Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes. If he lives through the events.With the targeting of civilians and residential areas, will Putin be eventually charged with war crimes?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.smh...01-p5a0s2.html
Vladimir Putin accused of war crimes as civilians, children killed in mass shelling
The US in Korea isn't the subjectNo.
USA committed much greater War Crimes -- particularly in Korea and Vietnam. Generals were not charged.
It is called legal precedent.The US in Korea isn't the subject
I think there is the possibility of him being taken out by someone close to him. Supposedly he's becoming paranoid and more secluded.I think he will be killed by his own security before he's ever held accountable in a court. When all the trappings are removed, he's really just a crime boss. Unfortunately, he's a crime boss with access to nukes. After this adventure, he cannot expect to be re-elected so he will be unable to hide behind a mask of "democracy" any longer. That makes him more dangerous for all concerned.
Will Putin Be Charged With War Crimes?
Do you not know how that process works? Read this..By whom?
www.kgw.com
No.
USA committed much greater War Crimes -- particularly in Korea and Vietnam. Generals were not charged.
Do you not know how that process works? Read this..
No, the UN doesn’t have the authority to charge people with war crimes
International and domestic courts, including the International Criminal Court, can charge people with war crimes and prosecute them.
why did you leave out vietnam? .His point is spot on,does not matter if its not about the topic,it is relevent to it cause thats how history is.politicians commit crimes everyday we go to jail for so what he is saying is a great analogy and is spot on correct.The US in Korea isn't the subject
Past US actions is not the subject.why did you leave out vietnam? .His point is spot on,does not matter if its not about the topic,it is relevent to it cause thats how history is.politicians commit crimes everyday we go to jail for so what he is saying is a great analogy and is spot on correct.
he will no more be charged than all the war mongering mass murdering presidents we have had this century wer ever charged with war crimes against humanity.
Can you address the subject or not?Only countries that recognize the ICC (signatories to The Rome Statute) can be prosecuted by the ICC. Both Russia and the US have stated publicly that ICC has NO JURISDICTION over them.
There is no extra-territorial body that can try Russian (or American) citizens for war crimes so ... I repeat ...
Tried for war crimes by whom?
your evading the facts which prove WHY he wont be charged. see you ina few years from now on this thread to rub it in you did not know what you were talking about.Past US actions is not the subject.
Leaders have been charged in the past with war crimes and or crimes against humanity.
I'm not evading any facts. If you don't want to discuss the issue, fine. Don't.your evading the facts which prove WHY he wont be charged.
Can you address the subject or not?
George Bush, Dick Cheney and several other administration officials were convicted of war crimes in abstensia by a foreign court . The discussion isn't about whether or not the convictions are legit.How is asking who can actually charge The Russian Leader with war crimes not addressing the subject?
If there is no body who can charge him then the answer is an unequivocal "No" ... he won't be charged.
George Bush, Dick Cheney and several other administration officials were convicted of war crimes in abstensia by a foreign court . The discussion isn't about whether or not the convictions are legit.
The discussion is about will anyone charge Putin with war crimes and get a conviction and what woukd that mean
There's a long list of leaders and soldiers who have been charged and convicted of war crimesHow is asking who can actually charge The Russian Leader with war crimes not addressing the subject?
If there is no body who can charge him then the answer is an unequivocal "No" ... he won't be charged.
