I'm not reading thisok, i think the rational peole on this board would agree no one has a right to stop the imam from building the mosque near ground zero.
but what is the downside for him to say, "i realize this is touching a sore spot for many new yorkers. with that in mind, we're moving it somewhere else"
who would be the big loser in that scenario?
Well, the New Yorkers you're referencing would be ill-informed. They'd essentially be saying: "we blame your religion for 9/11 and everyone associated with it." And, that's not right.
On the other hand, the New Yorkers are saying:
"We are treating you Islamofascist Headchopping cocksuckers this way because by insisting on defecating on our justified sensibilities you are proving that you are NOT the "peaceful" fucking Muslims you portray yourselves to be by using your Bogus Taqiyah Bullshit.
You are who we already know who you are: the fucking overwhelming number of Muslims of the Mid East (or Mid Eastern 0rigin) whom we saw on TV rejoicing and dancing on the streets (and undoubtedly in your homes) when the 9/11 tragedy occured. And, we are not uneducated fools , or Lieberrhoid enemies of America, who will fall for your Taqiyah BULLSHIT because we know about your Cultural and Political predilections.
Then state what the question of the Op ed:
"You can build a mosque in or around Ground Zero if you allow us to build a SINGLE Church, Synagogue or a Buddhist Temple ANYWHERE in Mecca or Medina.
HOWZABOUT THAT ??????
IS THAT A DEAL ????????? "
The above would test the SINCERITY of their Religious BULLSHIT !