It is US tradition to slaughter unarmed (or underdeveloped) populations in Asia, Africa and Latin America. How many examples would you like for me to provide?
At least thirty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is US tradition to slaughter unarmed (or underdeveloped) populations in Asia, Africa and Latin America. How many examples would you like for me to provide?
You’re uninformed. Maybe this will help.The U.S. did not carpet bomb "most of North Korea".
Except for early in the Korean War, the U.S. didn't even bomb North Korean cities wholesale
"Over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — 20 percent of the population," Air Force Gen. Curtis LeMay, head of the Strategic Air Command during the Korean War, told the Office of Air Force History in 1984. Dean Rusk, a supporter of the war and later secretary of state, said the United States bombed "everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of another." After running low on urban targets, U.S. bombers destroyed hydroelectric and irrigation dams in the later stages of the war, flooding farmland and destroying crops.
bomb volume is NOT what defines something as "carpet bombing"You’re uninformed. Maybe this will help.
Americans have forgotten what we did to North Korea
That act was this: In the early 1950s, during the Korean War, the US dropped more bombs on North Korea than it had dropped in the entire Pacific theater during World War II. This carpet bombing,
Yeah what defines it is what they called it at the time. Carpet bombing. Do you have any idea the number of civilians our military murdered?bomb volume is NOT what defines something as "carpet bombing"
Yeah what defines it is what they called it at the time. Carpet bombing. Do you have any idea the number of civilians our military murdered?
Much like was done to the Germans and Japanese in WWII and the Vietnamese and Iraqis and…
See a pattern yet?
Yeah if you’re a fucking psychopath.Killing large numbers of civilians during a war is not necessarily a bad thing.
Yeah if you’re a fucking psychopath.
Yeah you’re just fucking crazy.psychopathy hasn't a thing to do with it.
There Is No Such Thing As a Non-Combatant in a Combat Zone.Yeah if you’re a fucking psychopath.
Seems to me purposely targeting civilians would be a serial killer's dream. Many troops that have witnessed or killed people during war have serious mental health problems directly caused by it.psychopathy hasn't a thing to do with it.
Seems to me purposely targeting civilians would be a serial killer's dream. Many troops that have witnessed or killed people during war have serious mental health problems directly caused by it.
You're wrong on more levels than I can count.
Killing civilians is largely the entire point of war
My dad purposely killed civilians during the Korean War and he was none the worse for wear due to it.
Yes, I understand. It's the power of superior propaganda, censorship, inferior educational system & geographic isolation .... and of course, dupes prepared to spread their lies for a price and/or coercion. There are only a few examples where the US has been "the good guy" but Americans don't know that. How can they know? They are indoctrinated to believe that any opposing view of the US is dangerous. Their fear hasn't subsided since WW II Hollywood films because the rhetoric hasn't changed to this very day.Somehow a majority of Americans are unaware of the war crimes their government has committed, but they know all about war crimes of nations their government opposes.
You require thirty to be convinced or is it that you are already aware of at least thirty?At least thirty.
NATO has no international jurisdiction. Without UN authorisation the bombing of Yugoslavia was illegal. Anyway, NATO is American based so you could say, "Bill Clinton gave himself the authorization to bomb Yugoslavia".NATO authorized Bill Clinton to bomb Yugoslavia ...
True, for sure.... to deflect attention from his peculiar sexual adventures so anything is possible if the media justifies it.
You require thirty to be convinced or is it that you are already aware of at least thirty?
the first one? Since I am a veteran myself let us begin with Vietnam.the first
the first one? Since I am a veteran myself let us begin with Vietnam.