Yale Economics Professor Advocates for "Mandatory Euthanasia" of the Elderly

[Lord Long Rod]

I hope this weirdo is on a watch-list with a law enforcement agency somewhere. I fully understand the authentic academic mind - pure brilliance coupled with not enough common sense to get in out of the rain. Things become thought exercises notwithstanding the otherwise harsh consequences that would result from application. In an undergraduate physics class years ago we studied nuclear weapons. The thermonuclear explosive device is a work of sheer engineering brilliance. In fact, it is just beautiful. I realized readily how physicists and engineers could get enthusiastic about working in the nuclear program despite the fact that success meant having the ability to stockpile weapons that could blow up the Earth many times over. Academics have a certain disconnect. Frankly, this is a good thing, in my opinion, as it allows the subject to engage in a pure academic pursuit without regard to things that may induce bias.

Now, all that said, either this Yale prof is one of those brilliant academics whose handlers gave a little too much slack leash to, or he is a fucking menace and needs to be evaluated for psychosis and anti-social behavior. Imagine touting mass murder of the elderly to solve any problem. Back in my day we had a term for such craziness. We would say that he is one "fucked up motherfucker". But in his brilliant, emotionally retarded head, obviously this is the solution. It's like the super intelligent just have zero capacity to consider and evaluate ethics. They are like dogs. They lack certain characteristics that set us apart from the animals.

Moreover, given that economics is said to be a social science, and Yale has a soulless automaton dispensing such ideas to the young minds of mush, this is an absolute travesty. It is sick. It is unhinged. And it is absolutely not the least bit surprising given today's state of higher education.

Yale professor: "Mandatory euthanasia" will be on the table

hotair.com

 

[JoeC]

As long as Brandon goes first

 

[ReinyDays]

It's retirees that are ruining Social Security ...

 

[iamwhatiseem]

China's Minister of Economics alluded to legalized elderly euthanasia about 10 years ago
Even though euthanasia is "illegal" * in China, it happens all the time.

* Like many laws in China, it is illegal when they say it is. And not when they say it isn't.

 

[Donald H]

From a Canadian POV, it can't be mandatory, but it 'can' be voluntary.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And suddenly all the Gen X'rs turned to the nearest Boomer and smiled.

 

[Lisa558]

I hope this weirdo is on a watch-list with a law enforcement agency somewhere. I fully understand the authentic academic mind - pure brilliance coupled with not enough common sense to get in out of the rain. Things become thought exercises notwithstanding the otherwise harsh consequences that would result from application. In an undergraduate physics class years ago we studied nuclear weapons. The thermonuclear explosive device is a work of sheer engineering brilliance. In fact, it is just beautiful. I realized readily how physicists and engineers could get enthusiastic about working in the nuclear program despite the fact that success meant having the ability to stockpile weapons that could blow up the Earth many times over. Academics have a certain disconnect. Frankly, this is a good thing, in my opinion, as it allows the subject to engage in a pure academic pursuit without regard to things that may induce bias.

Now, all that said, either this Yale prof is one of those brilliant academics whose handlers gave a little too much slack leash to, or he is a fucking menace and needs to be evaluated for psychosis and anti-social behavior. Imagine touting mass murder of the elderly to solve any problem. Back in my day we had a term for such craziness. We would say that he is one "fucked up motherfucker". But in his brilliant, emotionally retarded head, obviously this is the solution. It's like the super intelligent just have zero capacity to consider and evaluate ethics. They are like dogs. They lack certain characteristics that set us apart from the animals.

Moreover, given that economics is said to be a social science, and Yale has a soulless automaton dispensing such ideas to the young minds of mush, this is an absolute travesty. It is sick. It is unhinged. And it is absolutely not the least bit surprising given today's state of higher education.

Yale professor: "Mandatory euthanasia" will be on the table

hotair.com

“Mandatory euthanasia” - formerly called MURDER. In their Utopia, the Democrat Socialists have little use for people who are past their ability to procreate or work.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Hey hey lets not just push this idea aside. Wait, oh you're not talking about my Mother In Law? Never mind.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I hope this weirdo is on a watch-list with a law enforcement agency somewhere. I fully understand the authentic academic mind - pure brilliance coupled with not enough common sense to get in out of the rain. Things become thought exercises notwithstanding the otherwise harsh consequences that would result from application. In an undergraduate physics class years ago we studied nuclear weapons. The thermonuclear explosive device is a work of sheer engineering brilliance. In fact, it is just beautiful. I realized readily how physicists and engineers could get enthusiastic about working in the nuclear program despite the fact that success meant having the ability to stockpile weapons that could blow up the Earth many times over. Academics have a certain disconnect. Frankly, this is a good thing, in my opinion, as it allows the subject to engage in a pure academic pursuit without regard to things that may induce bias.

Now, all that said, either this Yale prof is one of those brilliant academics whose handlers gave a little too much slack leash to, or he is a fucking menace and needs to be evaluated for psychosis and anti-social behavior. Imagine touting mass murder of the elderly to solve any problem. Back in my day we had a term for such craziness. We would say that he is one "fucked up motherfucker". But in his brilliant, emotionally retarded head, obviously this is the solution. It's like the super intelligent just have zero capacity to consider and evaluate ethics. They are like dogs. They lack certain characteristics that set us apart from the animals.

Moreover, given that economics is said to be a social science, and Yale has a soulless automaton dispensing such ideas to the young minds of mush, this is an absolute travesty. It is sick. It is unhinged. And it is absolutely not the least bit surprising given today's state of higher education.

Yale professor: "Mandatory euthanasia" will be on the table

hotair.com

.


What is truly bizarre to me is that this subhuman ghoul is genetically Japanese.

I shared so many happy years with my American-born Japanese husband and his first and second generation Japanese parents. I was always inspired by the respect and tender regard with which my husband cared for his parents.

I hope this animal's parents are dead and cannot hear the filth coming out of it.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

“Mandatory euthanasia” - formerly called MURDER. In their Utopia, the Democrat Socialists have little use for people who are past their ability to procreate or work.

.

They are filth.

.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

.

They are filth.

.

I love the phrase "Democratic Socialism".
It is like saying "I am a Libertarian Fascist"

 

[jwoodie]

Technically, we have the ability to keep someone alive (brain activity) for 150+ years. At some point, we are going to have to decide when to pull the plug.

 

[Independentthinker]

I hope this weirdo is on a watch-list with a law enforcement agency somewhere. I fully understand the authentic academic mind - pure brilliance coupled with not enough common sense to get in out of the rain. Things become thought exercises notwithstanding the otherwise harsh consequences that would result from application. In an undergraduate physics class years ago we studied nuclear weapons. The thermonuclear explosive device is a work of sheer engineering brilliance. In fact, it is just beautiful. I realized readily how physicists and engineers could get enthusiastic about working in the nuclear program despite the fact that success meant having the ability to stockpile weapons that could blow up the Earth many times over. Academics have a certain disconnect. Frankly, this is a good thing, in my opinion, as it allows the subject to engage in a pure academic pursuit without regard to things that may induce bias.

Now, all that said, either this Yale prof is one of those brilliant academics whose handlers gave a little too much slack leash to, or he is a fucking menace and needs to be evaluated for psychosis and anti-social behavior. Imagine touting mass murder of the elderly to solve any problem. Back in my day we had a term for such craziness. We would say that he is one "fucked up motherfucker". But in his brilliant, emotionally retarded head, obviously this is the solution. It's like the super intelligent just have zero capacity to consider and evaluate ethics. They are like dogs. They lack certain characteristics that set us apart from the animals.

Moreover, given that economics is said to be a social science, and Yale has a soulless automaton dispensing such ideas to the young minds of mush, this is an absolute travesty. It is sick. It is unhinged. And it is absolutely not the least bit surprising given today's state of higher education.

Yale professor: "Mandatory euthanasia" will be on the table

hotair.com

Sounds like vote suppression to me. If you can't beat 'em, kill 'em.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

It's retirees that are ruining Social Security ...

Not that young idiots are aborting their children more than having them. 6 children per family was the ratio back when SS was created, that was more than enough future workers to keep the Ponzi Scheme going. Today it is 1.2 children per family(how do you have 2/10th of a child, i will never know) so SS can not sustain itself.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Technically, we have the ability to keep someone alive (brain activity) for 150+ years. At some point, we are going to have to decide when to pull the plug.

Of course if we just have our civil war and reduce the US population of lazy progressive assholes by 50% then there will be plenty of SS to go around. And less on welfare also.

 

[Marener]

I hope this weirdo is on a watch-list with a law enforcement agency somewhere. I fully understand the authentic academic mind - pure brilliance coupled with not enough common sense to get in out of the rain. Things become thought exercises notwithstanding the otherwise harsh consequences that would result from application. In an undergraduate physics class years ago we studied nuclear weapons. The thermonuclear explosive device is a work of sheer engineering brilliance. In fact, it is just beautiful. I realized readily how physicists and engineers could get enthusiastic about working in the nuclear program despite the fact that success meant having the ability to stockpile weapons that could blow up the Earth many times over. Academics have a certain disconnect. Frankly, this is a good thing, in my opinion, as it allows the subject to engage in a pure academic pursuit without regard to things that may induce bias.

Now, all that said, either this Yale prof is one of those brilliant academics whose handlers gave a little too much slack leash to, or he is a fucking menace and needs to be evaluated for psychosis and anti-social behavior. Imagine touting mass murder of the elderly to solve any problem. Back in my day we had a term for such craziness. We would say that he is one "fucked up motherfucker". But in his brilliant, emotionally retarded head, obviously this is the solution. It's like the super intelligent just have zero capacity to consider and evaluate ethics. They are like dogs. They lack certain characteristics that set us apart from the animals.

Moreover, given that economics is said to be a social science, and Yale has a soulless automaton dispensing such ideas to the young minds of mush, this is an absolute travesty. It is sick. It is unhinged. And it is absolutely not the least bit surprising given today's state of higher education.

Yale professor: "Mandatory euthanasia" will be on the table

hotair.com

Your OP is not honest.
The professor says it will come up. He did not advocate for it.

He's talking about a very serious issue including population contraction and the effect that it will have on society. We need to be having this conversation because it's a problem we don't know how to address and so far we are just ignoring it.

 

[easyt65]

I hope this weirdo is on a watch-list with a law enforcement agency somewhere. I fully understand the authentic academic mind - pure brilliance coupled with not enough common sense to get in out of the rain. Things become thought exercises notwithstanding the otherwise harsh consequences that would result from application. In an undergraduate physics class years ago we studied nuclear weapons. The thermonuclear explosive device is a work of sheer engineering brilliance. In fact, it is just beautiful. I realized readily how physicists and engineers could get enthusiastic about working in the nuclear program despite the fact that success meant having the ability to stockpile weapons that could blow up the Earth many times over. Academics have a certain disconnect. Frankly, this is a good thing, in my opinion, as it allows the subject to engage in a pure academic pursuit without regard to things that may induce bias.

Now, all that said, either this Yale prof is one of those brilliant academics whose handlers gave a little too much slack leash to, or he is a fucking menace and needs to be evaluated for psychosis and anti-social behavior. Imagine touting mass murder of the elderly to solve any problem. Back in my day we had a term for such craziness. We would say that he is one "fucked up motherfucker". But in his brilliant, emotionally retarded head, obviously this is the solution. It's like the super intelligent just have zero capacity to consider and evaluate ethics. They are like dogs. They lack certain characteristics that set us apart from the animals.

Moreover, given that economics is said to be a social science, and Yale has a soulless automaton dispensing such ideas to the young minds of mush, this is an absolute travesty. It is sick. It is unhinged. And it is absolutely not the least bit surprising given today's state of higher education.

Yale professor: "Mandatory euthanasia" will be on the table

hotair.com

I think he was just talking specifically about applying this idea to the WH & CONGRESS.

Half the problem is the massive number of corrupt, criminal, self-serving, racist, treasonous, millionaire, old-as-dirt politicians who regise to leave.

Biden, of course, tops the list, with Feinstein, Sanders, Pelosi, and orgers right there.

 

[struth]

The Dems have been advocating for Death Panels for years....here's Paul Krugman discussing it

 

[Lisa558]

That Emanuel guy - not Rahm, but the brother - originally wanted to give elderly people the vaccine last. He acknowledged that they were most at risk of death, but said they weren’t as valuable to society as younger person.

 

[JoeC]

I can see all of the environmentalist whack jobs quietly cheering the death toll of a natural disaster. Gaia is pleased.