Why Republicans need to crush the Tea Party by electing Hillary Clinton.

[bripat9643]

The Tea Party has shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no Unity. You have the majority that are moderate Republicans--then you've got the right or should I say Reich wing of the party that has cost Republicans the election in 2012 and now 2016. It's out of ignorance of what government can and cannot do.

A great article describing why Mitt Romney lost in 2012 is here:
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing

In 2012 the Evangelical wing of the party decided to make their platform about abortion. Of course abortion is a 45 year old settled U.S. Supreme court issue, but for some reason they still think it's a political one. This of course then went into who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what was legal legitimate rape questions, that were always answered by an ancient white male Republican. This sent women, the largest voting block in this country, running into Barack Obama's column by double digits, younger women by 36 points. Basically they were "offended" into giving Barack Obama a 2nd term.
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump
Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

In 2016, it's another large voting block that Republicans need, Hispanics. 17% of the population or 23 million Latino's have been "offended" into voting for Hillary Clinton. Of course in 2012, one of the platform topics was immigration/deporation and Romney only captured 27% of this block. The last Republican President to win was G. W Bush and he captured 44% of this block. The GOP nominee, since Reagan has had to capture at least 40% of this block to win the White House. This year it's 46%. Trump is polling at a Negative 80% with this block.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

The Tea Party, is lead by Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwddd-d Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing talk show hosts that fill their audiences with 3 or more daily hours of right wing hyperbole for political entertainment and profits. They promote candidates based on this hyperbole, such as Ted Cruz a Canadian born candidate, that would be certain to be challenged on his eligibility. He is too far right to win a National election. Women nor Independents would vote for him. They have promoted Donald Trump to their audiences, another one that could not possibly win the White House, and is really only good at driving people off. These right wing talk shows hosts have incited this anger within the Republican party, and exploited this ignorance and bigotry.

In order to save the Republican party, the Tea Party and their leaders must be crushed. Hillary Clinton must win in a landslide election. Otherwise the next Republican President hasn't been born yet.
I’ll Take Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

Find someone else to carry out your leftwing fantasies. Smashing the Democrat party is what needs to be done.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The GOP will never win another presidential election with nutters like Kasich or huntsman... They are just spineless dems really.

Kasich would absolutely obliterate Hillary Clinton. Ohio general election polling shows him beating her there by like 17 points. Granted, he's the governor, so he should have a decent lead, but that's pretty significant. If he actually did that in Ohio on Election Day he'd also win Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, probably even New Jersey and states that have eluded Republicans since Reagan.

And where are you getting this nonsense that Kasich is more like a Democrat? The man was one of the architects of the closest thing we've had in my lifetime to a balanced budget back in the 90s

 

[bripat9643]

I don't think the Tea Party has done much of anything, and are moot.

You want to get them energized, just elect the hildabitch. Which is a probability that is shrinking by the minute.

You've already cost us another election. Hillary Clinton will be the next POTUS.

Don't worry though, Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwwddd-d and all the others will be there the morning after to help you blow your noses and wipe your tears, while giving you another bullshit reason as to why you got your ass's kicked. You'll lap it up and then start the process all over again for 2020.

Let’s Elect Hillary Now

Who is "us?" Are you claiming to be a Republican? ROFL!

I love these left-wing fantasy understandings of how Republicans think.

 

[OnePercenter]

I don't think the Tea Party has done much of anything, and are moot.

You want to get them energized, just elect the hildabitch. Which is a probability that is shrinking by the minute.

You've already cost us another election. Hillary Clinton will be the next POTUS.

Don't worry though, Mr. Talent on loan from Gawwwwwddd-d and all the others will be there the morning after to help you blow your noses and wipe your tears, while giving you another bullshit reason as to why you got your ass's kicked. You'll lap it up and then start the process all over again for 2020.

Let’s Elect Hillary Now

Who is "us?" Are you claiming to be a Republican? ROFL!

I love these left-wing fantasy understandings of how Republicans think.

Who is "us?" Are you claiming to be a Republican? ROFL!

Don't you claim to be an American?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Mitt would be President if went after Obama the way he's going after Trump

 

[Dot Com]

why you got to talk like an am radio listenin' tard OKTexas

Why do you feel the need to support a criminal bitch that endangers national security and gets people killed because she can't effectively run one dept of government? Only a real retard would think it's a good idea to make her responsible for the whole thing.

you have info the repub witch hunt couldn't find retard boi?

link? (and not from a rw kool aid site kid)

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Who is "they"? link?

 

[Dot Com]

Mitt would be President if went after Obama the way he's going after Trump

lol

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't think the Tea Party has done much of anything, and are moot.

You're joking right--LOL

Wait, do you think Trump is "Tea Party?"

 

[Uncensored2008]

Find someone else to carry out your leftwing fantasies. Smashing the Democrat party is what needs to be done.

I feel his pain though, unless Republicans vote for Hilliary, she has zero chance of winning. So this is his desperate plea to "please, please vote for the crook!"

 

[Uncensored2008]

Kasich would absolutely obliterate Hillary Clinton. Ohio general election polling shows him beating her there by like 17 points. Granted, he's the governor, so he should have a decent lead, but that's pretty significant. If he actually did that in Ohio on Election Day he'd also win Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, probably even New Jersey and states that have eluded Republicans since Reagan.

And where are you getting this nonsense that Kasich is more like a Democrat? The man was one of the architects of the closest thing we've had in my lifetime to a balanced budget back in the 90s

Anyone but Jeb Bush will obliterate Hillary, which is why the dims here were so desperate for Jeb to the nominee.

The only chance Hillary has is a split party - which may be in the works.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Don't you claim to be an American?

Don't you claim to be a telecommunications mogul (who doesn't know what a LEC is...)?

 

[bripat9643]

Don't you claim to be an American?

Don't you claim to be a telecommunications mogul (who doesn't know what a LEC is...)?

Yep, and he claims his business is worth $420 million.

 

[OKTexas]

Why do you feel the need to support a criminal bitch that endangers national security and gets people killed because she can't effectively run one dept of government? Only a real retard would think it's a good idea to make her responsible for the whole thing.

you have info the repub witch hunt couldn't find retard boi?

link? (and not from a rw kool aid site kid)

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Ahh but it does. I understand your unwillingness to address it as it would destroy your narrative. Suppose those mails you referenced were only classified later as a result of a judicial order that would make them public years after her tenure at state. Is that a violation of any law? Context is everything unless you're not interested in the truth.

Of course you have a link.

 

[OKTexas]

Why do you feel the need to support a criminal bitch that endangers national security and gets people killed because she can't effectively run one dept of government? Only a real retard would think it's a good idea to make her responsible for the whole thing.

you have info the repub witch hunt couldn't find retard boi?

link? (and not from a rw kool aid site kid)

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

 

[Dot Com]

you have info the repub witch hunt couldn't find retard boi?

link? (and not from a rw kool aid site kid)

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

So no link?

 

[OKTexas]

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

So no link?

Nope, haven't been able to find one link that reveals what intel agencies were assisting State in the screening. I do know at least one was not released due to a request from law enforcement. The only law enforcement involved, that I know of, is the FBI.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

you have info the repub witch hunt couldn't find retard boi?

link? (and not from a rw kool aid site kid)

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Ahh but it does. I understand your unwillingness to address it as it would destroy your narrative. Suppose those mails you referenced were only classified later as a result of a judicial order that would make them public years after her tenure at state. Is that a violation of any law? Context is everything unless you're not interested in the truth.

Of course you have a link.

Of course your house of cards just fell. How do you say what you do without knowing this? What do you suppose " not classified at the time" means? If the Secretary of State emails the president or his staff during routine duties, do you believe anyone would release those without classification and redaction? Remember, none of those emails, let alone all of them, were ever meant to be public.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

you have info the repub witch hunt couldn't find retard boi?

link? (and not from a rw kool aid site kid)

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Who is "they"? link?

That would be State and DOJ, have you been living under a freaking rock?

State has said that none were classified at the time.

 

[whitehall]

"Crush the Tea Party"? Wow , it seems that the democrat radicals still fear the good people who want to get the best candidates in the republican party. Lefties are so full of hatred that they make Tea Party activists look like innocent bystanders.

 

[OKTexas]

So you think it's cool to have a couple of thousand classified documents, some holding compartmented information, on an insecure server and it doesn't endanger national security? If you can in any way rationalize that then you're a lost cause.

A coulple of thousand? When, why and by whom were they classified? Context matters.

Actually context in the way you're asking doesn't matter, she had documents containing classified information on an insecure system, that alone constitutes a violation of law. As far as I know they haven't released exactly which agencies are doing the review, so it's impossible to answer who said they were classified. They have reported that about 140 of those documents were generated by the hildabitch herself. The law says it doesn't matter if it was done intentionally or by neglect, it's still a violation.

Ahh but it does. I understand your unwillingness to address it as it would destroy your narrative. Suppose those mails you referenced were only classified later as a result of a judicial order that would make them public years after her tenure at state. Is that a violation of any law? Context is everything unless you're not interested in the truth.

Of course you have a link.

Of course your house of cards just fell. How do you say what you do without knowing this? What do you suppose " not classified at the time" means? If the Secretary of State emails the president or his staff during routine duties, do you believe anyone would release those without classification and redaction? Remember, none of those emails, let alone all of them, were ever meant to be public.

Once again your ignorance is showing. Every work related email sent/received by every government official is require by law to be archived. Try taking a look at the Federal Records Keeping Act. In fact here's a little piece of it:

§ 3106. Unlawful removal, destruction of records

(a) FEDERAL AGENCY NOTIFICATION.—The head of each Federal agency shall notify the Archivist of any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, corruption, deletion, erasure, or other destruction of records in the custody of the agency, and with the assistance of the Archivist shall initiate action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records the head of the Federal agency knows or has reason to believe have been unlawfully removed from that agency, or from another Federal agency whose records have been transferred to the legal custody of that Federal agency.

(b) ARCHIVIST NOTIFICATION.—In any case in which the head of the Federal agency does not initiate an action for such recovery or other redress within a reasonable period of time after being notified of any such unlawful action described in subsection (a), or is participating in, or believed to be participating in any such unlawful action, the Archivist shall request the Attorney General to initiate such an action, and shall notify the Congress when such a request has been made.

Records Management by Federal Agencies (44 U.S.C. Chapter 31