Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.Irrelevant... They become less numerous all the time according to your own stats... They are already well regulated. End of story.Bullshit. New old stock parts are readily available for any firearm you can think of. Ebay is even a great source for firearms parts: If I have a firearm that's not worth restoring or would cost too much to restore, I part the damned thing out and sell the parts on Ebay for pretty good money. I can pick up junk guns at garage sales for around $20 and make a couple hundred dollars off the parts alone.
So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
There are journalists and then there are GOP Fox Rush heritage Etc bought off scumbag propagandists, dupe. Only GOP Dupes don't know it.In Bizarro GOP dupe world Maybe. Link to anything? LOL!And he just keeps at it. A real glutton for punishment. Lol
he knows it that he is a joke
continue to wallow in your willful ignorancetry watching real newsThought exactly that when I saw it. Like their claim of 97% of scientists believe in global warming. Lol97% want background checks fixed. If you think most people want machine guns being produced and sold, you're nuttier than I thought...You guys lie all the time. Typical propagandist. You probably believe mugabe received 95% of the vote too...
What's funny is you people trot out these 97% fictions all of the time yet can never link to a legit source for the claim.
Poll: 97 percent support background checks for all gun buyers | TheHill
thehill.com › blogs › news › 37...
Feb 20, 2018 · Ninety-seven percent of those surveyed in the Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday said they support requiring background checks for all gun ...
97 percent of Americans want universal background checks for gun buyers. 67 ...
theweek.com › speedreads › 97-percent-...
Feb 20, 2018 · A new poll by Quinnipiac University published Tuesday found that a stunning majority of Americans are in favor of more stringent gun laws. A whopping 97 percent of ...
Do 90% of Americans support background checks for all gun sales? | PolitiFact ...
That's not news. That is propaganda. We know it, and so do you.
There are journalists and GOP Fox Rush heritage Etc bought off scumbag propagandists.In Bizarro GOP dupe world Maybe. Link to anything? LOL!he knows it that he is a joke
continue to wallow in your willful ignorancetry watching real newsThought exactly that when I saw it. Like their claim of 97% of scientists believe in global warming. Lol97% want background checks fixed. If you think most people want machine guns being produced and sold, you're nuttier than I thought...
What's funny is you people trot out these 97% fictions all of the time yet can never link to a legit source for the claim.
Poll: 97 percent support background checks for all gun buyers | TheHill
thehill.com › blogs › news › 37...
Feb 20, 2018 · Ninety-seven percent of those surveyed in the Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday said they support requiring background checks for all gun ...
97 percent of Americans want universal background checks for gun buyers. 67 ...
theweek.com › speedreads › 97-percent-...
Feb 20, 2018 · A new poll by Quinnipiac University published Tuesday found that a stunning majority of Americans are in favor of more stringent gun laws. A whopping 97 percent of ...
Do 90% of Americans support background checks for all gun sales? | PolitiFact ...
That's not news. That is propaganda. We know it, and so do you.
Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.Irrelevant... They become less numerous all the time according to your own stats... They are already well regulated. End of story.Bullshit. New old stock parts are readily available for any firearm you can think of. Ebay is even a great source for firearms parts: If I have a firearm that's not worth restoring or would cost too much to restore, I part the damned thing out and sell the parts on Ebay for pretty good money. I can pick up junk guns at garage sales for around $20 and make a couple hundred dollars off the parts alone.
So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.Irrelevant... They become less numerous all the time according to your own stats... They are already well regulated. End of story.
So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
As it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.Irrelevant... They become less numerous all the time according to your own stats... They are already well regulated. End of story.
So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
You are referring to Communists in poor countries. Socialism is in all successful modern countries, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net, always democratic. And there are plenty of rich ones, because they know a healthy economy for everyone is best for everyone. Even the United States barely qualifies as long as we have ACA.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
Sorry. According to the leftist idiots, you're not allowed to invest your money in highly-appreciable items like NFA weapons.
Since they are all socialists, you must be poor like they are. You know: Share the pain and misery, and all that.
I am with the great majority in our Republic d u h.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.Irrelevant... They become less numerous all the time according to your own stats... They are already well regulated. End of story.
So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
Why would civilians owning machine guns be in your opinion, "idiotic"?
Why should you care what they do with their money, if they're law-abiding citizens? Are they infringing on your right or something? Do you need to go hide in your safe space because someone owns something that you don't like?
Have you ever been robbed or intimidated by someone with a fully-automatic weapon or something?
Do you think that everyone should own a dinky gas-efficient hybrid car, even though more powerful albeit less-efficient cars and trucks are on the market to anyone who can afford them?
Who the heck are you to tell anyone what they can or cannot spend their money on? Do I tell you what you can or cannot spend your money on?
As it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
As it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.So if that are already "well regulated", what's your problem with any law-abiding citizen owning them?
Likewise, if there are already laws on the books which disqualifies criminals from purchasing firearms, what makes you think that additional laws would also work?
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
Owning machine guns d u h. In small numbers. Want a diagram?As it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
Oh? So you have no problem with RICH people owning guns. Is that what you are saying?
Until they do... And of of course they get stolen et ceteraAs it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.The regulation that is good is that they are no longer produced for civilians and are no longer a threat d u h.
Obviously the laws need more teeth d u h. Something is really wrong with your brains, dupes.
They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
A "collector" is a law-abiding person who has no intent to use his collection for illegal purposes.
So you do you have a problem with other law-abiding gun owners who wouldn't even think of committing a crime with their firearms?
Fine. Melt the machine guns down.Arguing that money alone should be the arbiter of weapon accessibility is so utterly absurd that no one with the slightest idea of what society is and how it functions could even propose it without laughing at the joke.
Arguing that money alone should be the arbiter of weapon accessibility is so utterly absurd that no one with the slightest idea of what society is and how it functions could even propose it without laughing at the joke.
Arguing that money alone should be the arbiter of weapon accessibility is so utterly absurd that no one with the slightest idea of what society is and how it functions could even propose it without laughing at the joke.
Until they do... And of of course they get stolen et ceteraAs it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
A "collector" is a law-abiding person who has no intent to use his collection for illegal purposes.
So you do you have a problem with other law-abiding gun owners who wouldn't even think of committing a crime with their firearms?
Until they do... And of of course they get stolen et ceteraAs it is with so few in the hands of collectors, I have no problem.Actually if you had the money you could buy them no no problem. Civilians having machine guns is idiotic. Just be glad collectors can get them and they can't be produced anymore for civilian use.They never were a threat....duh. The gangsters stole them from the cops, and the military, but they rarely did anything to the civilian population with them. Most criminals knew back then to leave the civilian population alone. Which is why when there was an aberration, such as bonnie and clyde, or jesse james, who actively sought to kill civilians, they were reviled and hunted down fairly quickly because the general population hated them.
I own five of them. I used to own a lot more of them but when they jumped in value to absurd levels I sold the bulk of my collection and bought a airplane and hangar with the money. Why do you believe it is idiotic for civilians to own guns that PROVABLY have not been used in crime. Since the NFA was passed back in 1934 the only recorded instance of a legally owned machinegun being used to commit a crime was a POLICEMAN who murdered his wife with one.
A "collector" is a law-abiding person who has no intent to use his collection for illegal purposes.
So you do you have a problem with other law-abiding gun owners who wouldn't even think of committing a crime with their firearms?
It is possible the quoted post was mis-understood; it implied that it is absurd to permit people to have any weapon money could buy simply because they have enough money. Money already has grotesquely too much hold over life.Fine. Melt the machine guns down.Arguing that money alone should be the arbiter of weapon accessibility is so utterly absurd that no one with the slightest idea of what society is and how it functions could even propose it without laughing at the joke.
I have no problem with the rich, just the greedy a******GOP type who are robbing the the country and the NoN rich blind while brainwashing half the country. They are a disgrace.Arguing that money alone should be the arbiter of weapon accessibility is so utterly absurd that no one with the slightest idea of what society is and how it functions could even propose it without laughing at the joke.
Especially when the person espousing that idea go's to such great pains to denigrate the rich (supposedly), and claim that a socialist world is the ideal.
