Would You Support...

[Vastator]

A new policy mandating that United States Supreme Court Justices, and nominees; be assigned Secret Service Security details?

 

[eagle1462010]

Of course..............we live in a dangerous political environment ..........and they can be targets.......

 

[night_son]

A new policy mandating that United States Supreme Court Justices, and nominees; be assigned Secret Service Security details?

Absolutely. Praetorian swords and spears for all nominees, regardless of the personal political islands they've chosen to castaway on.

 

[Vastator]

It’s just probably better to get out in front of any threat. Rather than reacting to one.

 

[caddo kid]

It’s just probably better to get out in front of any threat. Rather than reacting to one.

That is actually not a very conservative way of looking at the issue, IMO

 

[rightwinger]

A new policy mandating that United States Supreme Court Justices, and nominees; be assigned Secret Service Security details?

Not needed

No Justice has ever been attacked

 

[BellaRose]

Not when our taxes pay for it .

 

[BluesLegend]

A new policy mandating that United States Supreme Court Justices, and nominees; be assigned Secret Service Security details?

Not needed

No Justice has ever been attacked

Dem's are triggering the left wing nut jobs, it would not surprise me if one went after a SC justice.

 

[Vastator]

A new policy mandating that United States Supreme Court Justices, and nominees; be assigned Secret Service Security details?

Not needed

No Justice has ever been attacked

Dem's are triggering the left wing nut jobs, it would not surprise me if one went after a SC justice.

Additionally it comes as no surprise that leftists recoil from the idea. I guess they like keeping their options open...