Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, there's no such thing as a PhD in "research", you claimed she was a PhD researcher.
Either she has a PhD in some science, or you're a fibber.
So which is it?
Dear God, that really is some desperate, desperate stuff, Westwall!!
My wife is a paid researcher. She is writing her PhD. When she has completed her PhD, she will continue to be a paid reseacher.
I will accept an apology.
Ahhhh, you're a fibber! You expect me to apologise to you when you told an untrue statement? That's rich. BTW you don't "write your PhD" You might want to become more acquainted with the world of academia before you make a fool of yourself again.
And for the record ALL GRAD STUDENTS are paid researchers, they just aren't paid much.
Now run along fibber. You still havn't said what FIELD she is studying. Landscape engineering?
Dear God, that really is some desperate, desperate stuff, Westwall!!
My wife is a paid researcher. She is writing her PhD. When she has completed her PhD, she will continue to be a paid reseacher.
I will accept an apology.
Ahhhh, you're a fibber! You expect me to apologise to you when you told an untrue statement? That's rich. BTW you don't "write your PhD" You might want to become more acquainted with the world of academia before you make a fool of yourself again.
And for the record ALL GRAD STUDENTS are paid researchers, they just aren't paid much.
Now run along fibber. You still havn't said what FIELD she is studying. Landscape engineering?
Um....what ARE you talking about? What "fib" did I tell? What "untrue" statement do you see?
Seriously - I have absolutely no idea what you are ranting about here.
btw. Not all grad students receive funding or grants (at least not here). It's a very competitive field, and funding is often only for one year when it does come. There are not so many paid research positions here, but my wife is lucky to have one.
The idea that mankind can fundamentally redirect the climate of the Earth in the very brief time-span of a couple of hundreds of years is such obvious hubris it is really rather ridiculous. Unfortunately, it's the kind of hubris scientists are particularly prone to.
The idea that mankind can fundamentally redirect the climate of the Earth in the very brief time-span of a couple of hundreds of years is such obvious hubris it is really rather ridiculous. Unfortunately, it's the kind of hubris scientists are particularly prone to.
Possibly - but doing nothing while oceans rise to threaten the likes of London, LA and New York doesn't seem like a smart plan to me.
Every major business has a contingency plan for terror, sire, earthquake and flood.
Good governance in relation to climate change would surely be to follow suit.
Ahhhh, you're a fibber! You expect me to apologise to you when you told an untrue statement? That's rich. BTW you don't "write your PhD" You might want to become more acquainted with the world of academia before you make a fool of yourself again.
And for the record ALL GRAD STUDENTS are paid researchers, they just aren't paid much.
Now run along fibber. You still havn't said what FIELD she is studying. Landscape engineering?
Um....what ARE you talking about? What "fib" did I tell? What "untrue" statement do you see?
Seriously - I have absolutely no idea what you are ranting about here.
btw. Not all grad students receive funding or grants (at least not here). It's a very competitive field, and funding is often only for one year when it does come. There are not so many paid research positions here, but my wife is lucky to have one.
Your post number 10 in this very thread. You see, when you fib a lot you lose track of what lie you said, and to whom you said it.
"(My wife is a PhD researcher)"
That statement means (at least on the planet I live on) that your wife has a PhD in some science. And that she is working as a researcher for some company or institution of higher learning (you see dear boy I've done both, as has my wife) I then asked you to tell us what specific scientific field she is studying.
You then altered your original statement (after some prodding from me) to state that your wife was "writing" her PhD, (whatever the hell that means) and then expected an apology.
Here, on my planet that is called an untruth. You acted like all the AGW supporters and tried to bluff your way out of it and STILL havn't answered my original question which was what SPECIFIC scientific field is your wife studying. Just like the AGW "scientists" when asked to provide their raw data and original code so that other scientists can check their work.....which is an ESSENTIAL component of the SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
I suggest you look that up too. It seems you have a great deal to learn before you rejoin the conversation, so get to work.
And if you told your granny you could make a movie of yourself fucking a gurl in the ass and distribute it to 1 billion people in less than 5 minutes..........she'da had you committed.......which probably wouldn't have been all bad since you're apparently an idiot.The idea that mankind can fundamentally redirect the climate of the Earth in the very brief time-span of a couple of hundreds of years is such obvious hubris it is really rather ridiculous. Unfortunately, it's the kind of hubris scientists are particularly prone to.
Saigon lives in Europe. You may not realize that there are differences in higher education here. EU member countries are trying to harmonize the various systems through initiatives like the Bologna Accords but the differences between countries are still significant.
In the US PhD studies usually require passing classes covering broader subject areas before the student moves on to choose their research topic and their actual research. Some countries in Europe tend to be more focused on the research. Prior to even being admitted for PhD studies, a student will have gone through a lengthy process of vetting their research topic. Only when supervisors believe that there are sufficient grounds and the research is possible, is the student admitted for studies. There is no reason to believe that Saigon's claim regarding his wife is not legitimate.
Possibly - but doing nothing while oceans rise to threaten the likes of London, LA and New York doesn't seem like a smart plan to me.
Every major business has a contingency plan for terror, sire, earthquake and flood.
Good governance in relation to climate change would surely be to follow suit.
I'm all for preparing for floods, earthquackes, droughts, etc.
But that is very different from basing fundamental policy decisions on some hysterical fad.
...........dummy thinks there is no correlation with the science and politics!!!
Ive always found it fascinating that the far left can navigate the world in this perpetual state of naive.
They are intentionally naive like the kid who smacks his little sister on the head and then says he doesn't know why she's crying.
10 points for bluster - 0 for substance.
Then feel free to step up and explain WHY conservative parties around the world disagree with you.
Again - it is ONKY in the US and Australia that the issue is politicised - that we know. The question is WHY it is politicsed in the US.
The question has already been answered more than once.
Fair enough - give me a post # and I'll check it out.
All I've seen on this thread is people saying it's a money-driven left wing conspiracy - apparently supported by conservatives.
When Truthiepoo (a RABID leftwing kook) AGREES with conservatives in post #4 that it's the money, she kills your thread AND credibility in one shot.The question has already been answered more than once.
Fair enough - give me a post # and I'll check it out.
All I've seen on this thread is people saying it's a money-driven left wing conspiracy - apparently supported by conservatives.
When Truthiepoo (a RABID leftwing kook) AGREES with conservatives in post #4 that it's the money, she kills your thread AND credibility in one shot.The question has already been answered more than once.
Fair enough - give me a post # and I'll check it out.
All I've seen on this thread is people saying it's a money-driven left wing conspiracy - apparently supported by conservatives.
You've got an extra 90 posts of bluster and denial (by the chicken littles like you) after that intermingled with repetition of the same easily observable cause.
I dunno what's creepier. Her being on target on a subject... again... which is way to consistant for her, OR you ignoring it. Then again, you're new.
...........dummy thinks there is no correlation with the science and politics!!!
Ive always found it fascinating that the far left can navigate the world in this perpetual state of naive.
They are intentionally naive like the kid who smacks his little sister on the head and then says he doesn't know why she's crying.
10 points for bluster - 0 for substance.
Then feel free to step up and explain WHY conservative parties around the world disagree with you.
Again - it is ONKY in the US and Australia that the issue is politicised - that we know. The question is WHY it is politicsed in the US.