You Have Awoken A Sleeping Giant

[JakeStarkey]

Of course it has, and you saying differently means nothing, Correll.

Are you saying a private institution of higher education can't manage their admissions as they wish.

You must be a socialist.

Of course it has not. And you saying differently means nothing. I have repeatedly explained my use of the data in that study, and you have never honestly or seriously addressed that. You have lied by misrepresenting what I AND the studies author(s) said. No, I did not say that a private institution can't manage their admissions as they wish. I am stating that there is anti-white discrimination in the way they manage their admission. Do you ever plan to be honest about anything?

I have clearly exposed your lying manipulation of the study. Now you act like a socialist because it makes you "feels" good to keep lying. You use the Ivy League as an example, which is stupid because it is private and can have any admissions they decide. If you don't like it, don't apply there. You need to start acting like an adult.

Private like a baker? They are just as vulnerable to AA, multiculturalism, diversity, ect as the rest of American society.

YOur pretense that they are not is a lie.

I have presented evidence that the result of the motivation, is a 300 point SAT bonus for Black Skin, as one limited example.

As discrimination in FAVOR of blacks for a limited resource, ie admission slots, equals discrimination AGAINST whites for that resource, my claim that serious anti-white discrimination exists is proven.

Your weak attempts to misrepresent either what I have said about the study (misusing conclusions) or what the author of the study has said (not agreeing with use of findings)

does NOT in any way debunk my point.

 

[Correll]

Of course it has, and you saying differently means nothing, Correll.

Are you saying a private institution of higher education can't manage their admissions as they wish.

You must be a socialist.

Of course it has not. And you saying differently means nothing. I have repeatedly explained my use of the data in that study, and you have never honestly or seriously addressed that. You have lied by misrepresenting what I AND the studies author(s) said. No, I did not say that a private institution can't manage their admissions as they wish. I am stating that there is anti-white discrimination in the way they manage their admission. Do you ever plan to be honest about anything?

I have clearly exposed your lying manipulation of the study. Now you act like a socialist because it makes you "feels" good to keep lying. You use the Ivy League as an example, which is stupid because it is private and can have any admissions they decide. If you don't like it, don't apply there. You need to start acting like an adult.

Private like a baker? They are just as vulnerable to AA, multiculturalism, diversity, ect as the rest of American society.

YOur pretense that they are not is a lie.

I have presented evidence that the result of the motivation, is a 300 point SAT bonus for Black Skin, as one limited example.

As discrimination in FAVOR of blacks for a limited resource, ie admission slots, equals discrimination AGAINST whites for that resource, my claim that serious anti-white discrimination exists is proven.

Your weak attempts to misrepresent either what I have said about the study (misusing conclusions) or what the author of the study has said (not agreeing with use of findings)

does NOT in any way debunk my point.

A 300 point bonus is nothing to dismiss.

There are white people walking around America today who were denied Elite College educations because their slot went to a FAR less qualified black person.

They might not realize that they were harmed by AA, ECT, but that does not change the fact that they were.

And that is just one limited example.

Ivy Leagues admissions are used as an example NOT because admission is especially targeted for Diversity/ect, but because the extensive documentation of the process makes it possible to see just how bad the anti-white discrimination is.


300 points on a 1600 point scale.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course it has, and you saying differently means nothing, Correll.

Are you saying a private institution of higher education can't manage their admissions as they wish.

You must be a socialist.

Of course it has not. And you saying differently means nothing. I have repeatedly explained my use of the data in that study, and you have never honestly or seriously addressed that. You have lied by misrepresenting what I AND the studies author(s) said. No, I did not say that a private institution can't manage their admissions as they wish. I am stating that there is anti-white discrimination in the way they manage their admission. Do you ever plan to be honest about anything?

I have clearly exposed your lying manipulation of the study. Now you act like a socialist because it makes you "feels" good to keep lying. You use the Ivy League as an example, which is stupid because it is private and can have any admissions they decide. If you don't like it, don't apply there. You need to start acting like an adult.

Private like a baker? They are just as vulnerable to AA, multiculturalism, diversity, ect as the rest of American society.

YOur pretense that they are not is a lie.

I have presented evidence that the result of the motivation, is a 300 point SAT bonus for Black Skin, as one limited example.

As discrimination in FAVOR of blacks for a limited resource, ie admission slots, equals discrimination AGAINST whites for that resource, my claim that serious anti-white discrimination exists is proven.

Your weak attempts to misrepresent either what I have said about the study (misusing conclusions) or what the author of the study has said (not agreeing with use of findings)

does NOT in any way debunk my point.

A 300 point bonus is nothing to dismiss.

There are white people walking around America today who were denied Elite College educations because their slot went to a FAR less qualified black person.

They might not realize that they were harmed by AA, ECT, but that does not change the fact that they were.

And that is just one limited example.

Ivy Leagues admissions are used as an example NOT because admission is especially targeted for Diversity/ect, but because the extensive documentation of the process makes it possible to see just how bad the anti-white discrimination is.


300 points on a 1600 point scale.

Now you are shifting your argument from Ivy League to "Elite College" without any evidence. And you saying it is not "just one limited example." You are so pwnd.

 

[Mac1958]

Ivy Leagues admissions are used as an example NOT because admission is especially targeted for Diversity/ect, but because the extensive documentation of the process makes it possible to see just how bad the anti-white discrimination is.


300 points on a 1600 point scale.

I don't know if your point is being disputed, but as an example:

Asian Americans would lose out under affirmative action

African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says. She points to the second column. “Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”

The last column draws gasps. Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.

“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,” Lee says.

“Zenme keyi,” one mother hisses in Chinese. How can this be possible?

The PC Police are fine with treating people differently based on the color of their skin.
.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The poll was challenged as flawed.

Your source is from October 2014.

From the link: A pedestrian walks near the Humanities Building at UCLA. California banned race-conscious affirmative action in 1996. (Los Angeles Times)

 

[Correll]

Of course it has not. And you saying differently means nothing. I have repeatedly explained my use of the data in that study, and you have never honestly or seriously addressed that. You have lied by misrepresenting what I AND the studies author(s) said. No, I did not say that a private institution can't manage their admissions as they wish. I am stating that there is anti-white discrimination in the way they manage their admission. Do you ever plan to be honest about anything?

I have clearly exposed your lying manipulation of the study. Now you act like a socialist because it makes you "feels" good to keep lying. You use the Ivy League as an example, which is stupid because it is private and can have any admissions they decide. If you don't like it, don't apply there. You need to start acting like an adult.

Private like a baker? They are just as vulnerable to AA, multiculturalism, diversity, ect as the rest of American society.

YOur pretense that they are not is a lie.

I have presented evidence that the result of the motivation, is a 300 point SAT bonus for Black Skin, as one limited example.

As discrimination in FAVOR of blacks for a limited resource, ie admission slots, equals discrimination AGAINST whites for that resource, my claim that serious anti-white discrimination exists is proven.

Your weak attempts to misrepresent either what I have said about the study (misusing conclusions) or what the author of the study has said (not agreeing with use of findings)

does NOT in any way debunk my point.

A 300 point bonus is nothing to dismiss.

There are white people walking around America today who were denied Elite College educations because their slot went to a FAR less qualified black person.

They might not realize that they were harmed by AA, ECT, but that does not change the fact that they were.

And that is just one limited example.

Ivy Leagues admissions are used as an example NOT because admission is especially targeted for Diversity/ect, but because the extensive documentation of the process makes it possible to see just how bad the anti-white discrimination is.


300 points on a 1600 point scale.

Now you are shifting your argument from Ivy League to "Elite College" without any evidence. And you saying it is not "just one limited example." You are so pwnd.

I linked to the academic study that provided the evidence you dishonest moron.

And I said this IS one limited example.

That you think you have won anything here is the delusions of a pathetic fool.

 

[Correll]

Ivy Leagues admissions are used as an example NOT because admission is especially targeted for Diversity/ect, but because the extensive documentation of the process makes it possible to see just how bad the anti-white discrimination is.


300 points on a 1600 point scale.

I don't know if your point is being disputed, but as an example:

Asian Americans would lose out under affirmative action

African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says. She points to the second column. “Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”

The last column draws gasps. Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.

“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,” Lee says.

“Zenme keyi,” one mother hisses in Chinese. How can this be possible?

The PC Police are fine with treating people differently based on the color of their skin.
.

Yes, a lot of these studies and reports focus on the penalty that Asians get.

Because talking about anti-white discrimination gets you lumped in with David Duke.

And no, that does not dispute my point. lt is simply a different study with slightly different parameters.

 

[Correll]

The poll was challenged as flawed.

Your source is from October 2014.

From the link: A pedestrian walks near the Humanities Building at UCLA. California banned race-conscious affirmative action in 1996. (Los Angeles Times)

LInk to the challenge to the poll.

And yes, there has been, for quite some time push back on the more blatant discrimination, and discrimination techniques.

BUT the underlying motives, ie Danger of Discrimination Lawsuits and a culture of Multi culturalism and Diversity, leads to an impossible but widespread society Conventional Wisdom.

Where we demand to see "Diversity" that reflects the overall population of the nation, which requires pro-black discrimination, while trying to avoid anti-white discrimination.

This is obviously impossible.

So the result is that institutions try to hide their discrimination and lie about it.

But in some cases, such as University Admissions, there is too much documentation, and the discrimination can be found if the data is collected and analyzed.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I linked to the academic study that provided the evidence you dishonest moron. And I said this IS one limited example. That you think you have won anything here is the delusions of a pathetic fool.

Those are your pathetic words, Correll. I tore to shreds your conclusions. You have not been able to recover. And, no, of course not, you don't get "just once more.": That's over forever.

 

[Tank]

AA is to make up for natures discrimination

 

[JakeStarkey]

"And yes, there has been, for quite some time push back on the more blatant discrimination, and discrimination techniques.

BUT the underlying motives, ie Danger of Discrimination Lawsuits and a culture of Multi culturalism and Diversity, leads to an impossible but widespread society Conventional Wisdom."

And thus we see the lunacy of White Nationalism on the loose.

The first sentence above notes what is in fact the balance in our laws.

The second demonstrates the fallacy of the mirror conclusion. In fact a "widespread society Convention Wisdom" describe the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant" monolithic society of 200 years in America. And that is to what Correll wants us to return.

 

[Correll]

I linked to the academic study that provided the evidence you dishonest moron. And I said this IS one limited example. That you think you have won anything here is the delusions of a pathetic fool.

Those are your pathetic words, Correll. I tore to shreds your conclusions. You have not been able to recover. And, no, of course not, you don't get "just once more.": That's over forever.

You lied about what I said.

YOu lied about what the study said.

You lied about what the one author of the study said.

That was NOT "tearing my conclusions to shreds" that was just you being a dick.

Blacks get a 300 sat bonus in admissions to Ivy League Universities.

That is anti-white discrimination.

You have been unable to honestly reply to that fact.

 

[Correll]

"And yes, there has been, for quite some time push back on the more blatant discrimination, and discrimination techniques.

BUT the underlying motives, ie Danger of Discrimination Lawsuits and a culture of Multi culturalism and Diversity, leads to an impossible but widespread society Conventional Wisdom."

And thus we see the lunacy of White Nationalism on the loose.

The first sentence above notes what is in fact the balance in our laws.

The second demonstrates the fallacy of the mirror conclusion. In fact a "widespread society Convention Wisdom" describe the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant" monolithic society of 200 years in America. And that is to what Correll wants us to return.

Mmm, what?

The first sentence discusses an ATTEMPT to find balance.

The second points out the complete failure of that attempt. As proven by the 300 point bonus for black skin.

Being against anti-white discrimination is NOT the same as wanting a Monolithic WASP society.

 

[Tank]

School is white peoples invention, school is a unnatural place for blacks

 

[JakeStarkey]

You misused the study, I pointed that out, and you are furious that yet again you are unmasked.

The Ivy League schools are private institutions, and that you disagree with them is your right but means nothing at all.

You want us to go back to the 1950s culturally, and that is not going to happen.

 

[Correll]

You misused the study, I pointed that out, and you are furious that yet again you are unmasked.

The Ivy League schools are private institutions, and that you disagree with them is your right but means nothing at all.

You want us to go back to the 1950s culturally, and that is not going to happen.

The data the study collected and analyzed is shocking and proof of anti-white discrimination in Ivy League Admissions.

You refuse to honestly address that.


Your attempt to distract from that with the Red Herring of them being Private Institutions is noted and not cared about.


The 1950s?

My point was that anti-white discrimination is real and widespread.

YOu have not addressed that, except with lies.

Such as equating NOT supporting anti-white discrimination with wanting to "Go back to the culture of the 1950s".

 

[JakeStarkey]

You have no point. You misused the study, as it said some creeps would do, which makes you a creep. There is no wide-spread discrimination or you could stat it easily.

And, yes, you do want to go back to a 1950s white Convention Wisdom.

Not going to happen.

 

[Correll]

You have no point. You misused the study, as it said some creeps would do, which makes you a creep. There is no wide-spread discrimination or you could stat it easily.

And, yes, you do want to go back to a 1950s white Convention Wisdom.

Not going to happen.

The study did not say that.

The one author, after the fact said that some people were using it in ways he disagreed with.

He did NOT renounce the studie's data.

Which show that blacks get a 300 sat point bonus in Ivy League Admissions.

I'm not sure how you would misuse that.

I can't believe that pointing out that that is anti-white discrimination is a misuse.

My point was that anti-white discrimination exists and is widespread.

YOu have not addressed that at all.

YOu have ran from it like a coward.

 

[JakeStarkey]

 

[Correll]

The study did not say that.

The one author, after the fact said that some people were using it in ways he disagreed with.

He did NOT renounce the studie's data.

Which show that blacks get a 300 sat point bonus in Ivy League Admissions.

I'm not sure how you would misuse that.

I can't believe that pointing out that that is anti-white discrimination is a misuse.

My point was that anti-white discrimination exists and is widespread.

YOu have not addressed that at all.

YOu have ran from it like a coward.