Wikileaks reveals WMDs

The extreme wacks are exposed by their evidence such as this: "These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.”

This is why folks like Solace and Avatar431 are given no consideration.

JokeSnarky... 109 Facilites... Locked and Sealed by the UN just Prior to our Invasion...

Empty once we got to them...

God Damned Son-of-Bitch-Bastard Frogs and our Absurd Need to Entertain their Shittiness...

:)

peace...
 
Gawd you guys are dumb.

If there were these WMD's, Bush would have been crowing from the roof of the White House. He didn't. What does that tell you?

Give it up. We were all tricked by Bush and the Republicans.

Iraq

The economy

the Katrina aftermath

Ignoring Enron

Spending

No bid contracts

The energy policy

The drugs for votes bill

Moving jobs to China

Bush and the Republicans squat on this country and especially the Middle Class. That's the REAL story.
 
The extreme wacks are exposed by their evidence such as this: "These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.”

This is why folks like Solace and Avatar431 are given no consideration.

Thank you for proving my point.
 
The extreme wacks are exposed by their evidence such as this: "These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.”

This is why folks like Solace and Avatar431 are given no consideration.

JokeSnarky... 109 Facilites... Locked and Sealed by the UN just Prior to our Invasion...

Empty once we got to them...

God Damned Son-of-Bitch-Bastard Frogs and our Absurd Need to Entertain their Shittiness...

:)

peace...

Love you, Mal and Avitar, but you got it wrong. The Frogs are allies, the Iraqis are not, and you had best re-read your history. Don't twist your facts to fit your theories. Adjust the facts to fit the theories. That is called critical thinking. Bush would have told us if WMDs were found, doncha think?
 
Last edited:
There were 109 Facilites that were Locked and Sealed by the UN that had Banned Long Range Missiles and WMD...

By the time were done playing footsies with the French at the UN and we Finally Invaded, those Facilities had been Emptied...

Google it.

They aren't "Never Existed"... They are Fucking MISSING.

:)

peace...

"In its May 22, 2004 edition, the New York Times confirmed a myriad of reports on Saddam's nuclear fuel stockpile - and revealed a chilling detail unknown to weapons inspectors before the war: that Saddam had begun to partially enrich his uranium stash.

The Times noted:

"The repository, at Tuwaitha, a centerpiece of Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program, . . . . holds more than 500 tons of uranium . . . . Some 1.8 tons is classified as low-enriched uranium."

Thomas B. Cochran, director of the nuclear program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told the Times that "the low-enriched version could be useful to a nation with nuclear ambitions."

"A country like Iran," Mr. Cochran said, "could convert that into weapons-grade material with a lot fewer centrifuges than would be required with natural uranium."

Saddam's 500-ton Uranium Stockpile


All available intelligence data, from every nation that contributed same, as well Democrats such as President Clinton informed the policy.

Even Joe Wilson, who fabricated the NYTimes Op-Ed where he claimed there was no yellow cake connection, agreed that Iraq had sent agents for purchase in Chad, thus contributed to the data.

Data informs policy.


"The famous “16 words” in President Bush’s Jan. 28, 2003 State of the Union address turn out to have a basis in fact after all, according to two recently released investigations in the US and Britain."
•A separate report by the US Senate Intelligence Committee said July 7 that the US also had similar information from “a number of intelligence reports,” a fact that was classified at the time Bush spoke.
•Ironically, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who later called Bush’s 16 words a “lie”, supplied information that the Central Intelligence Agency took as confirmation that Iraq may indeed have been seeking uranium from Niger. "

FactCheck.org: Bush's "16 Words" on Iraq & Uranium: He May Have Been Wrong But He Wasn't Lying
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: mal
PC's nonsense is answered in #9 above. And, PC, once again you mistake the role of the use of fact. Reputable thinkers don't twist facts to fit theories, but that is what you do.
 
Gawd you guys are dumb.

If there were these WMD's, Bush would have been crowing from the roof of the White House. He didn't. What does that tell you?

Give it up. We were all tricked by Bush and the Republicans.

Iraq

The economy

the Katrina aftermath

Ignoring Enron

Spending

No bid contracts

The energy policy

The drugs for votes bill

Moving jobs to China

Bush and the Republicans squat on this country and especially the Middle Class. That's the REAL story.
Yes, The President of the United States has the power to order business to move jobs to another country....Now, who is being stupid?
 
Only the hyper-left internet k00ks think there were never WMD's in Iraq.............the rest of the world, including most high level Dem leaders publically stated they were there............its not even debatable.
 
g276258000000000000ebb2873c53edcdf7e3d2462fff6d1aa8ca7321d2.jpg



I love this forum............several reasons to get giddy every single fcukking day!!!
 
most of the people we trained became the northern alliance, and we did NOT work with Bin Laden at all

This is demonstrably false. Do you really wanna open yourself up to that? The evidence that bin Laden was a CIA asset is glacier like. If you could avoid the vitriol for once, I'd be happy to engage you in that debate.

Ready? If not, retract your statement please.
no, it isnt
short of nutter conspiracy sites

dive, you are the nutter conspiracy case on this, and if you push it, you will lose badly. Just sneak away.
 
This is demonstrably false. Do you really wanna open yourself up to that? The evidence that bin Laden was a CIA asset is glacier like. If you could avoid the vitriol for once, I'd be happy to engage you in that debate.

Ready? If not, retract your statement please.
no, it isnt
short of nutter conspiracy sites

dive, you are the nutter conspiracy case on this, and if you push it, you will lose badly. Just sneak away.
wrong again, jokey
there is no credible evidence that Bin Laden had any connections with the CIA
 
Talk about a bad week for the k00ks..............1) Its election week 2) Study comes out linking a gene in the brain and liberals ie: mental disorder 3) WMD's found.


ProstateExam-2.jpg



And Sarah Palin still causes mental meltdowns.............
 
PC's nonsense is answered in #9 above. And, PC, once again you mistake the role of the use of fact. Reputable thinkers don't twist facts to fit theories, but that is what you do.

Joe Wilson's famous trip to Niamey notwithstanding, intelligence analysts generally accept that Iraq made overtures to Niger about purchasing "yellow cake" uranium in 1999. This conclusion has been endorsed by both the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee report on Iraq War intelligence and by the British Butler Report. To the best of our knowledge, then, the "16 words" were in fact true. It is not known, on the other hand, whether any deal was actually concluded. As so happens, however, whether or not Iraq obtained uranium from Niger in or after 1999, the inference that the Iraqi nuclear program could not have posed a threat without its having done so is not only obviously problematic on logical grounds -- it is also demonstrably false.

It is well known and well documented that Iraq already possessed some 500 hundred or so tons of "yellow cake" uranium, most of it imported from Portugal and Niger in the early 1980s. (See here, for example, under "yellow cake inventory," from a 1991 IAEA report.) It is, above all, this fact that has been made to disappear from public view by the theatrics surrounding the "16 words." It is worth noting in this connection that the forged documents that were used, along with the Wilson trip, to discredit the administration's arguments reportedly referred to a purchase of some 500 tons of yellow cake: i.e. around the size of Iraq's actual yellow cake stocks. This curious detail suggests that the obfuscation was not accidental. In any case, if Iraq was interested in enriching uranium for weapons use -- which would have been the purpose of importing unenriched "yellow cake" -- it already had ample stocks on hand for doing so.
WPR Article | 16 Words, 500 Tons and 28 Kilograms: the Iraqi Nuclear Program Revisited

"This curious detail suggests that the obfuscation was not accidental."
So, the leftists tried to muddy the waters so that the easily led, and not-too-bright are fooled.

See, Jakey, that's where you come in....
 

Forum List

Back
Top