No I didn't say that. Why would you twist my words like that? Be less dishonest, bro.That's a very skewed view. The left sees a stark difference between a fetus at 2 months and a child at 6 years. Obviously the latter has more value not just because they made it to 6 years and are together enough to be enrolled in school, but also because great investment has already been placed in them...to name just a few reasons why your perspective is bad. The left believes that investing in young people is the future, and not just our own children. It's a quality over quantity game. The right does not. The right thinks we should birth all of the delinquent drug addicted and alcoholic mother's children into a losing situation so they can be scapegoated for the rest of their lives. Trust me, it won't be Einsteins these women produce.
Ok so a baby is only worth something if it makes it to 6 years.
Now I'm starting to see how liberals think. It's a money thing. If you invest money in a baby, by golley, they have a right to live. If you don't, then get that tube out.