Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
NAMBLA does not-for all practical purposes exist anymore . Your bringing up an anecdotal case of a pervert who wants to prey on children is worthless and pointless . He and those like him are not gay, they are pedophiles and pederasts. Gay people have age appropriate relationships, these creeps usually are unable to. You're implying that gay and pedophile is interchangeable is disgusting and ignorant
What are you talking about? Are you making the ridiculous claim that children are coerced into transitioning at an early age? A few idiot parents may do so, give into a child's wishes before they are able to give informed consent, but the medical community is highly unlikely to acquiesce unless the parents find some unethical quack to do their bidding. Do you ever stop and think? Do you ever do some research before you spout off?
And why would we care as long as it's a free choice?Homosexuality is the gateway behavior that leads to sick and abnormal sexual perversions..........
Homosexuality doesn't lead to any kind of behavior other than homosexuality. But, once homosexuality is accepted as normal behavior it absolutely opens the door for any other kind of abnormal behavior to demand its own acceptance.
Not so sure about that, because at some point a majority of homosexuals will say "uh whoa, too far thier buddy." It happened previously with NAMBLA, and I doubt a majority will get on the incest/beastiality bandwagon.
Now plural marriage on the other hand is something we may see next.
Let me get this right. I just posted a history of the gay movements relationship to pedophiles and documented the social and political evolution since the 70. Then you post some antiquated bullshit FROM THE 70'S which may or may not have any basis in reality . Give me a fucking break!And I said that is ancient history:I never said that every "gay person" is a pedophile or child molester - I said that the LGBT+++ movement has documented links to NAMBLA and other pedophilia organizations.
I vehemently disagree with their philosophy, as do the vast majority of adults, both gay and straight. Children do not have the mental or emotional capacity to make those choices and when an adult is involved, there is a high probability that the relationship will be coercive and unequal. You will see that nowhere in this lengthy piece is NAMBLA identified as a gay organization, nor does the organization itself even mention the issue of being gay.NAMBLA. It was spawned by the early gay rights movement but what is left of it today -and that isn't much - is not a gay organization and has been rejected by gay advocacy groups:
NAMBLA describes itself as a "support group for intergenerational relationships," and uses the slogan "sexual freedom for all." According to the group's web site, its aim is to "support the rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom they wish to share and enjoy their bodies." Google Search of NAMBLA's IP
History Brief history of the modern childlove movement
NAMBLA emerged from the tumultuous political atmosphere of the 1970s, particularly from the leftist wing of the Gay Liberation movement which followed the 1969 Stonewall Riots in New York City. Although discussion of gay adult-minor sex did take place, gay rights groups immediately following the Stonewall Riot were more concerned with issues of police harassment, nondiscrimination in employment, health care and other areas.
These were desperate days for the fledgling gay rights movement. Even then, the NAMBLA was consider a fringe group within the gay community
Ostracism
Some gay rights groups immediately following "Stonewall Inn", perceived age-of-consent laws as governmental tools to suppress homosexual behavior rather than as the safeguards against the sexual abuse of small children that they claimed to be. In many states that didn't explicitly criminalize homosexual behavior (the sodomy laws), age-of-consent laws were significantly lower for heterosexual couples than for homosexual couples. For example, in the state of Massachusetts, "Lawrence v. Texas", the age of consent for heterosexual couples was as low as 13 (with parental approval) but was 18 for homosexual men.
The relative acceptance or indifference to opposition of the age-of-consent began to change at the same time as accusations that gays were child pornographers and child molesters became common. Judianne Densen-Gerber, founder of the New York drug rehabilitation center Odyssey House, argued that gays were responsible for child pornography. In 1977 former beauty queen Anita Bryant staked a similar position, starting the "Save Our Children" campaign. "The recruitment of our children," she argued, "is absolutely necessary for the survival and growth of homosexuality."
You are dishonestly, or perhaps ignorantly, relying on ancient history by invoking NAMBLA
In 1980 a group called the “Lesbian Caucus – Lesbian Gay Pride March Committee” distributed a hand-out urging women to split from the annual New York City Gay Pride March because the organizing committee had supposedly been dominated by NAMBLA and its supporters. The next year, after some lesbians threatened to picket, the Cornell University gay group Gay PAC (Gay People at Cornell) rescinded its invitation to NAMBLA founder David Thorstad to be the keynote speaker at the annual May Gay Festival. And in the following years, gay rights groups attempted to block NAMBLA’s participation in gay pride parades, prompting Harry Hay to wear a sign proclaiming “NAMBLA walks with me” as he participated in a 1986 gay pride march in Los Angeles.
Thus by the mid-1980s, NAMBLA was virtually alone in its positions and found itself politically isolated. Gay rights organizations, burdened by accusations of child recruitment and child abuse, had abandoned the radicalism of their early years and had "retreat[ed] from the idea of a more inclusive politics," opting instead to appeal more to the mainstream. Support for "groups perceived as being on the fringe of the gay community," such as NAMBLA, vanished in the process. Today almost all gay rights groups disavow any ties to NAMBLA, voice disapproval of its objectives, and attempt to prevent NAMBLA from having a role in gay and lesbian rights events.
Here is more:
Gregory King of the Human Rights Campaign later said that "NAMBLA is not a gay organization ... They are not part of our community and we thoroughly reject their efforts to insinuate that pedophilia is an issue related to gay and lesbian civil rights." NAMBLA responded by claiming that "man/boy love is by definition homosexual," that "man/boy lovers are part of the gay movement and central to gay history and culture," and that "homosexuals denying that it is 'not gay' to be attracted to adolescent boys are just as ludicrous as heterosexuals saying it's 'not heterosexual' to be attracted to adolescent girls."
And more:
In 1994 the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) adopted a "Position Statement Regarding NAMBLA" saying GLAAD "deplores the North American Man Boy Love Association's (NAMBLA) goals, which include advocacy for sex between adult men and boys and the removal of legal protections for children. These goals constitute a form of child abuse and are repugnant to GLAAD." Also in 1994 the Board of Directors of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) adopted a resolution on NAMBLA that said: "NGLTF condemns all abuse of minors, both sexual and any other kind, perpetrated by adults. Accordingly, NGLTF condemns the organizational goals of NAMBLA and any other such organization."
Today
More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts. NAMBLA maintains a web site at NAMBLA that shows addresses in New York and San Francisco and a phone contact in New York, and offers publications for sale, including the NAMBLA Bulletin.
NAMBLA is identified as a lobby group in Jon Stewart's America: The Book A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction (2004), and is also alluded to on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, often tagged on to an existing lobby group's acronym for the parody.
Gay rights groups opposed to NAMBLA contend that their reason for disavowing NAMBLA has always been their sharing of the general public's disdain for pedophilia and child sexual abuse (as expressed in issues statements). These gay rights groups reject NAMBLA's claims of an analogy between the campaign for gay and lesbian equality and the abolition of age-of-consent laws, and view NAMBLA's rhetoric about "the sexual rights of youth" as a cover for its members' "real agenda".
Now read this and tell me that they are not a bunch of crazy sick fucks. I will tell you that few if any gay men agree with this tripe: Frequently Asked Questions About NAMBLA and Man/Boy Love
Give the NAMBLA shit a rest!
Selling Homosexuality to America and the World [https://www.regent.edu/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v14n2/Vol. 14, No. 2, 8 Rondeau.pdf] , at the initial stages of the campaign in the 1970s, seemed an impossible task. The concept of Gay Marriage for instance - Even the most functionally ignorant Liberal would have scoffed at the idea .Today , nearly 40 years later it's becoming a reality. What the electorate has rejected time and time again the Gay and Liberal activists have been forcing on society, against the will of the people, through Liberal infested Kangaroo judicial systems.
Promote Gay Privilege via "non-discrimination laws"
Demand public funds directed towards mounting homosexual problems
Force "gay marriage" on society
Repeal all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit.
[1972 Gay Rights Platform]
Repeal all legislative provisions that restrict the age of persons entering into a marriage unit.
Repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent. [6]
Destroy all Sexual Morality
Recruit Children
Promote the gay agenda in schools [7]
Infiltrate and Commandeer Youth Organizations [8]
Homosexual adoption via "non-discrimination laws"
Attack and destabilize non-compliant Youth Organizations [9]
Repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent. [1972 Gay Rights Platform]
Stifle Free Speech of any opposed to Gay Privilege [Jamming and Censorship]
Ban psychological Treatment for those seeking to escape Homosexuality [10]
Ban psychological Treatment for children confused by homosexual issues
Expedite the disintegration of Religious Institutions
Expedite the Disintegration of the Family Structure
Promote disobedience/disrespect of all non-gay / non-compliant Parental figures Emasculate , trivialize and slander the father image [A continuation from Radical Feminist Fascism]
Ridicule and promote a undesirable portrayal of the traditional mother image [A continuation from Radical Feminist Fascism]
Gay Agenda Defined
Hey Skippy that's a quote from the 70s --- See the name at the end ? - See the quotation marks -most people are a tad brighter than your sorry ass in fact you are one retarded little jerk off. The topic being bestiality / St. Bernards yada yada yada you think you're starting to understand - no of course not cause you don't think - periodGive me a fucking break with that ignorant horseshit! Gay people can and do have children? What the fuck do you mean by "recruit" ? Plenty of gay people- the majority really were raised by straight parents . Anita Bryant?? That explains a lot about you.' As a mother, I know that homosexuals cannot biologically reproduce children; therefore, they must recruit our children. If gays are granted rights, next we'll have to give rights to prostitutes and to people who sleep with St. Bernards' - Anita Bryant
Hey asshole who the Hell are you to criticize someone for not doing research ?! .... pluck the hair from outta you teeth and wipe the cum off your chin b4 you beginWhat are you talking about? Are you making the ridiculous claim that children are coerced into transitioning at an early age? A few idiot parents may do so, give into a child's wishes before they are able to give informed consent, but the medical community is highly unlikely to acquiesce unless the parents find some unethical quack to do their bidding. Do you ever stop and think? Do you ever do some research before you spout off?Children do not have the mental or emotional capacity to make those choices and when an adult is involved, there is a high probability that the relationship will be coercive and unequal
Except in cases of gender dysphoria , where the exact same probability also exists
~S~
Guess what...homosexuals don't get to jump off the bandwagonThe majority of the people in the main who support normalization of homosexual relationships will hop off the bandwagon for bestiality, and incest, and other things. Even a majority of homosexuals jump of the bandwagon on these items.
Are you making the ridiculous claim that children are coerced into transitioning at an early age?
A few idiot parents may do so, give into a child's wishes before they are able to give informed consent, but the medical community is highly unlikely to acquiesce unless the parents find some unethical quack to do their bidding.
Do you ever stop and think?
Do you ever do some research before you spout off?
Six years ago, were we hearing of “transgender children”, as young as five or younger, being brainwashed into thinking that they are the opposite of their actual sex, and being prepared to “transition”. Six years ago, would any of us have believed it would happen? Yet, here we are.
.Offering sex-changing treatment to kids younger than 18 raises ethical concerns, and their parents' motives need to be closely examined, said Dr. Margaret Moon, a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' bioethics committee
Some are labeled with "gender identity disorder," a psychiatric diagnosis. But Spack is among doctors who think that's a misnomer. Emerging research suggests they may have brain differences more similar to the opposite sex.
Former transgender activist warns of deadly, disturbing transition dangers: ‘We are manufacturing transgender kids’Earlier this year, it was revealed that five people working at Britain’s only NHS transgender clinic had quit after children as young as three were being through unnecessary gender reassignment treatment.
Britain's First Transgender Couple to Allow Their 5-Year-Old Child To Begin Transition
Earlier this year, it was revealed that five people working at Britain’s only NHS transgender clinic had quit after children as young as three were being through unnecessary gender reassignment treatment
sooooweeeeeeeEEEEeeee....
~S~
Is that Sarah Palin?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And why would we care as long as it's a free choice?Homosexuality is the gateway behavior that leads to sick and abnormal sexual perversions..........
Homosexuality doesn't lead to any kind of behavior other than homosexuality. But, once homosexuality is accepted as normal behavior it absolutely opens the door for any other kind of abnormal behavior to demand its own acceptance.
Not so sure about that, because at some point a majority of homosexuals will say "uh whoa, too far thier buddy." It happened previously with NAMBLA, and I doubt a majority will get on the incest/beastiality bandwagon.
Now plural marriage on the other hand is something we may see next.
Why would the courts force people into polygamy?And why would we care as long as it's a free choice?Homosexuality is the gateway behavior that leads to sick and abnormal sexual perversions..........
Homosexuality doesn't lead to any kind of behavior other than homosexuality. But, once homosexuality is accepted as normal behavior it absolutely opens the door for any other kind of abnormal behavior to demand its own acceptance.
Not so sure about that, because at some point a majority of homosexuals will say "uh whoa, too far thier buddy." It happened previously with NAMBLA, and I doubt a majority will get on the incest/beastiality bandwagon.
Now plural marriage on the other hand is something we may see next.
When courts impose it on people it's not a free choice.
Are you really so stupid as to think that one loose nut represents the entire Democratic party?You can simply admit that the Democrat Party is simply the low-life party.
Where are the rest of the rest of the Democrats, denouncing the abject sexual depravity openly promoted by some Democrats? I only ever see them, and you defending this crap, and saying that there's something very wrong with those of us who stand against it.
I guarantee you that if any Republican advocated anything like the depraved perversions that you Democrats advocate, almost all the rest of us would be very quick to denounce and condemn him, and make it as clear as we can that he doesn't speak for us.
Why would the courts force people into polygamy?And why would we care as long as it's a free choice?Homosexuality is the gateway behavior that leads to sick and abnormal sexual perversions..........
Homosexuality doesn't lead to any kind of behavior other than homosexuality. But, once homosexuality is accepted as normal behavior it absolutely opens the door for any other kind of abnormal behavior to demand its own acceptance.
Not so sure about that, because at some point a majority of homosexuals will say "uh whoa, too far thier buddy." It happened previously with NAMBLA, and I doubt a majority will get on the incest/beastiality bandwagon.
Now plural marriage on the other hand is something we may see next.
When courts impose it on people it's not a free choice.
Making it legal is not forcing anyone to do it.Why would the courts force people into polygamy?And why would we care as long as it's a free choice?Homosexuality doesn't lead to any kind of behavior other than homosexuality. But, once homosexuality is accepted as normal behavior it absolutely opens the door for any other kind of abnormal behavior to demand its own acceptance.
Not so sure about that, because at some point a majority of homosexuals will say "uh whoa, too far thier buddy." It happened previously with NAMBLA, and I doubt a majority will get on the incest/beastiality bandwagon.
Now plural marriage on the other hand is something we may see next.
When courts impose it on people it's not a free choice.
Force States to issue licenses for multiple partner marriages.
Muslim was goooood this year !
Making it legal is not forcing anyone to do it.Why would the courts force people into polygamy?And why would we care as long as it's a free choice?Not so sure about that, because at some point a majority of homosexuals will say "uh whoa, too far thier buddy." It happened previously with NAMBLA, and I doubt a majority will get on the incest/beastiality bandwagon.
Now plural marriage on the other hand is something we may see next.
When courts impose it on people it's not a free choice.
Force States to issue licenses for multiple partner marriages.
Unless you are referring to laws forcing religious bigots to accept that other folks have freedom of choice too.
