Do you think Bush and company were so morally corrupt as to commit such a heinous act?
Do cheney, rumsfeld, and a few others have the capacity to be so morally corrupt to lie and murder thousands of people to further their goals? We have indisputable empirical evidence that is true with Iraq. Why ask such a silly question that has already been answered. As for Bush personally, no I don't think he is capable of playing a role other than repeating what he is told and doing as he is told. We see the evidence of that on 9E itself when Cheney took control which was unConstitutional while the President was available to fulfill his duties. Bush sat down and shut up on that day just like when the 9EC (Commission) was told the only way it could ask bush questions is if cheney was there, they could review everything it had covered so far, and no recording nor transcript would be allowed. The more honest question would be: Is there any evidence the Bush admin had any morality on any level higher than NAMBLA?
Overall the question is based in a false dilemma. One does not need to believe the whole thing was an inside job to demand a new investigation.
"Silly Question"? You're supporting the view that Bush is behind the 9/11 attacks and you're admonishing me for asking a "silly question"? That's priceless.
In any event, yea, ok, the onus is on you to prove it. Until then you're just another loon.
Usually when people such as Curve are that wrong, they try to eventually change the subject. Amazingly, he just keeps on embarrassing himself. He should do something about that.