Where did I say anything about sending them our best? You really should not be drinking while posting!
Well, your post was certainly vague.
SO please tell us where Wikipedia says we were going to send them the USS Guam.
Because once again, Wikipedia says you are wrong.
President Ronald Reagan approved the Royal Navy's request to borrow a Sea Harrier-capable Iwo Jima-class amphibious assault ship (the US Navy had earmarked USS Guam (LPH-9) for this[184]) if the British lost an aircraft carrier. The United States Navy developed a plan to help the British man the ship with American military contractors, likely retired sailors with knowledge of the ship's systems.[185]
Falklands War - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Of course, I do not use Wikipedia as a reference myself, but whatever floats your boat. Where does WIkipedia say it was the USS Guam exactly?
I have probably forgotten more on this topic than a ground pounder ever knew. Don't call me ignorant! I was an electronics technician while enlisted and a fire control radar officer and my watch station was as a Missile Engagement Controller. I graduated from the TAO School just prior to the Gulf War. I was the only O-3 on my ship allowed to stand that watch, even though I was a propulsion engineer.
Now, lay your dick on the table so it can be smacked so hard that it might swell up to match a 5 year old.
And oh yes, drones have no problem with ECM. Never mind that even Iran was able to take over one of our drones, crash it in their territory, and recover it.
And our drones were so ineffective in many areas of Syria where Russian ECM made them unable to do their missions.
In a speech last month at the U.S. Geospatial Intelligence Foundation’s 2018 GEOINT Symposium, General Raymond Thomas, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, said Syria has become “the most aggressive E.W. environment on the planet.”
“They are testing us every day, knocking our communications down, disabling our EC-130s, etcetera,” he said. Even though the general did not directly say Moscow was behind the operations, according to experts, it is only Russia that has advanced capabilities to successfully carry out such interference in Syria.
Thomas’ comments came soon after reports that Russia has been blocking small U.S. surveillance drones from receiving GPS satellite signals.
One Russian system capable of such interference is the Krasukha-4. It is designed primarily to counter the radars of attack, reconnaissance and unmanned aircraft, and has reportedly been deployed to Syria. The truck-mounted radio emitter is capable of jamming not only radar signals, but also control channels for drones, making planes “blind and deaf.” It has a range of up to 300 km.
Signaling strength: Russia’s real Syria success is electronic warfare against the US
Syria has become Russia's “ultimate testing ground” for weapons, and Russian forces have been particularly successful at using electronic warfare technology to interfere with Coalition-led operations.
www.thedefensepost.com
So big deal you were a JG 30 years ago, this is 30 years later. I will just sit back now, as you have the biggest dick here. Happy?