Will the Gubment Ban Knives?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by American_Jihad, Dec 4, 2012.

  1. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    6,192
    Likes Received:
    1,292
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +1,292 / 0 / -0
  2. konradv
    Offline

    konradv VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    15,061
    Likes Received:
    1,322
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +1,350 / 20 / -0
    Well we'd certainly want to keep them away from people like you. Children should be properly supervised when dealing with sharp objects.
  3. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Silver Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    20,077
    Likes Received:
    2,581
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +2,632 / 41 / -0
    Children and paranoid schizophrenics.
  4. Katzndogz
    Online

    Katzndogz Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    44,234
    Likes Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +4,113 / 35 / -0
    Will it work in the UK?

    BBC NEWS | Health | Doctors' kitchen knives ban call

    A team from West Middlesex University Hospital said violent crime is on the increase - and kitchen knives are used in as many as half of all stabbings.

    They argued many assaults are committed impulsively, prompted by alcohol and drugs, and a kitchen knife often makes an all too available weapon.

    The research is published in the British Medical Journal.

    The researchers said there was no reason for long pointed knives to be publicly available at all.
  5. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Likes Received:
    9,817
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,817 / 0 / -0
    you should pray they don't ban stupid
  6. LogikAndReazon
    Offline

    LogikAndReazon VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,166
    Likes Received:
    364
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +380 / 4 / -0
    Gentlemen: I see that you have chosen to use the horrific crime of the murder of Kasandra Perkins to express your belief that guns are the problem, not the men who wield them. I am utterly certain that you believe that you have the moral high ground on this matter. I am equally certain that such a belief is appallingly wrong, not to mention terribly misogynistic. Why do I say this? Because had your desires on gun control been in place, I would not be alive to be writing this now.

    I have an Ex. I have an Ex who, in the process of becoming my Ex, made credible threats to kill me. Why did I believe these threats were credible? Because among the primary reasons why I left him were that he had anger control issues, that he was a problem drinker well on his way to full blown alcoholism and that the things he was throwing at me were getting ever closer to my head. I decided to leave before finally snapped and actually hit me. He was displeased by this and made such displeasure known.

    Do you know what kept me safe? Not some piece of paper. Not a judge tut tutting at him and shaking his/her finger and telling him to leave me alone. Not the police, who, after all, would only be able to respond once he had caused me harm. No, what kept me safe was my Glock. What kept me safe was my Glock and the fact that he knew I had both the ability and the will to empty a clip into his chest if he made good on his statements that if I did not come back, I would not see the next week. He never tried to do any of the things he screamed he would because he knew that not only would I defend myself but that I could. My Ex was nearly a foot taller than me and, at the time, had about 150 pounds on me. If he had been able to get close enough to me to harm me, there were very few options I had to protect myself. But with my Glock, well, I would be able to stop him before he got that close. I am alive today because he knew that if he tried to make that otherwise, there was a better than even chance he would be the one lying there in a pool of blood instead of me.

    You want to take that from me. You want me to be unable to defend myself. You want to leave me vulnerable to those out there who look at a five foot tall fat girl and think “victim”. You want me to be unable to protect myself when there is no one else around to do so. You want to make me dependent on others to provide for my basic safety and security.

    Let us not beat around the bush, you want to sacrifice my life on the altar of your political beliefs. How dare you? Honestly, who do the two of you think you are to demand that my blood be shed so that you may preen about what wonderful people you are? Why, precisely, are you removing the responsibility for Kasandra Perkins’ murder from Jovan Belcher and placing it on an inanimate object? That is what you are doing, after all. Your position is that absent the gun, Jovan Belcher would not have murdered Kasandra Perkins. What utter rot. It’s not as if, to pick something at random, he could have picked up a knife and slit her throat so violently that she was nearly decapitated. Oh no, that would never ever happen. By focusing on the gun, you are choosing to make Jovan Belcher a mere bystander to his own actions. That is horrific. Jovan Belcher murdered Kasandra Perkins. He chose to pull that trigger. He chose to take her life. How dare you attempt to absolve him in even the slightest manner for that crime. He killed her. Not a gun. He did it. No one else.

    I will not let you two demand that my blood be shed so that you can sit there and declaim your supposed superior morality to the world. No. You would rather I be dead. That is the logical conclusion of your positions. I will not die for you. No other woman should either.

    Alive despite you,

    Alexandria

    An open letter to Bob Costas and Jason Whitlock « doubleplusundead
    • Like Like x 1
  7. eflatminor
    Offline

    eflatminor Classical Liberal

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,393
    Likes Received:
    1,231
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,232 / 0 / -0
    Didn't work when they banned firearms.

    In 1997, England banned handguns. By 2000, handgun homicides skyrocketed to an all time high. The city of London set a new record for murders. By 2001, street robberies were up 28%, violent crime up 11%, murders up 4% and rape increased 14%. This trend continued in through 2004 with a 10% increase in street crime, 8% increase in muggings, and a 22% increase in robberies. Bottom line, in the decade that followed, the rate at which firearms were used in crime doubled...and this during an economic boom!

    Australia's ban on firearms turned out even worse.

    But hey, it's what FEELS right...right?
  8. American_Jihad
    Offline

    American_Jihad Flaming Libs/Koranimals

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    6,192
    Likes Received:
    1,292
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
    Ratings:
    +1,292 / 0 / -0
    You need to get an Anti-Glare Guard for your monitor...rolmao
  9. Politico
    Offline

    Politico VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,732
    Likes Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Ratings:
    +687 / 9 / -0
    What a stupid ass question.

Share This Page