Why does this guy still have a license to practice law?

task0778

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2017
12,313
11,417
2,265
Texas hill country
As the U.S. government seeks prison time for a former FBI lawyer who admitted falsifying evidence to spy on a former Trump aide, the District of Columbia Bar association hasn’t begun an investigation to strip him of his law license, records show.


Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the D.C. Bar despite forging a document to win approval to spy on Page. The defendant, Kevin Eugene Clinesmith, is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the Democrat-controlled D.C. Bar, despite his having pleaded guilty more than five months ago to illegally altering a document used for authorization to electronically eavesdrop on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as part of the FBI’s Russiagate probe.

A search of the D.C. Bar’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel database of "disciplinary proceedings" turns up no such proceedings against Clinesmith, even though his guilty plea was reported to the bar and the bar's board has received at least one formal complaint demanding his disbarment.

“The only appropriate sanction for committing a serious felony that also interfered with the proper administration of justice and constituted misrepresentation, fraud and moral turpitude is disbarment,” the National Legal and Policy Center said in a complaint it filed with the bar on Sept. 10. “Anything less would minimize the seriousness of the misconduct.”

The 38-year-old Clinesmith, a registered Democrat who sent anti-Trump rants to FBI colleagues after the Republican was elected in 2016, awaits sentencing on Friday.

In arguing for leniency, lawyers for Clinesmith have told the court that their client “self-reported his conduct and his guilty plea to the authorities where he is licensed as an attorney. And he has voluntarily offered to stop practicing law until those disciplinary authorities complete their review of Kevin’s conduct.”

But Paul Kamenar, the National Legal and Policy Center counsel who drafted the ethics watchdog’s complaint, said Clinesmith appears to have violated a bar rule requiring him to report his crime within 10 days of his guilty plea in August.

Clinesmith was admitted to the D.C. bar in 2008 and the Michigan bar a year earlier, after he graduated from Michigan State University Law School.

Unlike the D.C. Bar, the State Bar of Michigan automatically suspended Clinesmith from practicing law in the state on Aug. 19, the day the court accepted his guilty plea.

However, a notice of the action was not posted on the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board website until Jan. 14. And the document does not come up under his name in the directory of all Michigan attorneys who have been the subject of disciplinary proceedings.

“That’s very strange,” a State Bar of Michigan spokeswoman said.

Still, "he is under disciplinary suspension,” she confirmed. "He is not in good standing.”
.
.
The D.C. Bar, with more than 100,000 members from across the country, did not respond to questions regarding why it hasn't started a disciplinary review. But a longstanding member of the bar suspects board members are “dragging their feet because of politics.”

“The District of Columbia is a very liberal bar,” he said. “Basically, the leaders of the bar are liberal Democrats and may want to go light on the guy because he’s also a Democrat who hated Trump.”

Last month, 25 former D.C. Bar presidents published a letter in the Washington Post attacking then-President Trump for filing “groundless” lawsuits in battleground states where poll workers had complained in sworn affidavits about witnessing voter fraud and ballot tampering in favor of Joe Biden. The bar officials, who included former Clinton ally Jamie Gorelick and close Biden confidant Mark Tuohey, claimed Trump “abuse[d] the judicial system to subvert the democratic process."



This guy pleaded guilty to a felony, and is automatically subject to being disciplined by the DC bar. 5 months, nothing happened. WTF? Anybody want to claim it wouldn't have been different if Clinesmith was a repub who altered a legal document for Trump? The guy would've been in prison by now.

Gee, he self-reported his felony and voluntarily stopped practicing law, what a guy. Probably right after he found out the DOJ was going to fry his ass anyway. The plain and simple truth is that if this kind of bullshit goes unpunished then we can expect future incidents of misconduct. If there no consequences and no penalty imposed, then there is no deterrence for future illegal acts.
 
As the U.S. government seeks prison time for a former FBI lawyer who admitted falsifying evidence to spy on a former Trump aide, the District of Columbia Bar association hasn’t begun an investigation to strip him of his law license, records show.


Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the D.C. Bar despite forging a document to win approval to spy on Page. The defendant, Kevin Eugene Clinesmith, is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the Democrat-controlled D.C. Bar, despite his having pleaded guilty more than five months ago to illegally altering a document used for authorization to electronically eavesdrop on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as part of the FBI’s Russiagate probe.

A search of the D.C. Bar’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel database of "disciplinary proceedings" turns up no such proceedings against Clinesmith, even though his guilty plea was reported to the bar and the bar's board has received at least one formal complaint demanding his disbarment.

“The only appropriate sanction for committing a serious felony that also interfered with the proper administration of justice and constituted misrepresentation, fraud and moral turpitude is disbarment,” the National Legal and Policy Center said in a complaint it filed with the bar on Sept. 10. “Anything less would minimize the seriousness of the misconduct.”

The 38-year-old Clinesmith, a registered Democrat who sent anti-Trump rants to FBI colleagues after the Republican was elected in 2016, awaits sentencing on Friday.

In arguing for leniency, lawyers for Clinesmith have told the court that their client “self-reported his conduct and his guilty plea to the authorities where he is licensed as an attorney. And he has voluntarily offered to stop practicing law until those disciplinary authorities complete their review of Kevin’s conduct.”

But Paul Kamenar, the National Legal and Policy Center counsel who drafted the ethics watchdog’s complaint, said Clinesmith appears to have violated a bar rule requiring him to report his crime within 10 days of his guilty plea in August.

Clinesmith was admitted to the D.C. bar in 2008 and the Michigan bar a year earlier, after he graduated from Michigan State University Law School.

Unlike the D.C. Bar, the State Bar of Michigan automatically suspended Clinesmith from practicing law in the state on Aug. 19, the day the court accepted his guilty plea.

However, a notice of the action was not posted on the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board website until Jan. 14. And the document does not come up under his name in the directory of all Michigan attorneys who have been the subject of disciplinary proceedings.

“That’s very strange,” a State Bar of Michigan spokeswoman said.

Still, "he is under disciplinary suspension,” she confirmed. "He is not in good standing.”
.
.
The D.C. Bar, with more than 100,000 members from across the country, did not respond to questions regarding why it hasn't started a disciplinary review. But a longstanding member of the bar suspects board members are “dragging their feet because of politics.”

“The District of Columbia is a very liberal bar,” he said. “Basically, the leaders of the bar are liberal Democrats and may want to go light on the guy because he’s also a Democrat who hated Trump.”

Last month, 25 former D.C. Bar presidents published a letter in the Washington Post attacking then-President Trump for filing “groundless” lawsuits in battleground states where poll workers had complained in sworn affidavits about witnessing voter fraud and ballot tampering in favor of Joe Biden. The bar officials, who included former Clinton ally Jamie Gorelick and close Biden confidant Mark Tuohey, claimed Trump “abuse[d] the judicial system to subvert the democratic process."



This guy pleaded guilty to a felony, and is automatically subject to being disciplined by the DC bar. 5 months, nothing happened. WTF? Anybody want to claim it wouldn't have been different if Clinesmith was a repub who altered a legal document for Trump? The guy would've been in prison by now.

Gee, he self-reported his felony and voluntarily stopped practicing law, what a guy. Probably right after he found out the DOJ was going to fry his ass anyway. The plain and simple truth is that if this kind of bullshit goes unpunished then we can expect future incidents of misconduct. If there no consequences and no penalty imposed, then there is no deterrence for future illegal acts.
You might want to try legitimate sources

that said, you said he resigned from the bar. What other authority do you delude yourself into thinking they have?

snowflake whiny trump troll

perpetual victims. Lol
 
As the U.S. government seeks prison time for a former FBI lawyer who admitted falsifying evidence to spy on a former Trump aide, the District of Columbia Bar association hasn’t begun an investigation to strip him of his law license, records show.


Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the D.C. Bar despite forging a document to win approval to spy on Page. The defendant, Kevin Eugene Clinesmith, is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the Democrat-controlled D.C. Bar, despite his having pleaded guilty more than five months ago to illegally altering a document used for authorization to electronically eavesdrop on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as part of the FBI’s Russiagate probe.

A search of the D.C. Bar’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel database of "disciplinary proceedings" turns up no such proceedings against Clinesmith, even though his guilty plea was reported to the bar and the bar's board has received at least one formal complaint demanding his disbarment.

“The only appropriate sanction for committing a serious felony that also interfered with the proper administration of justice and constituted misrepresentation, fraud and moral turpitude is disbarment,” the National Legal and Policy Center said in a complaint it filed with the bar on Sept. 10. “Anything less would minimize the seriousness of the misconduct.”

The 38-year-old Clinesmith, a registered Democrat who sent anti-Trump rants to FBI colleagues after the Republican was elected in 2016, awaits sentencing on Friday.

In arguing for leniency, lawyers for Clinesmith have told the court that their client “self-reported his conduct and his guilty plea to the authorities where he is licensed as an attorney. And he has voluntarily offered to stop practicing law until those disciplinary authorities complete their review of Kevin’s conduct.”

But Paul Kamenar, the National Legal and Policy Center counsel who drafted the ethics watchdog’s complaint, said Clinesmith appears to have violated a bar rule requiring him to report his crime within 10 days of his guilty plea in August.

Clinesmith was admitted to the D.C. bar in 2008 and the Michigan bar a year earlier, after he graduated from Michigan State University Law School.

Unlike the D.C. Bar, the State Bar of Michigan automatically suspended Clinesmith from practicing law in the state on Aug. 19, the day the court accepted his guilty plea.

However, a notice of the action was not posted on the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board website until Jan. 14. And the document does not come up under his name in the directory of all Michigan attorneys who have been the subject of disciplinary proceedings.

“That’s very strange,” a State Bar of Michigan spokeswoman said.

Still, "he is under disciplinary suspension,” she confirmed. "He is not in good standing.”
.
.
The D.C. Bar, with more than 100,000 members from across the country, did not respond to questions regarding why it hasn't started a disciplinary review. But a longstanding member of the bar suspects board members are “dragging their feet because of politics.”

“The District of Columbia is a very liberal bar,” he said. “Basically, the leaders of the bar are liberal Democrats and may want to go light on the guy because he’s also a Democrat who hated Trump.”

Last month, 25 former D.C. Bar presidents published a letter in the Washington Post attacking then-President Trump for filing “groundless” lawsuits in battleground states where poll workers had complained in sworn affidavits about witnessing voter fraud and ballot tampering in favor of Joe Biden. The bar officials, who included former Clinton ally Jamie Gorelick and close Biden confidant Mark Tuohey, claimed Trump “abuse[d] the judicial system to subvert the democratic process."



This guy pleaded guilty to a felony, and is automatically subject to being disciplined by the DC bar. 5 months, nothing happened. WTF? Anybody want to claim it wouldn't have been different if Clinesmith was a repub who altered a legal document for Trump? The guy would've been in prison by now.

Gee, he self-reported his felony and voluntarily stopped practicing law, what a guy. Probably right after he found out the DOJ was going to fry his ass anyway. The plain and simple truth is that if this kind of bullshit goes unpunished then we can expect future incidents of misconduct. If there no consequences and no penalty imposed, then there is no deterrence for future illegal acts.
You might want to try legitimate sources

that said, you said he resigned from the bar. What other authority do you delude yourself into thinking they have?

snowflake whiny trump troll

perpetual victims. Lol

You might want to try legitimate sources

-- realclearpolitics.com is a website that provides both sides of an issue. They are about as legit as you can get.

you said he resigned from the bar. What other authority do you delude yourself into thinking they have?

-- no, I didn't say that. The article said he voluntarily stopped practicing law. That ain't the same as resigning from the bar.

snowflake whiny trump troll

perpetual victims. Lol


-- Fuck off, bitch.
 
As the U.S. government seeks prison time for a former FBI lawyer who admitted falsifying evidence to spy on a former Trump aide, the District of Columbia Bar association hasn’t begun an investigation to strip him of his law license, records show.


Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the D.C. Bar despite forging a document to win approval to spy on Page. The defendant, Kevin Eugene Clinesmith, is still listed as an “active” attorney in “good standing” with the Democrat-controlled D.C. Bar, despite his having pleaded guilty more than five months ago to illegally altering a document used for authorization to electronically eavesdrop on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as part of the FBI’s Russiagate probe.

A search of the D.C. Bar’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel database of "disciplinary proceedings" turns up no such proceedings against Clinesmith, even though his guilty plea was reported to the bar and the bar's board has received at least one formal complaint demanding his disbarment.

“The only appropriate sanction for committing a serious felony that also interfered with the proper administration of justice and constituted misrepresentation, fraud and moral turpitude is disbarment,” the National Legal and Policy Center said in a complaint it filed with the bar on Sept. 10. “Anything less would minimize the seriousness of the misconduct.”

The 38-year-old Clinesmith, a registered Democrat who sent anti-Trump rants to FBI colleagues after the Republican was elected in 2016, awaits sentencing on Friday.

In arguing for leniency, lawyers for Clinesmith have told the court that their client “self-reported his conduct and his guilty plea to the authorities where he is licensed as an attorney. And he has voluntarily offered to stop practicing law until those disciplinary authorities complete their review of Kevin’s conduct.”

But Paul Kamenar, the National Legal and Policy Center counsel who drafted the ethics watchdog’s complaint, said Clinesmith appears to have violated a bar rule requiring him to report his crime within 10 days of his guilty plea in August.

Clinesmith was admitted to the D.C. bar in 2008 and the Michigan bar a year earlier, after he graduated from Michigan State University Law School.

Unlike the D.C. Bar, the State Bar of Michigan automatically suspended Clinesmith from practicing law in the state on Aug. 19, the day the court accepted his guilty plea.

However, a notice of the action was not posted on the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board website until Jan. 14. And the document does not come up under his name in the directory of all Michigan attorneys who have been the subject of disciplinary proceedings.

“That’s very strange,” a State Bar of Michigan spokeswoman said.

Still, "he is under disciplinary suspension,” she confirmed. "He is not in good standing.”
.
.
The D.C. Bar, with more than 100,000 members from across the country, did not respond to questions regarding why it hasn't started a disciplinary review. But a longstanding member of the bar suspects board members are “dragging their feet because of politics.”

“The District of Columbia is a very liberal bar,” he said. “Basically, the leaders of the bar are liberal Democrats and may want to go light on the guy because he’s also a Democrat who hated Trump.”

Last month, 25 former D.C. Bar presidents published a letter in the Washington Post attacking then-President Trump for filing “groundless” lawsuits in battleground states where poll workers had complained in sworn affidavits about witnessing voter fraud and ballot tampering in favor of Joe Biden. The bar officials, who included former Clinton ally Jamie Gorelick and close Biden confidant Mark Tuohey, claimed Trump “abuse[d] the judicial system to subvert the democratic process."



This guy pleaded guilty to a felony, and is automatically subject to being disciplined by the DC bar. 5 months, nothing happened. WTF? Anybody want to claim it wouldn't have been different if Clinesmith was a repub who altered a legal document for Trump? The guy would've been in prison by now.

Gee, he self-reported his felony and voluntarily stopped practicing law, what a guy. Probably right after he found out the DOJ was going to fry his ass anyway. The plain and simple truth is that if this kind of bullshit goes unpunished then we can expect future incidents of misconduct. If there no consequences and no penalty imposed, then there is no deterrence for future illegal acts.
Never any consequences!!!
 
The swamp creatures must be allowed to frame innocent people without hinder.

You’re next.

Another angle. Durham told this young man if he didn't spit up everything he knew, he would be an OLD MAN in prison. Think about it!!!.Someone told that little kid to do it. He is a STAR Witness. Maybe they should hide him in Siberia for awhile.

And this kid had all the symptoms possible of the dreaded disease ASDS, Arkansas Sudden Death Syndrome
 
The swamp creatures must be allowed to frame innocent people without hinder.

You’re next.

he changed three words in an email because he didn't want to be hassled to get another document from the CIA.

There was no vast conspiracy here... Carter Page was suspected because he did a lot of suspicious stuff.
 
The swamp creatures must be allowed to frame innocent people without hinder.

You’re next.

he changed three words in an email because he didn't want to be hassled to get another document from the CIA.

There was no vast conspiracy here... Carter Page was suspected because he did a lot of suspicious stuff.
That's laughable, Joey! He's a lawyer. He changed 3 words in an email because he knew that doing so totally changed the meaning of the document and hid the fact that Carter Page had been working with the government! Carter Page was "suspected" because of what that lawyer deliberately did!
 
The swamp creatures must be allowed to frame innocent people without hinder.

You’re next.

he changed three words in an email because he didn't want to be hassled to get another document from the CIA.

There was no vast conspiracy here... Carter Page was suspected because he did a lot of suspicious stuff.
That was written from the perspective of a 3rd grade mind for CS...He did a lot of suspicious stuff.....................What stuff!!!.lol
 
That's laughable, Joey! He's a lawyer. He changed 3 words in an email because he knew that doing so totally changed the meaning of the document and hid the fact that Carter Page had been working with the government! Carter Page was "suspected" because of what that lawyer deliberately did!

it was an extensive filing... three words in an email didn't change anything.

Carter Page was not working with the government at the time he was doing what he was doing with the Russians. That's the point.
 
That was written from the perspective of a 3rd grade mind for CS...He did a lot of suspicious stuff.....................What stuff!!!.lol


Trump announced Page as a foreign policy adviser in his campaign on March 21, 2016.[33] On September 23, 2016, Yahoo News reported U.S. intelligence officials investigated alleged contacts between Page and Russian officials subject to U.S. sanctions, including Igor Sechin, the president of state-run Russian oil conglomerate Rosneft.[4] Page promptly left the Trump campaign.[1][34] Upon his departure, Trump campaign communications director Jason Miller said of Page, "He’s never been a part of our campaign. Period." Another campaign spokesman, Steven Cheung, stated, "we are not aware of any of his activities, past or present." [35]

Shortly after Page left the Trump campaign, the Federal Bureau of Investigation obtained another warrant from the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in October 2016 to surveil Page's communications and read his saved emails.[36][37] To issue the warrant, a federal judge concluded there was probable cause to believe that Page was a foreign agent knowingly engaging in clandestine intelligence for the Russian government.[38] The initial 90-day warrant was subsequently renewed three times.[39] The New York Times reported on May 18, 2018, that the surveillance warrant expired around October 2017.[40] The FBI did not use a so-called "filter team" to prevent irrelevant information from being seen by investigators, and it was later determined that use of such a team is not required.[37]

On July 21, 2018, the Justice Department released a heavily redacted version of the October 2016 FISA warrant application for Page, which expressed in part the FBI's belief that the Russian government was collaborating with Page and possibly others associated with the Trump campaign,[53] as well as that Page had been the subject of targeted recruitment by Russian intelligence agencies.[54] The application also said that Page and a Russian intelligence operative had met in secret to discuss compromising material (kompromat) the Russian government held against "Candidate #2" (presumed to be Hillary Clinton) and the possibility of the Russians giving it to the Trump campaign.[55] Former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Joseph diGenova, who was under consideration to join Trump's legal team in 2018,[56] argued before and after release of the Mueller Report that the FISA warrants to surveil Page were obtained illegally.[citation needed] Other observers oppose diGenova's view, pointing out that the warrants were approved by four different judges, all of whom were appointed by Republican presidents.[57][58]
 
..what a big bunch of crap that was...of course the MSM won't admit they were huge jackasses --because they were the ones putting out all the crap
...the MSM needs to be taken out

Are you making a threat?
 
..what a big bunch of crap that was...of course the MSM won't admit they were huge jackasses --because they were the ones putting out all the crap
...the MSM needs to be taken out

Are you making a threat?
..HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHAHAHHA
protecting America is a threat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????
just like cops defending themselves is murder--hahahahhahahahahhaha
you people are ridiculous
 
..what a big bunch of crap that was...of course the MSM won't admit they were huge jackasses --because they were the ones putting out all the crap
...the MSM needs to be taken out

Are you making a threat?
..HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHAHAHHA
protecting America is a threat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????
just like cops defending themselves is murder--hahahahhahahahahhaha
you people are ridiculous

You said the MSM should be "taken out".. Do you just talk trash?
 

Forum List

Back
Top