Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
- 2,250
Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
You think Trump will bring back his businesses from overseas?With him in office, the numbers of returning businesses would be much greater.. With Hillary Globalist, they would be staying overseas.Without Trump in office?
IMPOSSIBLE!
Incomes are rising. 2014 - 2016 will show best rise in median incomes since 1997-2000. Besides things have been booming in the NYC, NJ New England areas for quite some time as wellHow long have median household numbers been stagnant?If you go to BLS statistics, you will see 10 million jobs in all areas.
Repeating the RW myth that they were all burger flipper jobs is deceptive don't ya think?
You might have a point if the median household income increased. But as we know, it's been close to stagnant since DumBama took office.
How long have median household numbers been stagnant?
Throughout DumBama's entire term.
You forgot Bush
I applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
Let’s start with a simple measure, the average number of jobs created per year of their presidency (which will allow us to compare one-termers and two-termers). Here’s what it looks like:
So Bill Clinton comes out best, followed by Jimmy Carter (bet you didn’t know that), followed by Reagan and then Obama. Job growth during George H.W. Bush’s presidency was weak, but not as bad as it was for his son, where it was absolutely abysmal.
Yes.You think Trump will bring back his businesses from overseas?With him in office, the numbers of returning businesses would be much greater.. With Hillary Globalist, they would be staying overseas.Without Trump in office?
IMPOSSIBLE!
LinkI applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
Let’s start with a simple measure, the average number of jobs created per year of their presidency (which will allow us to compare one-termers and two-termers). Here’s what it looks like:
So Bill Clinton comes out best, followed by Jimmy Carter (bet you didn’t know that), followed by Reagan and then Obama. Job growth during George H.W. Bush’s presidency was weak, but not as bad as it was for his son, where it was absolutely abysmal.
All hail Obama.
I realize that as an ideologue the truth doesn't make you feel stupid.
The very link YOU just provided.LinkI applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
Let’s start with a simple measure, the average number of jobs created per year of their presidency (which will allow us to compare one-termers and two-termers). Here’s what it looks like:
So Bill Clinton comes out best, followed by Jimmy Carter (bet you didn’t know that), followed by Reagan and then Obama. Job growth during George H.W. Bush’s presidency was weak, but not as bad as it was for his son, where it was absolutely abysmal.
All hail Obama.
I realize that as an ideologue the truth doesn't make you feel stupid.
LinkThe very link YOU just provided.LinkI applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
Let’s start with a simple measure, the average number of jobs created per year of their presidency (which will allow us to compare one-termers and two-termers). Here’s what it looks like:
So Bill Clinton comes out best, followed by Jimmy Carter (bet you didn’t know that), followed by Reagan and then Obama. Job growth during George H.W. Bush’s presidency was weak, but not as bad as it was for his son, where it was absolutely abysmal.
All hail Obama.
I realize that as an ideologue the truth doesn't make you feel stupid.
The article was non-specific BECAUSE it didn't want to state the obvious...the majority of jobs created were LOW-WAGE jobs.
YOU provide an article proving Obama created millions of high paying careers.
But you can't and the article you DID provide PROVED that you can't.
LinkThe very link YOU just provided.LinkI applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.Let us know when you realize just how stupid that post is.
It shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to realize it.
Let’s start with a simple measure, the average number of jobs created per year of their presidency (which will allow us to compare one-termers and two-termers). Here’s what it looks like:
So Bill Clinton comes out best, followed by Jimmy Carter (bet you didn’t know that), followed by Reagan and then Obama. Job growth during George H.W. Bush’s presidency was weak, but not as bad as it was for his son, where it was absolutely abysmal.
All hail Obama.
I realize that as an ideologue the truth doesn't make you feel stupid.
The article was non-specific BECAUSE it didn't want to state the obvious...the majority of jobs created were LOW-WAGE jobs.
YOU provide an article proving Obama created millions of high paying careers.
But you can't and the article you DID provide PROVED that you can't.
Still looking for your......LINKLinkThe very link YOU just provided.LinkI applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.Let’s start with a simple measure, the average number of jobs created per year of their presidency (which will allow us to compare one-termers and two-termers). Here’s what it looks like:
So Bill Clinton comes out best, followed by Jimmy Carter (bet you didn’t know that), followed by Reagan and then Obama. Job growth during George H.W. Bush’s presidency was weak, but not as bad as it was for his son, where it was absolutely abysmal.
All hail Obama.
I realize that as an ideologue the truth doesn't make you feel stupid.
The article was non-specific BECAUSE it didn't want to state the obvious...the majority of jobs created were LOW-WAGE jobs.
YOU provide an article proving Obama created millions of high paying careers.
But you can't and the article you DID provide PROVED that you can't.
Nice try...
The onus is on the Obama fan.
The very link YOU just provided.
The article was non-specific BECAUSE it didn't want to state the obvious...the majority of jobs created were LOW-WAGE jobs.
YOU provide an article proving Obama created millions of high paying careers.
But you can't and the article you DID provide PROVED that you can't.
Feel foolish yet?
Still looking for your......LINKLinkThe very link YOU just provided.LinkI applaud Obama for spearheading an unprecedented number of low wage jobs in America.
All hail Obama.
I realize that as an ideologue the truth doesn't make you feel stupid.
The article was non-specific BECAUSE it didn't want to state the obvious...the majority of jobs created were LOW-WAGE jobs.
YOU provide an article proving Obama created millions of high paying careers.
But you can't and the article you DID provide PROVED that you can't.
Nice try...
The onus is on the Obama fan.
The very link YOU just provided.
The article was non-specific BECAUSE it didn't want to state the obvious...the majority of jobs created were LOW-WAGE jobs.
YOU provide an article proving Obama created millions of high paying careers.
But you can't and the article you DID provide PROVED that you can't.
Feel foolish yet?
Why didn't he deport all of them ? He has failed in protecting the American people from illegal immigration.Obama has deported more than Bush did.
Good point. With Obama's ludicrous catch & release system, they go back across the border, and come right back in again. When Eisenhower deported millions in Operation Wetback in 1954, the deported aliens were shipped to South Mexico. Most never came back again.Probably because he changed the definition of deportation. Now it means if the border patrol sends you back over the line, it's considered being deported.
1. What the hell does Bush have to do with it ?Well let's go to the record
Clinton and Obama ...32 million jobs created
The two Bushes......slightly under 4 million jobs
I'll go with Hillary on this one
Trump has amassed a fortune of $10 Billion, but he has no clue about business economics, huh ? The one who has no clue, is YOU.Well seeing I lost a great job at the end of the Dubya administration when the economy cratered, and it hasn't since Obama has been in charge; and that Clinton will likely keep things moving along like Obama yes I think I will be OK.
Trump is elected he will leave Pence in charge since Trump has no clue and is running on popularity of the gullible and stupid. Pence would likely be a worse Dubya. No thanks to that insanity.
No. I'm going to take early retirement and live off of my investments, which will double in value while she is president.