WoW!!! Even The FOXNEWS Calls Out Ryan's Speech As Nothing But A Bag Of Bogus

[Dick Tuck]

Got to laugh this morning. All over the media, "Ryan lies! Fact Checks!" Sally Kohn and Ezra Klein. Now THAT'S funny, fact check!

A Matter of Motivated 'Reasoning' - Room for Debate - NYTimes.com

you have never been one to recognise facts Annie

that is why your party is dying.

You lying little herpes scab. The Democrats have been growing, while the GOP has been shrinking.

 

[Conservative]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

Tuck, You don't know very much about Fox. This isn't a big deal at all. They had two opposing views as they usually do. One was from the Fox news contributer and writer, Sally Kohn which elates you so very much and the opposing view was from Matt Kibbe, also a writer for Fox:

Ryan’s speech builds trust among grassroots conservatives
Ryan

Knowing full well you won't bother to read it, I put it here for others to read and comprehend. lol.

It was an easy mistake for you to make, so don't feel badly. The network you are used to watch I'm assuming never puts both sides of an issue out there for viewers to learn and decide for themselves.

Now, do you understand?

I know that FOX is in the pocket of the right wing, which makes it surprising that they'd allow an article showing what a lying pig Ryan is, to be published.

 

[Full-Auto]

Any of you punk cowards want to deal with the op-ed opinion?

The punk cowards are on the left, coward.

So instead of refuting the opinion piece that FOX editors decided to publish, you're going to crawl under your rock and pretend that they didn't make that choice.

Idiot and I say that in the most personal way...........


Its an opinion...

 

[DiamondDave]

You really are one lying little pissant. Of course FOX published it, and their editors decide what to publish. Being stupid is one thing, but when you combine it with your propensity to be a cowardly liar, you really make yourself look like dog shit.

So, when a website publishes something, they automatically agree with it? Support it's conclusions?

My God, the depth of your stupidity grows exponentially on a daily basis.

If a media outlet strongly disagrees with an opinion piece, the editors don't publish it. You really ought to think about getting therapy for your terminal stupidity.

BULLSHIT

You ever see opinion disclaimers?? It is COMMONPLACE to have opposing viewpoints in your OPINION column or commentary

You are indeed an idiot... fucking waste of oxygen

 

[WillowTree]

Describing it in these three words, Dazzling, Deceiving & Distracting.

Paul Ryan

I mean, WoW...just WOW!!!

Kudos to THEFOX.

fucking liar. but don't ever say Fox doesn't give lunatic liberals a say.

 

[Conservative]

A Matter of Motivated 'Reasoning' - Room for Debate - NYTimes.com

you have never been one to recognise facts Annie

that is why your party is dying.

You lying little herpes scab. The Democrats have been growing, while the GOP has been shrinking.

Here what is happening in Florida...
Number of newly registered Republicans far outpace Democrats | StAugustine.com

Since a new set of state voting laws went into effect more than a year ago, the number of new Democrats registering in Florida has all but disappeared, according to a Times-Union review.

During the 13 months beginning July 1 the year before elections in 2004 and 2008, registered Democrats increased by an average of 209,425 voters. From 2011 to this year, that number was 11,365. In Duval County alone, there were about 13,000 new Democrats, meaning the rest of the state lost them.

Over that same time, the number of registered Republicans increased by 128,039, topping the average of 103,555 during the past two presidential cycles.

refute that, Dickless.

 

[WillowTree]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

Only a stupid lib would believe the lying op. Foxnews did no such thing. Idiots.

2. Deceiving

On the other hand, to anyone paying the slightest bit of attention to facts, Ryan’s speech was an apparent attempt to set the world record for the greatest number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech. On this measure, while it was Romney who ran the Olympics, Ryan earned the gold.


Read more: Paul Ryan

Under FOX News logo...folks

That's why they're the only news organization who earns the "fair and balanced" .. I'm glad you guys have finally owned up to being liars.

 

[Dot Com]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

That is why Obumble will lose.


Zero cred...........

Sounds like you need two tissues. One to dry your eyes, and one to clean off your hand.

ROFLMAO

 

[healthmyths]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

Who's creditbility[sp]?

If you distrust Fox News All the time which is the narrative that Obamatrons chant
they WHY would you think this is a post has "credibility"?

Just because the contributor (not employee by the way) knocks Ryan's speech makes
Fox News credible now?

You can't have it both ways.

Either Fox News is MORE unbiased then all other MSM or they are not credible which means THIS piece is NOT credible!

By the way it is very simple in writing in the box provided to question spelling i.e.
"creditbility " has a red dotted underline (creditbility) at least on my screen whenever a word is incorrectly spelled. What is your problem with at least advancing some "credibility" in your comments by spelling the few words you offered correctly???

I do distrust FOX, and they are extremely biased to the right. That's precisely why this is significant. If even the scumbags at FOX are publishing stories about what a liar Ryan is, the rest of the media will crucify this filth.

Besides, one way to get through to the ignorance of the right is to use a right wing source. Most of the lazy wingnuts here like to play the illogical game of "shoot the messenger".

Now get back to playing spelling Nazi.

SO YOU believe FOX in this case but most of the time YOU don't trust them?
What was different in this case?

More importantly being a sloppy contributor for a simple word like credibility makes smarter people question the writer's intelligence and therefore the comment's value.
I mean it is NOT an uncommon word like "eleemosynary" which would be excusable except again using the TOOLS available it is questioned by little red dotted line "elleemosynary" indicating it is incorrectly spelled.

So if YOU have problems using simple tools like those provided how can anyone believe that you know what is a LIE and not a LIE ?

 

[Eaglewings]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

Only a stupid lib would believe the lying op. Foxnews did no such thing. Idiots.

Yo, moron. They published it.

The bottom line is Ryan lied through his teeth, and every media outlet, including FOX, is calling him on it.

These blinded double standard morons will of coarse tell you how MSNBC is supporting the Ryan for President ticket because they are airing the nauseating convention, or the have to take a pill Romney is human documentary.
They refuse to think that their beloved Fox news would have any side except theirs.
Total dysfunction as their party leaders are....

 

[bobcollum]

This op is confused, it was an op-ed written by a progressive.

Because we all know very well FOX News would never attempt chiding the Republican VP nominee.

 

[Jackson]

Prime time Viewship (000's)

*Fox News Channel..............5,166
CNN..................................1,201
MSNBC..............................1,317

*Always the same leader

Because it is Fair and Balanced...

 

[IHBF]

The OP is distracting and deceiving.

P.S. the economy sucks. You lose.

 

[007]

Describing it in these three words, Dazzling, Deceiving & Distracting.

Paul Ryan

I mean, WoW...just WOW!!!

Kudos to THEFOX.

 

[Dot Com]

Fox?

 

[bobcollum]

Prime time Viewship (000's)

*Fox News Channel..............5,166
CNN..................................1,201
MSNBC..............................1,317

*Always the same leader

Because it is Fair and Balanced...

Are those more ratings for the RNC?

It's funny some here are surprised by those numbers.

 

[Dot Com]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

Only a stupid lib would believe the lying op. Foxnews did no such thing. Idiots.

Yo, moron. They published it.

The bottom line is Ryan lied through his teeth, and every media outlet, including FOX, is calling him on it.

Fox knew, as did every other news outlet, that Lyin' Ryan's claims were going to be checked and found to be.... well..... lies

 

[Rinata]

Describing it in these three words, Dazzling, Deceiving & Distracting.

Paul Ryan

I mean, WoW...just WOW!!!

Kudos to THEFOX.

You're a lying sack of shit, you know that? FOX NEWS did not say anything like that. Sally Kohn was asked by FOX NEWS to write the liberal response to Ryan's speech...

Sally Kohn

Fox News asked me to write the liberal response to Paul Ryan’s GOP convention speech last night. So I did. I described it in three words: Dazzling, Deceiving and Distracting.

It really doesn't bother you to be such a fucking liar, does it.

You have to forgive them.

They are not aware that there are still fair and balanced news sources which actually present opinion from people of all different perspectives.


LOL

Everybody knows that. However, Fox News is not one of them.

 

[Lovebears65]

Describing it in these three words, Dazzling, Deceiving & Distracting.

Paul Ryan

I mean, WoW...just WOW!!!

Kudos to THEFOX.

You're a lying sack of shit, you know that? FOX NEWS did not say anything like that. Sally Kohn was asked by FOX NEWS to write the liberal response to Ryan's speech...

Sally Kohn

Fox News asked me to write the liberal response to Paul Ryan’s GOP convention speech last night. So I did. I described it in three words: Dazzling, Deceiving and Distracting.

It really doesn't bother you to be such a fucking liar, does it.

The left and their spin

 

[MarcATL]

Wow, when FOX joins in and points out what liars the Romney team is, you know there's going to be a meme by October. It's tough to get back credibility.

Tuck, You don't know very much about Fox. This isn't a big deal at all. They had two opposing views as they usually do. One was from the Fox news contributer and writer, Sally Kohn which elates you so very much and the opposing view was from Matt Kibbe, also a writer for Fox:

Ryan’s speech builds trust among grassroots conservatives
Ryan

Knowing full well you won't bother to read it, I put it here for others to read and comprehend. lol.

It was an easy mistake for you to make, so don't feel badly. The network you are used to watch I'm assuming never puts both sides of an issue out there for viewers to learn and decide for themselves.

Now, do you understand?

So why are so many USMB hardRWers having such a meltdown for posting an article calling Paul Ryan a bonafide liar?

Like this one...

Hi, you have received -422 reputation points from DiamondDave.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
misleading

Regards,
DiamondDave

Note: This is an automated message.

Well? Isn't it time for radical lefties to admit that Fox is fair and balanced? Funny thing about the left, they tend to confuse editorials with news if they hear what they like. The author of the article, Sally Kohn, is a radical left wing lesbian activist.

Describing it in these three words, Dazzling, Deceiving & Distracting.

Paul Ryan

I mean, WoW...just WOW!!!

Kudos to THEFOX.

fucking liar. but don't ever say Fox doesn't give lunatic liberals a say.

What am I lying about exactly?