The Questions Carlson Won't Be Asking Putin

I have always supported paying for kicking the USSR and Russia in the nuts, dipshit.

This isolationist bullshit is what is going to lead us into WWIII. Just like "America First" isolationists in America and isolationists in Europe helped lead the world into WWII.

america-first.jpg
And it was our isolationism that allowed us to win both wars with relatively low losses and pretty good profit. The last who join a war (with the largest gun) takes all the chips.

WWIII is inevitable anyway. The only thing that we can do is to minimize our losses and maximize our profits. And, at least, it means that we shouldn't be the very first victim of it.
 
Last edited:
I'm talking about WWI and WWII. We didn't start them, we joined when all sides were pretty exhausted, and then we, with relatively low losses, took all the chips from the table.
You need to study history. The U.S. suffered massive fatalities in both WWI and WWII.
 
I'm talking about WWI and WWII. We didn't start them, we joined when all sides were pretty exhausted, and then we, with relatively low losses, took all the chips from the table?
I’m still wondering where you got the idea that US fatalities in WWI and WWII were relatively low and we got into those conflicts when our enemies were depleted.

We got into WWII against Germany quite early and the war in the pacific was brought to us. Over 400,000 American military members were killed in WWII.

German and Japanese forces were anything but depleted. Germany was at the height of their power when we declared war. Early in that conflict US forces were getting their asses kicked.


The U.S. did enter WWI late, because Germany was basically defeating the rest of Europe. The Germans were not depleted. The US still sustained almost 60,000 combat deaths and another 60,000 non combat deaths.
 
Last edited:
How about "Tell Vlad I can be more flexible after the election". Oooops! That was Obama.
Is that the same Obama that put a boot up Russia's ass with international sanctions for annexing Ukraine?

Putin was kinda sore that his economy went into recession for two years after that and did all he cound to get a useful idiot named Trump elected in 2016.
 
Is that the same Obama that put a boot up Russia's ass with international sanctions for annexing Ukraine?

Putin was kinda sore that his economy went into recession for two years after that and did all he cound to get a useful idiot named Trump elected in 2016.
You mean his "RED LINE"? What a failure. He didn't do dick.
 
Is that the same Obama that put a boot up Russia's ass with international sanctions for annexing Ukraine?

Putin was kinda sore that his economy went into recession for two years after that and did all he cound to get a useful idiot named Trump elected in 2016.
Obama ordered travel restriction. Yeah. That was a real “boot up their ass.”
 
I’m still wondering where you got the idea that US fatalities in WWI and WWII were relatively low and we got into those conflicts when our enemies were depleted.

We got into WWII against Germany quite early and the war in the pacific was brought to us. Over 400,000 American military members were killed in WWII.

German and Japanese forces were anything but depleted. Germany was at the height of their power when we declared war. Early in that conflict US forces were getting their asses kicked.


The U.S. did enter WWI late, because Germany was basically defeating the rest of Europe. The Germans were not depleted. The US still sustained almost 60,000 combat deaths and another 60,000 non combat deaths.
In WWI the USA lost only 0,1% of population. Almost nothing, comparing with other belligerents. Russia - 1,6%. France - 4%. Germany - 4%. Ottoman Empire - 15%. Serbia - 30%.
 
In WWI the USA lost only 0,1% of population. Almost nothing, comparing with other belligerents. Russia - 1,6%. France - 4%. Germany - 4%. Ottoman Empire - 15%. Serbia - 30%.
The U.S. suffered heavy fatalities in both WWI and WWII. The claim that the U.S. got involved only after the enemy forces were depleted is pure idiocy.
 
The U.S. suffered heavy fatalities in both WWI and WWII. The claim that the U.S. got involved only after the enemy forces were depleted is pure idiocy.
It all depend on the definition of the term "heavy fatalities". What possible outcome of the WWIII you see as preferred?
1) The USA is the initiator of WWIII, lost 30-50% of the population during the years of the conflict and does not exist as a significant political force in 2040.
2) The USA start active military actions only after all other nuclear states lost most of their military, nuclear and industrial capabilities, and, therefore - the USA lost only 0,1% of the population, and write the terms of the post-WWIII world order.
 
It all depend on the definition of the term "heavy fatalities". What possible outcome of the WWIII you see as preferred?
1) The USA is the initiator of WWIII, lost 30-50% of the population during the years of the conflict and does not exist as a significant political force in 2040.
2) The USA start active military actions only after all other nuclear states lost most of their military, nuclear and industrial capabilities, and, therefore - the USA lost only 0,1% of the population, and write the terms of the post-WWIII world order.
What was that gibberish about? WWIII hasn’t happened yet.
 

The Questions Carlson Won't Be Asking Putin​


Wow. Your whiny thread and your whiny-ass bitch reaction go a long way to show how Tucker has totally OWNED and embarrassed all of the hapless MSM who in two years collectively never once even tried to send ONE PERSON to Russia to get Putin's POV and now it is just KILLING you!

He has made all of you look like idiots! Worthless, facile idiots! :auiqs.jpg:

One guy fired from Fox has done more journalism in a few months than ALL of the MSM has given us in a DECADE! :laugh2:
 

Forum List

Back
Top