Would You Correc The Gay Gene???

[GHook93]

I support gay rights and I fully support gay marriage, but I do have a question for gay right advocates. The argument is always that gays don't choose it, it chooses them. Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way. No saying it's a disease, but scientist are working with DNA to cure genetic diseases.

So the question is, if we could "cure" the gay strain in the DNA would you do it?

 

[Zander]

Isn't AIDS the cure?

 

[Pop23]

I support gay rights and I fully support gay marriage, but I do have a question for gay right advocates. The argument is always that gays don't choose it, it chooses them. Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way. No saying it's a disease, but scientist are working with DNA to cure genetic diseases.

So the question is, if we could "cure" the gay strain in the DNA would you do it?

Wouldn't that actually be considered the humane thing to do?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I support gay rights and I fully support gay marriage, but I do have a question for gay right advocates. The argument is always that gays don't choose it, it chooses them. Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way. No saying it's a disease, but scientist are working with DNA to cure genetic diseases.

So the question is, if we could "cure" the gay strain in the DNA would you do it?

No. Nothing wrong with a little variety, and interior decorating.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Meh leave it up to the individual

 

[SwimExpert]

Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way.

This is a false premise.

 

[Pop23]

Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way.

This is a false premise.

Only if you eliminate the premise which includes the word "if".

It is a legitimate question.

I look at it this way

My unborn child is tested and the Doctor tells me it will be born gay but there is a treatment that can reverse it, what do you do?

OP, was that your intent?

 

[SwimExpert]

Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way.

This is a false premise.

Only if you eliminate the premise which includes the word "if".

There is no "if" in the premise.

 

[Zander]

If you

Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way.

This is a false premise.

Only if you eliminate the premise which includes the word "if".

It is a legitimate question.

I look at it this way

My unborn child is tested and the Doctor tells me it will be born gay but there is a treatment that can reverse it, what do you do?

OP, was that your intent?

But, who wouldn't want an absolutely fabulous gay baby??

 

[TheOldSchool]

Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way.

This is a false premise.

Only if you eliminate the premise which includes the word "if".

It is a legitimate question.

I look at it this way

My unborn child is tested and the Doctor tells me it will be born gay but there is a treatment that can reverse it, what do you do?

OP, was that your intent?

I'd reverse it because that way I'm saving him/her from the torment of millions of bastards who'd like to drive them towards suicide.

 

[Zander]

Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way.

This is a false premise.

Only if you eliminate the premise which includes the word "if".

It is a legitimate question.

I look at it this way

My unborn child is tested and the Doctor tells me it will be born gay but there is a treatment that can reverse it, what do you do?

OP, was that your intent?

I'd reverse it because that way I'm saving him/her from the torment of millions of bastards who'd like to drive them towards suicide.

I'd take whatever I got and love him or her unconditionally.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

What makes you think it's defective? Nature is funny that way.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

The gene's of birth?????

I guess I didn't read the OP closely enough. In that case gramps refer to my other post where I'd reverse the gene to protect the child from assholes and bastards who want to viciously torment them for being "defective."

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

The gene's of birth?????

I guess I didn't read the OP closely enough. In that case gramps refer to my other post where I'd reverse the gene to protect the child from assholes and bastards who want to viciously torment them for being "defective."

The fag gene is no different than the diabetic gene or cancer gene. Eliminate them all if given the chance.

 

[bripat9643]

I support gay rights and I fully support gay marriage, but I do have a question for gay right advocates. The argument is always that gays don't choose it, it chooses them. Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way. No saying it's a disease, but scientist are working with DNA to cure genetic diseases.

So the question is, if we could "cure" the gay strain in the DNA would you do it?

No. Nothing wrong with a little variety, and interior decorating.

Would you allow a child of your own to be gay if you could prevent it? I think not. I can't imagine any parent would.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I support gay rights and I fully support gay marriage, but I do have a question for gay right advocates. The argument is always that gays don't choose it, it chooses them. Meaning it's in there genes and it wires them that way. No saying it's a disease, but scientist are working with DNA to cure genetic diseases.

So the question is, if we could "cure" the gay strain in the DNA would you do it?

No. Nothing wrong with a little variety, and interior decorating.

Would you allow a child of your own to be gay if you could prevent it? I think not. I can't imagine any parent would.

Not a problem. I like gay kids. Just like other kids, but better dressed.

 

[bripat9643]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

The gene's of birth?????

I guess I didn't read the OP closely enough. In that case gramps refer to my other post where I'd reverse the gene to protect the child from assholes and bastards who want to viciously torment them for being "defective."

That's right, blame everyone else for your decisions.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

The gene's of birth?????

I guess I didn't read the OP closely enough. In that case gramps refer to my other post where I'd reverse the gene to protect the child from assholes and bastards who want to viciously torment them for being "defective."

The fag gene is no different than the diabetic gene or cancer gene. Eliminate them all if given the chance.

I don't think I'd like to have a beer with you anymore gramps.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

The gene's of birth?????

I guess I didn't read the OP closely enough. In that case gramps refer to my other post where I'd reverse the gene to protect the child from assholes and bastards who want to viciously torment them for being "defective."

That's right, blame everyone else for your decisions.

Care to clarify? Because you made zero sense there.

 

[SwimExpert]

Meh leave it up to the individual

That's patently stupid. If it's in the genes from birth who's going to ask the infant what their choice is. Then who's going to decipher the cries to determine their answer?

Just eliminate the defective gene for Christ's sake

The gene's of birth?????

I guess I didn't read the OP closely enough. In that case gramps refer to my other post where I'd reverse the gene to protect the child from assholes and bastards who want to viciously torment them for being "defective."

The fag gene is no different than the diabetic gene or cancer gene. Eliminate them all if given the chance.

First, let's eliminate your piece-of-shit gene.