SmarterThanHick
Senior Member
- Sep 14, 2009
- 2,084
- 241
- 48
So let's highlight the things you completely avoided in my last post, in your usual underhanded method, to avoid being shown wrong on simple topics:
So in summary once again: science is using transparent methods, defined terms, and reproducible verifiable evidence to draw logical conclusions. Religious nuts are using vague terms without real meaning, misdirected questions, circular reasoning, and unsupported guesses to draw their opinions.
So how do you pretend to claim similarity works for paternity tests or forensic science? You blatantly contradict yourself and then avoid responding to me pointing it out. You can't even support your own beliefs on this because they are so undeveloped.So you say they can prove a parent of a child through genes. But really they're just showing that they share identical copies of certain genes. That's all. It just shows similarity. Nothing more, nothing less. But you claim similarity can't prove ancestry. So how do you pretend to claim similarity works for paternity tests or forensic science?
Do you finally concede that evolution is temporally related to but does not involve the beginning of the universe or life? No, you'll avoid answering this one as well. Because you know you're wrong. Responding only leaves you conceding, or saying something else completely moronic you know I'll call you out on. You're best bet is misdirection once again, or completely ignoring it hoping it will go away.the relation between evolution and the beginning of the universe are related in that they both happened, but they aren't the same thing. You continue to pretend as if they are the same thing to make your usual morally bankrupt arguments. Or do you finally concede that evolution does not involve the beginning of the universe or life?
So in summary once again: science is using transparent methods, defined terms, and reproducible verifiable evidence to draw logical conclusions. Religious nuts are using vague terms without real meaning, misdirected questions, circular reasoning, and unsupported guesses to draw their opinions.