Why do progressive liberals fear Glenn Beck?

[kaz]

I don't make claims I can't back up; you did

Gotcha, when you don't answer a question, I should assume you can answer it, you just didn't. However, if I don't answer a question, that proves I can't.

Does anyone actually buy the stupid as shit rules you try to impose on these conversations or am I the only one laughing at you?

Yes to both.

Again, you want to whine about me not answering questions? Do it when you start answering questions. Like who is a liberal? To say there is an ideology you obviously don't follow and you can't name anyone who does is ridiculous,and if that's the way you want to play it, I'm going to play it, you don't get to bypass your non answer and demand I answer your questions. Stick it where the sun don't shine

I ain't the one "whining", dude/dudette. You did that with your assertion. Doesn't get much fuggin' whinier than "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal"

I merely gave you the opportunity to prove your statement ------ and you failed.
And that was three days ago.

Yet here you are still trolling for a "get out of lying free" card.
--- which is yet more

​

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

 

[Pogo]

I don't make claims I can't back up; you did

Gotcha, when you don't answer a question, I should assume you can answer it, you just didn't. However, if I don't answer a question, that proves I can't.

Does anyone actually buy the stupid as shit rules you try to impose on these conversations or am I the only one laughing at you?

Yes to both.

Again, you want to whine about me not answering questions? Do it when you start answering questions. Like who is a liberal? To say there is an ideology you obviously don't follow and you can't name anyone who does is ridiculous,and if that's the way you want to play it, I'm going to play it, you don't get to bypass your non answer and demand I answer your questions. Stick it where the sun don't shine

I ain't the one "whining", dude/dudette. You did that with your assertion. Doesn't get much fuggin' whinier than "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal"

I merely gave you the opportunity to prove your statement ------ and you failed.
And that was three days ago.

Yet here you are still trolling for a "get out of lying free" card.
--- which is yet more

​

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

You made the claim.
I didn't.
Guess who that leaves the onus, anus.

Deal with it.

 

[kaz]

I don't make claims I can't back up; you did

Gotcha, when you don't answer a question, I should assume you can answer it, you just didn't. However, if I don't answer a question, that proves I can't.

Does anyone actually buy the stupid as shit rules you try to impose on these conversations or am I the only one laughing at you?

Yes to both.

Again, you want to whine about me not answering questions? Do it when you start answering questions. Like who is a liberal? To say there is an ideology you obviously don't follow and you can't name anyone who does is ridiculous,and if that's the way you want to play it, I'm going to play it, you don't get to bypass your non answer and demand I answer your questions. Stick it where the sun don't shine

I ain't the one "whining", dude/dudette. You did that with your assertion. Doesn't get much fuggin' whinier than "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal"

I merely gave you the opportunity to prove your statement ------ and you failed.
And that was three days ago.

Yet here you are still trolling for a "get out of lying free" card.
--- which is yet more

​

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

You made the claim.
I didn't.
Guess who that leaves the onus, anus.

Deal with it.

Right, and you made the claims I challenge and you don't respond to. mirror.

Listen, boy, with me either answer questions or don't expect answers to questions unless I'm in the mood to answer them. In this case, I was actually making that point.

That is your choice. Like it or not, I don't give a shit. The choice is yours, but it isn't going away

 

[Pogo]

I don't make claims I can't back up; you did

Gotcha, when you don't answer a question, I should assume you can answer it, you just didn't. However, if I don't answer a question, that proves I can't.

Does anyone actually buy the stupid as shit rules you try to impose on these conversations or am I the only one laughing at you?

Yes to both.

Again, you want to whine about me not answering questions? Do it when you start answering questions. Like who is a liberal? To say there is an ideology you obviously don't follow and you can't name anyone who does is ridiculous,and if that's the way you want to play it, I'm going to play it, you don't get to bypass your non answer and demand I answer your questions. Stick it where the sun don't shine

I ain't the one "whining", dude/dudette. You did that with your assertion. Doesn't get much fuggin' whinier than "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal"

I merely gave you the opportunity to prove your statement ------ and you failed.
And that was three days ago.

Yet here you are still trolling for a "get out of lying free" card.
--- which is yet more

​

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

You made the claim.
I didn't.
Guess who that leaves the onus, anus.

Deal with it.

Right, and you made the claims I challenge and you don't respond to.

I made no claims that were not answered.

Go ahead. Post them.

Oh wait..... look who I'm talking to....

mirror.

Umm.. razor blade?

Listen, boy,

At least we know that. Speaking of questions you won't answer....

with me either answer questions or don't expect answers to questions unless I'm in the mood to answer them. In this case, I was actually making that point.

That is your choice. Like it or not, I don't give a shit. The choice is yours, but it isn't going away

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

 

[kaz]

Gotcha, when you don't answer a question, I should assume you can answer it, you just didn't. However, if I don't answer a question, that proves I can't.

Does anyone actually buy the stupid as shit rules you try to impose on these conversations or am I the only one laughing at you?

Yes to both.

Again, you want to whine about me not answering questions? Do it when you start answering questions. Like who is a liberal? To say there is an ideology you obviously don't follow and you can't name anyone who does is ridiculous,and if that's the way you want to play it, I'm going to play it, you don't get to bypass your non answer and demand I answer your questions. Stick it where the sun don't shine

I ain't the one "whining", dude/dudette. You did that with your assertion. Doesn't get much fuggin' whinier than "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal"

I merely gave you the opportunity to prove your statement ------ and you failed.
And that was three days ago.

Yet here you are still trolling for a "get out of lying free" card.
--- which is yet more

​

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

You made the claim.
I didn't.
Guess who that leaves the onus, anus.

Deal with it.

Right, and you made the claims I challenge and you don't respond to.

I made no claims that were not answered.

Go ahead. Post them.

Oh wait..... look who I'm talking to....

mirror.

Umm.. razor blade?

Listen, boy,

At least we know that. Speaking of questions you won't answer....

with me either answer questions or don't expect answers to questions unless I'm in the mood to answer them. In this case, I was actually making that point.

That is your choice. Like it or not, I don't give a shit. The choice is yours, but it isn't going away

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

 

[American_Jihad]

It's the weekend and time to get liberal heads to explode...

Glenn figures out what Bernie Sanders’ appeal is – and it’s not socialism by Ted
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2015

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2015/10/14/glenn-figures-out-what-bernie-sanders-appeal-is-and-its-not-socialism/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

 

[Pogo]

Yes to both.

I ain't the one "whining", dude/dudette. You did that with your assertion. Doesn't get much fuggin' whinier than "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal"

I merely gave you the opportunity to prove your statement ------ and you failed.
And that was three days ago.

Yet here you are still trolling for a "get out of lying free" card.
--- which is yet more

​

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

You made the claim.
I didn't.
Guess who that leaves the onus, anus.

Deal with it.

Right, and you made the claims I challenge and you don't respond to.

I made no claims that were not answered.

Go ahead. Post them.

Oh wait..... look who I'm talking to....

mirror.

Umm.. razor blade?

Listen, boy,

At least we know that. Speaking of questions you won't answer....

with me either answer questions or don't expect answers to questions unless I'm in the mood to answer them. In this case, I was actually making that point.

That is your choice. Like it or not, I don't give a shit. The choice is yours, but it isn't going away

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

You just reposted my post verbatim, idiot.

Let's make it six days.

 

[Pogo]

It's the weekend and time to get liberal heads to explode...

Glenn figures out what Bernie Sanders’ appeal is – and it’s not socialism by Ted
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2015

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2015/10/14/glenn-figures-out-what-bernie-sanders-appeal-is-and-its-not-socialism/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

I actually played the clip, since you didn't bother to summarize, Jizzhat.

It's a worthy analysis of communication dynamics. A good point, which he apparently thought so important that it was worth phoning in via cellphone from a bathroom stall. He kinda goes off the deep end with the God shit but he's basically on the mark as far as "connecting" as he puts it.

Why would that make anybody's head explode?

I don't get that part.

What makes my head explode is androgynous trolls who yap at my heels going "you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal" and when I ask "like who?" they go "humma humma humma" for a whole week instead of running away. But we each have our stalkers I guess.

 

[kaz]

Wrong, I'm definitely not the only one laughing at you. And yeah, when you stamp your feet and demand I do something, answer questions, that you do not do, then its "whining."

You made the claim.
I didn't.
Guess who that leaves the onus, anus.

Deal with it.

Right, and you made the claims I challenge and you don't respond to.

I made no claims that were not answered.

Go ahead. Post them.

Oh wait..... look who I'm talking to....

mirror.

Umm.. razor blade?

Listen, boy,

At least we know that. Speaking of questions you won't answer....

with me either answer questions or don't expect answers to questions unless I'm in the mood to answer them. In this case, I was actually making that point.

That is your choice. Like it or not, I don't give a shit. The choice is yours, but it isn't going away

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

Actually the choice was always yours. You chose to make a specific claim, and were invited to document it.

You failed. Because none exist, because the claim was spurious in the first place.
And you can't admit it. You actually think you get a pass. And you keep doubling, tripling, quadrupling down. Four days.

THAT is what isn't going away.

You just reposted my post verbatim, idiot.

Let's make it six days.

Right, I was making a point, idiot. I'm not interested in your double standard where you ignore my questions or give me meaningless drivel yet you whine and scream and stomp your feet and demand I answer yours.

You have to pick we both answer questions or neither of us do. Unlike me, you have a choice because I'll do either way. You don't answer my questions, I don't have one.

 

[Pogo]

Right, I was making a point, idiot.

Right, a point that you CANNOT DOCUMENT ..... BECAUSE NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXISTS. That makes it a lie, something you pulled out of your ass. Your inability to back up your own claim proves that.

This ain't rocket surgery. You lied, you got busted, and here you are whining about it a week later.
How smart is that?

Androgyne up already. You lied. Admit it and move the fuck on.

 

[kaz]

Right, I was making a point, idiot.

Right, a point that you CANNOT DOCUMENT ..... BECAUSE NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXISTS. That makes it a lie, something you pulled out of your ass. Your inability to back up your own claim proves that.

This ain't rocket surgery. You lied, you got busted, and here you are whining about it a week later.
How smart is that?

Androgyne up already. You lied. Admit it and move the fuck on.

You take your own crap wwwwwwaaayyyyyyy too seriously

 

[Pogo]

I take dishonest hacks seriously -- enough to grind them into a pulp.

As for you, you call yourself a liberal while you support authoritarian leftists who do zero that is liberal

I do huh?

Like who?

Yet you go on, not only unable to admit your own lie but actually calling attention to it.
A WEEK LATER.

SMH...

 

[American_Jihad]

It's that time again, liberals get yo plastic bags and duct tape ready... lol

Glenn Beck, wife to receive award at gala in Plano

Multimedia personality Glenn Beck and his wife, Tania, will be recipients of the 2015 Heroes of Hope Award at the Evening of Hope Gala on Nov. 7 at the Hilton Granite Park in Plano.

[email protected]
Community columnist

Published: 23 October 2015 09:56 AM

Multimedia personality Glenn Beck and his wife, Tania, will be recipients of the 2015 Heroes of Hope Award at the Evening of Hope Gala on Nov. 7 at the Hilton Granite Park in Plano.

Proceeds will benefit Hope’s Door, now in its 29th year of providing intervention and prevention services to those affected by domestic violence and community education programs.

The Becks were honorary chairs of last year’s gala, which raised a record $400,000 after he spoke on his radio show about witnessing domestic violence first-hand as child and the toll it took on his family. At the gala, he encouraged continued support for Hope’s Door, which “gives hope for a future to so many” and “can truly make a difference in people’s lives.”
...

Glenn Beck, wife to receive award at gala in Plano

 

[American_Jihad]

Liberals get yo duct tape and plastic bags ready, it's Saturday Night Live...
...

Exclusive: After CNBC Debate Backlash, GOP Campaign Official Claims Candidates Are Floating Glenn Beck as Possible Alternative Moderator
Oct. 30, 2015 4:12pm Jon Street

An official for a Republican presidential campaign claims that a number of Republican presidential candidates will convene a conference call Friday night to discuss the RNC’s role in future primary debates, as well as other options for debate moderators.

Among the names likely to be proposed is Glenn Beck, the official said.

The revelation came hours after the Republican National Committee announced it was suspending ties with NBC News to host the February 2016 primary debate. RNC chairman Reince Priebus sent a letter to NBC News expressing disapproval over how CNBC handled Wednesday’s debate in Boulder, Colorado.

Debate moderator moderator John Harwood asks a question during the CNBC Republican presidential debate at the University of Colorado, Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2015, in Boulder, Colo. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

“Right now, I know that his name is being mentioned,” the GOP campaign official told TheBlaze, referring to Beck.

The official claimed officials from at least three campaigns, Donald Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz and Gov. Jim Gilmore – are likely to support Beck as a possible debate moderator. The official said that Beck’s name will be mentioned because he is a “fair reviewer” and is liked “in and out of the Tea Party.”

...

Exclusive: After CNBC Debate Backlash, GOP Campaign Official Claims Candidates Are Floating Glenn Beck as Possible Alternative Moderator

 

[American_Jihad]

Glenn on ISIS: This is the greatest evil we have seen since the 1930s
by Meghan Wednesday Aug 13, 2014

...

When you look at the map of ISIS presence and control, it paints an even more frightening picture:

“They’re all over – with control in parts of Jordan, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Iran,” Glenn said. “That’s not some little thing. That is the beginning of the caliphate… And there’s more of this coming.

Glenn found himself particularly frustrated by what feels like a lack of urgency or even understanding from the Obama Administration.

As Media Matters has pointed out time and time again, Glenn began talking about the threat of a caliphate several years ago. In 2011, the George Soros-funded group criticized Glenn for talking about the topic. All the while, on June 29, 2011, now-CIA director John Brennan had this to say about the caliphate:

“Our strategy is … shaped by a deeper understanding of al Qaeda’s goals, strategy, and tactics. I’m not talking about al Qaeda’s grandiose vision of global domination through a violent Islamic caliphate. That vision is absurd, and we are not going to organize our counterterrorism policies against a feckless delusion that is never going to happen. We are not going to elevate these thugs and their murderous aspirations into something larger than they are.”

“Nobody in Congress is saying, ‘Hey, John Brennan said this. He was so wrong… and our intelligence community was this wrong,’” Glenn concluded. “And I got news for you: There’s no way our intelligence community didn’t know this. I know people who were former intelligence… They are not dummies… You could see these things coming on the horizon for a million miles. [So] why did we purposefully choose to close our eyes to a caliphate?”

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2014/08/13/glenn-on-isis-this-is-the-greatest-evil-we-have-seen-since-the-1930s/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

 

[American_Jihad]

‘We Need to Start Calling It That’: Glenn Beck Voices Harsh Words for the Black Lives Matter Movement
Nov. 20, 2015 3:57pm
Tré Goins-Phillips

Glenn Beck equated the Black Lives Matter movement to a “terrorist attack” Friday on The Glenn Beck Radio Program, saying, “Show me where I’m wrong.”

Beck said he believes the Black Lives Matter movement is applying the same methodology used during terrorism — but without the guns.

“What is the point of terrorism?” Beck said. “It is to get you to change to be so afraid that you change your behavior and you do as they want you to do. So while they haven’t used guns, they are using intimidation and threats of violence and shouting you down, blackballing you — whatever it takes.”

Beck’s comments were sparked by discussion over Black Lives Matter protesters’ recent invasion of a Dartmouth College library, where the activists harassed white students, calling one girl a “filthy white bitch.”

“They are terrorizing you,” Beck said of the incident. “What do you think that is when — when one of the girls, who supported Black Lives Matter at Dartmouth. And she was in the library, and she was studying. And they pulled her out of her seat. … She started crying.”

...

‘We Need to Start Calling It That’: Glenn Beck Voices Harsh Words for the Black Lives Matter Movement

 

[American_Jihad]

I love these GB threads, it bring all the liberal ilk together for us to see...

Glenn Beck Reluctantly Claims His Prediction Is Coming True: ‘I Wish We Would Have Been Wrong…but We’re Not’
Nov. 24, 2015 2:20pm
Tré Goins-Phillips

Glenn Beck discusses his prediction of a coming World War during “The Glenn Beck Radio Program” Nov. 24.

Beck insisted people should listen for a country in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to invoke Article Five. The radio host believes the invocation of the policy “brings us to war.”

“If anybody is talking about Article [Five] — and this could be brought up by France. I don’t think it will be brought up by Turkey, but it could be,” Beck said. “If anybody starts talking about Article [Five], that is the article in the NATO alliance that brings us all to war.”

The policy Beck is talking about unites all NATO allies against a singular threat.

“This principle is enshrined in Article Five of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states that an attack on one ally shall be considered an attack on all allies,” the NATO’s website reads.

The only other time Article Five has been invoked was in the wake of the attacks on 9/11, according to NATO.

Invoking Article Four, which calls together all NATO members for an emergency meeting, the countries in the Organization met Tuesday at 11 a.m. Eastern time after Turkey shot down a Russian fighter jet. Article Five was not invoked during that meeting.

Later in the program, Beck backed up his claim that war is coming. He described President Barack Obama as the “architect behind what is happening right now” in the Middle East, a marked change from his appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Kelly File” two weeks ago.

[iframe name="google_ads_iframe_/75484061/TheBlaze.com/Stories_3" width="300" height="250" id="google_ads_iframe_/75484061/TheBlaze.com/Stories_3" src="javascript:"[/iframe]
“Let me make the case that I was wrong when I was on [the "Kelly File"] and I gave him the benefit of the doubt and I said, ‘This president has been wrong every step of the way,’” Beck told his radio audience.

Beck went on to share a recently declassified Department of Defense document that seems to suggest the Obama administration knew about the potential for a radicalized group like the Islamic State, but allowed it to flourish in hopes that it would topple Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

The Defense Department paper is from 2012, months before Election Day.

“The election was nearing,” Beck said. “[A]nd they were in the midst of a horrible PR disaster, trying to appear strong on terror as terrorism was surging.”

The document describes a strong potential for a Salafist, or orthodox Sunni Islamic, movement to arise in Syria. The Islamic State had not yet declared its desired “caliphate,” but Beck said the intelligence community was “spot on.”

“If the situation unravels, there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime,” the Defense document reads.

According to Beck, the Obama administration allowed the Islamic State to grow because “this president wanted an extremist Islamic group fighting Assad.”


...

Glenn Beck Reluctantly Claims His Prediction Is Coming True: ‘I Wish We Would Have Been Wrong…but We’re Not’

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

His radio show is funny.. his TV show is just plain weird... I can't watch it.

 

[American_Jihad]

Liberals get yo duct tape and plastic bags ready, it's Saturday Night Live...


Beck on Obama’s Terror Priorities: ‘Whose Side Is He Really Trying to Protect? Us or Them?’
by Josh Feldman | 7:31 pm, December 4th

Glenn Beck got so frustrated today about President Obama‘s terrorism strategy that he just straight-up asked if the president is more interested in protecting the other side.

Beck posted a Facebook message saying that yes, despite Obama’s mockery, Americans should be concerned about widows and orphans due to potential ties to Islamic radicals. He said, “In the Middle East women play a huge role in the radicalization of men.”

...

And Beck asked a very provocative question in both forums after bringing up how Obama is “bringing more [refugees] in, excusing their killing, ignoring our border at best and refusing to bomb Isis strong holds.”

He asked, “Who’s [sic] side is he really trying to protect? Us or them?”

Beck on Obama’s Terror Priorities: ‘Whose Side Is He Really Trying to Protect? Us or Them?’

 

[Lakhota]

Glenn who?