Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I know preachers need to also make a good living but at our local denominational church when youth see the pastor getting paid $140K a year with a house provided and 4 weeks vacation a year, 2 million dollar mortgage on the new church and $240,000 spent on stained glass windows it sort of turns them off of Pay to Pray.
So you're saying that roos don't come from Oz. So how did they get there from the ark? Pacific ocean and all.Says the P(i)MP who couldn't answer the question.well that works.....if you can't answer the question you can always fall back on your stupidity.....So how did Noah get kangaroos from Australia and back again?
so what?
your question falsely assumes kangaroos were in Australia to begin with.
it's also completely irrelevant to the veracity of the bible. It's quite easy for early inhabitants to transport animals to a variety of places. As there is no specifics in the scriptures it's just pure speculation.
you are trying to use an argument from silence to prove your case. Any logic 101 class would show you why that thinking is flawed.
a real question you should ask is why does the concept of the global flood show up in cultures from all around the world?
the Greeks may be explainable. They are near the middle east, but why do native Americans have flood myths?
M. D., we have been through this before and then you ran away for a long time.
Biblical literalism is heresy (error), and if pursued anxiously leads to apostasy.
Modern day Pharisee-ism of the evangelicals, fundamentalists, and Pentecostals has created a closed world of "believers" obsessed about outward dogma and religious exercises that substitutes for placing one's salvation in the absolute confidence of God and His revelation to each one of us alone: it's between Him and me. The Bible will save no one.
The Bible will save no one? Wow, that's a pretty strong statement, the only one I've ever seen you make on this board. At least you've finally revealed your stance on Christianity. What mainstream Christian denomination believes that the Bible is irrelevant for a Christian? Where else does a Christian learn of Christ and His salvation if not from the Bible? I know you won't answer, but your non answer really is an answer, perhaps you just don't realize that it exposes you and always has? lol
Wherever Noah started from, there had to be plenty of animals that had to come from the other side of the world. Please explain.So you're saying that roos don't come from Oz. So how did they get there from the ark? Pacific ocean and all.Says the P(i)MP who couldn't answer the question.well that works.....if you can't answer the question you can always fall back on your stupidity.....So how did Noah get kangaroos from Australia and back again?
so what?
your question falsely assumes kangaroos were in Australia to begin with.
it's also completely irrelevant to the veracity of the bible. It's quite easy for early inhabitants to transport animals to a variety of places. As there is no specifics in the scriptures it's just pure speculation.
you are trying to use an argument from silence to prove your case. Any logic 101 class would show you why that thinking is flawed.
a real question you should ask is why does the concept of the global flood show up in cultures from all around the world?
the Greeks may be explainable. They are near the middle east, but why do native Americans have flood myths?
no I'm saying you haven't bothered to think out the question and that even if it wasn't ignorant it is irrelevant to the argument you are trying to use it for.
see if you actually thought about it you'd realize we don't know where the ark started from. For all we know Noah could have started in Australia. We don't know.
what we do know is that a global flood was taught as history on different sides of the globe.
M. D., we have been through this before and then you ran away for a long time.
Biblical literalism is heresy (error), and if pursued anxiously leads to apostasy.
Modern day Pharisee-ism of the evangelicals, fundamentalists, and Pentecostals has created a closed world of "believers" obsessed about outward dogma and religious exercises that substitutes for placing one's salvation in the absolute confidence of God and His revelation to each one of us alone: it's between Him and me. The Bible will save no one.
The Bible will save no one? Wow, that's a pretty strong statement, the only one I've ever seen you make on this board. At least you've finally revealed your stance on Christianity. What mainstream Christian denomination believes that the Bible is irrelevant for a Christian? Where else does a Christian learn of Christ and His salvation if not from the Bible? I know you won't answer, but your non answer really is an answer, perhaps you just don't realize that it exposes you and always has? lol
Newby, you are a pretender, a poser when it comes to Christianity.
My salvation comes through the suffering, crucifixion, and triumph of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. I call him 'Lord' and he calls me by my first name. Newby, the Bible will not save you; only Jesus can do that. Your fixation as a modern-day Pharisee leaves you Saul and he held the coats of those who stoned Stephen. You have time left. Use it wisely.
Newby, the condescender, whines when he gets his condescending rhetorical teeth kicked down his throat. Jesus comes as Jesus will, through a book or many books or a witness or many witnesses or a light on the road to Damascus, or whatever. It will not be limited to the inside of a Pharisee fence erected by modern-day Pharisees like Newby.
Newby, and other Christian heretics who preach salvation is impossible without the Bible, forgets that the book was not accepted in its parts for centuries after the death of Christ.
All who listen to the Newbys are in peril of not finding the Jesus Christ who loves them.
That's not true at all. Most societies had flood tales but there's nothing to indicate that they were tales of a global flood. And they certainly weren't connected to the Noah fable.So you're saying that roos don't come from Oz. So how did they get there from the ark? Pacific ocean and all.Says the P(i)MP who couldn't answer the question.well that works.....if you can't answer the question you can always fall back on your stupidity.....So how did Noah get kangaroos from Australia and back again?
so what?
your question falsely assumes kangaroos were in Australia to begin with.
it's also completely irrelevant to the veracity of the bible. It's quite easy for early inhabitants to transport animals to a variety of places. As there is no specifics in the scriptures it's just pure speculation.
you are trying to use an argument from silence to prove your case. Any logic 101 class would show you why that thinking is flawed.
a real question you should ask is why does the concept of the global flood show up in cultures from all around the world?
the Greeks may be explainable. They are near the middle east, but why do native Americans have flood myths?
no I'm saying you haven't bothered to think out the question and that even if it wasn't ignorant it is irrelevant to the argument you are trying to use it for.
see if you actually thought about it you'd realize we don't know where the ark started from. For all we know Noah could have started in Australia. We don't know.
what we do know is that a global flood was taught as history on different sides of the globe.
don't they all date back to the day the last survivor stepped off the boat?......Many of the tales pre-date the biblical fable
Actually, no. As opposed to your belief in a 6,000 year old planet, your Ark tales are a bust.don't they all date back to the day the last survivor stepped off the boat?......Many of the tales pre-date the biblical fable
/yawn.....and yet we both know I have no such belief.....don't you regret wasting our time with that silly post?.......you could have said something worth reading instead.......Actually, no. As opposed to your belief in a 6,000 year old planet, your Ark tales are a bust.don't they all date back to the day the last survivor stepped off the boat?......Many of the tales pre-date the biblical fable
There's no need to retreat from embracing your YEC'ist beliefs. Try to be honest about something, anything./yawn.....and yet we both know I have no such belief.....don't you regret wasting our time with that silly post?.......you could have said something worth reading instead.......Actually, no. As opposed to your belief in a 6,000 year old planet, your Ark tales are a bust.don't they all date back to the day the last survivor stepped off the boat?......Many of the tales pre-date the biblical fable
Hollie, trying to score points with deceit.....fails again......your YEC'ist beliefs.
The YEC'ist, back peddling....... fails........ as usual.........Hollie, trying to score points with deceit.....fails again......your YEC'ist beliefs.