPLETELY wrong and insulting.
The CIA made no assessment at the beginning. They don't do that. It would be negligence.
The CIA puts together an AAR that usually takes days to complete...and then they submit a report. It includes video evaluation, witness testimony, cause of death study not to mention recon that sometimes takes days to collect, evaluate and assess.
So what you said is not only factually incorrect....but if fed to you by news media...it is propaganda and very dangerous.
The State department chose to blame the deaths on the video before having any report from any agency. That is a fact.
So, without the DoD, the CIA or the FBI offering their evaluation, the administration believed it best to blame an American exercising his first amendment right. Yes, he did so irresponsibly.....but he did not break the law.
Know your facts before you regurgitate propoganda.