CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Banned
- #161
where does it say they reject the Commission Report? they are saying there are 250 questions left unanswered. that is in no way a rejection.
you fucking liar.
I've only posted it about ten times.
"Q: Will the new Commission have a bias or pre-determined conclusion about the events of September 11?
The investigation will commence from a starting point of zero assumption or bias about the events of September 11. The investigation will be fact-driven and will use only the most rigorous legal standards for establishing the truth about those tragic events."
NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
That's a rejection of the CR. They are point blank saying the starting point is from "zero assumptions." They probably can't agree on what is or is not reliable from the CR thus they want a full NEW investigation. If they accepted the CR they would start their investigation by saying "A, B, and C" from the CR tells us "X." They are obviously not using the CR in their new investigation, which is obviously a rejection.
That's a rejection of the CR.
Absolutely wrong. It is a contention that if there is this new "commission," it will be completely unbiased. It is not at all the same thing as claiming that the actual commission was biased in any way. That's not even a remotely reasonable inference that can be validly drawn from the excerpt bent tight quoted.
Bent tight remains a fucking imbecile.
By the way, even if this NY Can Can crap is claiming that the prior commission was biased, that hardly makes it so.
Wow. You truly are dumb. The Commission wasn't biased? Yep. Bush admin creating the Commission is perfectly innocent. What a fucking colossal idiot!