- Oct 20, 2013
- 56,324
- 18,002
- 2,250
Lots of useless and pointless knowledge/words. Ho hum.Section 3 is controlling when a former President is involved, section 2 clearly does not apply.
Bill Clinton possesses digital audio recording from his presidency which are recordings of him doing official business including speaking with foreign leaders. The court said these were his personal records and the Archive had no right to them.
On a practical level, the possibility of judicial review raises a host of questions. If it is available, why is the PRA entirely silent on the subject?Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com