Witness Calls Jamie Raskin A Liar To His Face.....Chaos Ensues

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Foxfyre]

She asks him a question......and when he begins to answer the question she cuts him off and reclaims her time.

Never ask a question you don't know the answer to, and never ask a question when you know the answer destroys your case.

Clearly this woman isn't a lawyer.

Well she's right. RICO is not a crime but a category of crime. However Bobulinski unequivocally said yes when AOC asked him if he had witnessed Joe Biden commit a crime. And she would not let him specify the crime. He is not a lawyer so would need to explain what the crime was that he was specifying but he probably could not put the exact legal terminology to it.

By contrast when Schiff paraded out his cadre of witnesses to accuse Donald Trump of crimes and the Republicans asked each one if they specifically heard or witnessed Trump doing or saying or suggesting anything inappropriate or illegal, each one said unequivocally "no".

And Les Parnas is facing 20 months prison courtesy of the Biden administration who took him out when he was still Giuliani's associate. Anybody want to follow the money and whatever he was promised to testify the way he did?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Raskin gives snake shxt a bad reputation.

 

[mudwhistle]

Well she's right. RICO is not a crime but a category of crime. However Bobulinski unequivocally said yes when AOC asked him if he had witnessed Joe Biden commit a crime. And she would not let him specify the crime. He is not a lawyer so would need to explain what the crime was that he was specifying but he probably could not put the exact legal terminology to it.

By contrast when Schiff paraded out his cadre of witnesses to accuse Donald Trump of crimes and the Republicans asked each one if they specifically heard or witnessed Trump doing or saying or suggesting anything inappropriate or illegal, each one said unequivocally "no".

The problem is the Bidens are guilty of hundreds of crimes....many of which fall under RICO.

They all have only 5 mins.....so she knows he wouldn't have the time to lay out the case against Biden.

Most of it falls under 18 U.S.C. 61. He was about to answer that and she cut him off because she didn't want to hear a valid answer to her question.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[1srelluc]

I usually don't root for cancer but in Raskin's case I'll make a exception....Go cancer.

Just behind Schiff he is lower than pond scum.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Unkotare]

Retweet is not a post.

 

[Harry Dresden]

You still haven't realized yet these impeachment hearings are embarrassing failures, and Republicans look like the weak feckless morons they are?

Joe and Kamala are laughing their asses off at you every day.

You're a laughing stock. Have some self respect man.

you get laughed at quite often yourself skewy......how are you any different?...

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[otto105]

This is priceless.

They need to do this more often.

Jamie Raskin is a bold-faced liar and everyone knows it.

 

[the other mike]

This is priceless.

They need to do this more often.

Jamie Raskin is a bold-faced liar and everyone knows it.

What's kind of remarkable is that as bad as Raskin is , he is almost likeable compared to Goldman .