Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
With all those anti black posts as well.Uhuh, right, all those "white supremacist" posts I make all the time. I forgot about those.Based on your more than 6,000 white supremacist fascist hate the black posts, son, I bet I am right.Oh, here we go. The innevitable "you're racist" card has been pulled.Your racism is the cop out. Listen to the CoP, not your inner racist.Cop out.Godboy, you never talk reasonably. You come from a confirmation bias perspective. In other words, you know what you know, so don't bother you with the evidence.
The chief of police and others officers disagree with you. Talk to them.
The cop was wrong, and you haters will just have to get it over it.
Racism is what this is all about, not the arrest. He told the truth about black people causing more trouble for the cops and his crime is being white while saying it. Now he's in dutch.Your racism is the cop out. Listen to the CoP, not your inner racist.Cop out.Godboy, you never talk reasonably. You come from a confirmation bias perspective. In other words, you know what you know, so don't bother you with the evidence.
The chief of police and others officers disagree with you. Talk to them.
You're a full blown idiot.Frivolous lawsuits are thrown out.
Not with the current climate, too many Blacks encounters with the police are being used to promote an agenda...
What you fail to admit is were are the White and Hispanic videos with outrage...
When you resist law enforcement there are usually consequences no matter what color your skin is, but you would have to have common sense to admit that...
This wasn't frivolous - and screwball, if a lawsuit is likely, the last fucking thing you do is admit fault.
It will end up with a settlement and yes to curb the cost management will take the apologetic road...
Didn't think that through, did you?
You don't have any common sense do you? That's okay, I'll point it out for you...
Yeah everyone who is accountable in our world is a idiot according to your opinion...
The video below is a great example of the world according to liberals...
Are you the kid or the adult?
You act like the kid...
No excuse for what??? What did you see her do?So what's the answer here? The officer told her to get back in her car 5 times and she refused. Clearly the black woman was wrong. It seems excessive what the office did but she has to obey his instructions. However, the conversation in the car was clearly wrong. He needs to be suspended or fired just for that alone.
A teacher has no excuse. PERIOD
These fuckers instigate confrontations. Fuck them. They're fucking worthless.parasites.Whether she was or not, within one short second, the officer is shouting "Stop resisting." How can he objectionally determine that so quickly?
It's not just he's planning to say that no matter what, but that he is framing her with a serious crime which can be a felony.
2:16 - grabs her
2:17 - yells "Stop"
2:18 - yells "Stop resisting"
3 seconds in the scheme of things is nothing. At least give a warning that an arrest will occur if she doesn't put her feet in an close the door. Both the cop's and the woman's life would have been a whole lot easier. Also, you act as is she was totally noncomplient. She did go back and get in the car, and that alone should buy her another warning about getting her feet in the car and closing the door, EXPLAINING THE CONSEQUENCES IF SHE DOESN'T.Even the most rabid cop hater on this thread admitted she had at least 3 seconds to comply. Drawing upon your expertise on police procedure, how long was the cop supposed to wait before concluding she had no intention of complying?Had the cop told her one more time to fully comply with his orders or he would arrest her and take her in, giving her a moment to comply, I would be fine with what he did if she still didn't comply. There was no warning that he was about to get physical with her by pulling her out of the car. And she was in the car because she had obeyed that previous order.Funny how cops don't see what he did wrong. I'm sure they ignore the cop haters but I wonder how they keep a straight face when they hear the police chief prattling on about how this cop was so abusive. It's no wonder real cops don't consider police chiefs to be cops.She did get back in the car.So what's the answer here? The officer told her to get back in her car 5 times and she refused. Clearly the black woman was wrong. It seems excessive what the office did but she has to obey his instructions. What should the officer do when she's clearly lying about stopping and them refusing to get back in her car?
She pulled into the store parking lot before the cop got right behind her car to pull her over. She got out of the car as if to go into the store when the cop told her to get back into the car because was pulling her over. She was acting as if she didn't realize she was being pulled over, and the cop ordered her back into the car. She got back into her car, sticking to the story that she did not realize that she was being pulled over. The cop didn't beleive her because she did not have her wallet with her and told her.
At this point the cop may have been correct that the lady had seen him coming and pulled into the store parking lot to avoid getting a ticket. However, there is no way of proving that. Sometimes people do go into stores forgetting to carry a wallet.
The problem for the cop was that the lady did go back to the car and only needed to put her feet in and close the door. Had he given her another two seconds she probably would had complied with that because she was finished with her story that she didn't realize that she was being pulled over. The situation was coming under control with the lady beginning to comply when the cop decided to physically restrain the lady and arrest her. The cop did not have to escalate the situation.
I don't want to beleive that any of the cops, or former cops that have been replying to this thread would have pulled the lady out of the car at the point this cop did.
She didn't get back into the car. She kept her legs in the way. Police have these procedures for their own safety and they follow them meticulously because they are tried and proven. When someone doesn't cooperate, they compromise the officer's safety. Then she resisted arrest, something that elevates the risk both to the suspect and the officer and often gets someone killed. At every step, this woman had a choice, and at every step she chose a course of noncompliance. I feel zero pity for her.3 seconds in the scheme of things is nothing. At least give a warning that an arrest will occur if she doesn't put her feet in an close the door. Both the cop's and the woman's life would have been a whole lot easier. Also, you act as is she was totally noncomplient. She did go back and get in the car, and that alone should buy her another warning about getting her feet in the car and closing the door, EXPLAINING THE CONSEQUENCES IF SHE DOESN'T.Even the most rabid cop hater on this thread admitted she had at least 3 seconds to comply. Drawing upon your expertise on police procedure, how long was the cop supposed to wait before concluding she had no intention of complying?Had the cop told her one more time to fully comply with his orders or he would arrest her and take her in, giving her a moment to comply, I would be fine with what he did if she still didn't comply. There was no warning that he was about to get physical with her by pulling her out of the car. And she was in the car because she had obeyed that previous order.Funny how cops don't see what he did wrong. I'm sure they ignore the cop haters but I wonder how they keep a straight face when they hear the police chief prattling on about how this cop was so abusive. It's no wonder real cops don't consider police chiefs to be cops.She did get back in the car.So what's the answer here? The officer told her to get back in her car 5 times and she refused. Clearly the black woman was wrong. It seems excessive what the office did but she has to obey his instructions. What should the officer do when she's clearly lying about stopping and them refusing to get back in her car?
She pulled into the store parking lot before the cop got right behind her car to pull her over. She got out of the car as if to go into the store when the cop told her to get back into the car because was pulling her over. She was acting as if she didn't realize she was being pulled over, and the cop ordered her back into the car. She got back into her car, sticking to the story that she did not realize that she was being pulled over. The cop didn't beleive her because she did not have her wallet with her and told her.
At this point the cop may have been correct that the lady had seen him coming and pulled into the store parking lot to avoid getting a ticket. However, there is no way of proving that. Sometimes people do go into stores forgetting to carry a wallet.
The problem for the cop was that the lady did go back to the car and only needed to put her feet in and close the door. Had he given her another two seconds she probably would had complied with that because she was finished with her story that she didn't realize that she was being pulled over. The situation was coming under control with the lady beginning to comply when the cop decided to physically restrain the lady and arrest her. The cop did not have to escalate the situation.
I don't want to beleive that any of the cops, or former cops that have been replying to this thread would have pulled the lady out of the car at the point this cop did.
The burden of being professional is on the cop, not the speeder.
All I can say is be prepared for lawsuits.She didn't get back into the car. She kept her legs in the way. Police have these procedures for their own safety and they follow them meticulously because they are tried and proven. When someone doesn't cooperate, they compromise the officer's safety. Then she resisted arrest, something that elevates the risk both to the suspect and the officer and often gets someone killed. At every step, this woman had a choice, and at every step she chose a course of noncompliance. I feel zero pity for her.3 seconds in the scheme of things is nothing. At least give a warning that an arrest will occur if she doesn't put her feet in an close the door. Both the cop's and the woman's life would have been a whole lot easier. Also, you act as is she was totally noncomplient. She did go back and get in the car, and that alone should buy her another warning about getting her feet in the car and closing the door, EXPLAINING THE CONSEQUENCES IF SHE DOESN'T.Even the most rabid cop hater on this thread admitted she had at least 3 seconds to comply. Drawing upon your expertise on police procedure, how long was the cop supposed to wait before concluding she had no intention of complying?Had the cop told her one more time to fully comply with his orders or he would arrest her and take her in, giving her a moment to comply, I would be fine with what he did if she still didn't comply. There was no warning that he was about to get physical with her by pulling her out of the car. And she was in the car because she had obeyed that previous order.Funny how cops don't see what he did wrong. I'm sure they ignore the cop haters but I wonder how they keep a straight face when they hear the police chief prattling on about how this cop was so abusive. It's no wonder real cops don't consider police chiefs to be cops.She did get back in the car.
She pulled into the store parking lot before the cop got right behind her car to pull her over. She got out of the car as if to go into the store when the cop told her to get back into the car because was pulling her over. She was acting as if she didn't realize she was being pulled over, and the cop ordered her back into the car. She got back into her car, sticking to the story that she did not realize that she was being pulled over. The cop didn't beleive her because she did not have her wallet with her and told her.
At this point the cop may have been correct that the lady had seen him coming and pulled into the store parking lot to avoid getting a ticket. However, there is no way of proving that. Sometimes people do go into stores forgetting to carry a wallet.
The problem for the cop was that the lady did go back to the car and only needed to put her feet in and close the door. Had he given her another two seconds she probably would had complied with that because she was finished with her story that she didn't realize that she was being pulled over. The situation was coming under control with the lady beginning to comply when the cop decided to physically restrain the lady and arrest her. The cop did not have to escalate the situation.
I don't want to beleive that any of the cops, or former cops that have been replying to this thread would have pulled the lady out of the car at the point this cop did.
The burden of being professional is on the cop, not the speeder.
Had the cop told her one more time to fully comply with his orders or he would arrest her and take her in, giving her a moment to comply, I would be fine with what he did if she still didn't comply. There was no warning that he was about to get physical with her by pulling her out of the car. And she was in the car because she had obeyed that previous order.
Now that all your arguments have failed you.All I can say is be prepared for lawsuits.She didn't get back into the car. She kept her legs in the way. Police have these procedures for their own safety and they follow them meticulously because they are tried and proven. When someone doesn't cooperate, they compromise the officer's safety. Then she resisted arrest, something that elevates the risk both to the suspect and the officer and often gets someone killed. At every step, this woman had a choice, and at every step she chose a course of noncompliance. I feel zero pity for her.3 seconds in the scheme of things is nothing. At least give a warning that an arrest will occur if she doesn't put her feet in an close the door. Both the cop's and the woman's life would have been a whole lot easier. Also, you act as is she was totally noncomplient. She did go back and get in the car, and that alone should buy her another warning about getting her feet in the car and closing the door, EXPLAINING THE CONSEQUENCES IF SHE DOESN'T.Even the most rabid cop hater on this thread admitted she had at least 3 seconds to comply. Drawing upon your expertise on police procedure, how long was the cop supposed to wait before concluding she had no intention of complying?Had the cop told her one more time to fully comply with his orders or he would arrest her and take her in, giving her a moment to comply, I would be fine with what he did if she still didn't comply. There was no warning that he was about to get physical with her by pulling her out of the car. And she was in the car because she had obeyed that previous order.Funny how cops don't see what he did wrong. I'm sure they ignore the cop haters but I wonder how they keep a straight face when they hear the police chief prattling on about how this cop was so abusive. It's no wonder real cops don't consider police chiefs to be cops.
The burden of being professional is on the cop, not the speeder.
My arguments have not failed. We simply do not agree. On an anonymous message board -- so what! Let's see if the lady involved wins a civil suit or gets a substantial out of court settlement.Now that all your arguments have failed you.All I can say is be prepared for lawsuits.She didn't get back into the car. She kept her legs in the way. Police have these procedures for their own safety and they follow them meticulously because they are tried and proven. When someone doesn't cooperate, they compromise the officer's safety. Then she resisted arrest, something that elevates the risk both to the suspect and the officer and often gets someone killed. At every step, this woman had a choice, and at every step she chose a course of noncompliance. I feel zero pity for her.3 seconds in the scheme of things is nothing. At least give a warning that an arrest will occur if she doesn't put her feet in an close the door. Both the cop's and the woman's life would have been a whole lot easier. Also, you act as is she was totally noncomplient. She did go back and get in the car, and that alone should buy her another warning about getting her feet in the car and closing the door, EXPLAINING THE CONSEQUENCES IF SHE DOESN'T.Even the most rabid cop hater on this thread admitted she had at least 3 seconds to comply. Drawing upon your expertise on police procedure, how long was the cop supposed to wait before concluding she had no intention of complying?Had the cop told her one more time to fully comply with his orders or he would arrest her and take her in, giving her a moment to comply, I would be fine with what he did if she still didn't comply. There was no warning that he was about to get physical with her by pulling her out of the car. And she was in the car because she had obeyed that previous order.
The burden of being professional is on the cop, not the speeder.
She'll win the negro lottery, but it has nothing to do with whether or not the officer did the right thing.My arguments have not failed. We simply do not agree. On an anonymous message board -- so what! Let's see if the lady involved wins a civil suit or gets a substantial out of court settlement.Now that all your arguments have failed you.All I can say is be prepared for lawsuits.She didn't get back into the car. She kept her legs in the way. Police have these procedures for their own safety and they follow them meticulously because they are tried and proven. When someone doesn't cooperate, they compromise the officer's safety. Then she resisted arrest, something that elevates the risk both to the suspect and the officer and often gets someone killed. At every step, this woman had a choice, and at every step she chose a course of noncompliance. I feel zero pity for her.3 seconds in the scheme of things is nothing. At least give a warning that an arrest will occur if she doesn't put her feet in an close the door. Both the cop's and the woman's life would have been a whole lot easier. Also, you act as is she was totally noncomplient. She did go back and get in the car, and that alone should buy her another warning about getting her feet in the car and closing the door, EXPLAINING THE CONSEQUENCES IF SHE DOESN'T.Even the most rabid cop hater on this thread admitted she had at least 3 seconds to comply. Drawing upon your expertise on police procedure, how long was the cop supposed to wait before concluding she had no intention of complying?
The burden of being professional is on the cop, not the speeder.
No sir she did what she wanted n for that she got what was needed, a little attitude adjustment. I've been arrested 7 times, resisted once, when i acted a fool I was tackled by three officers. Just do what the damn police ask when stopped n 99% of the time things will go a lot smoother for all parties.And she did get in her car.She was asked five times to get in the car, cop did his job.
This cop is typical of those who provoke police assassinations but the sad thing is the cops who are killed are likely to be least deserving of such retaliation.I saw the whole thing. The woman was no threat to the police officer he who handled it wrongfully and unlawfully.
The APD already apologized, the guys is on restricted duties, the DA is looking at pressing criminal charges, and the first offer was $500K to her not to sue.
That woman complied with the cop's demand to produce her driver license and to get back in her car. When she failed to instantly comply with his command to close the car door he reacted in the same manner as the trooper in the Sandra Bland incident -- but with even more unreasonable and unnecessarily brutal force.Look again. The police chief said he did something wrong. Tell us what it was he did.
This kind of bullshit excuse-fabrication is precisely the kind of smart-ass nonsense that provokes police assassinations. That cop behaved like a Cossack during Czarist Russia. But he's not a Cossack and this isn't Czarist Russia -- as he is soon to learn.Damn she just kept fighting eve after she was in handcuffs, dumbass tried just walking into the Wendy's knowing a cop has pulled her over and that shit puts cops on edge and seriously he asked her to close her door it's for his safety and she refused so he tells her to get out.
She did follow his instructions right up to the point where it seemed excessive. She'd done nothing but exceed the speed limit. She'd harmed no one and that cop should realize people are not always going to respond to him the way Marine recruits respond to a DI.All she had to do was follow instructions.
