TakeAStepBack
Gold Member
- Mar 29, 2011
- 13,935
- 1,742
- 245
it's so much easier to fool a man than to get him to believe he has been fooled.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not crickets! Obama lost the left over a year and a half ago. I personally withdrew my support for his policies about 18 months ago when it was clear that he was going to continue the neocon foreign policy agenda; not close GITMO; not investigate the former Administration for war crimes; not stop the wars; not fight for the public option in the healthcare bill; and a whole list of other things he's doing that are not leftist policies.And presumably, you support Barack Obama. That's where I don't get the LOLberals. When Bush was writing up shit like the patriot act, the howling and moaning from the lolberals was loud and boisterous. I know, because i sided with them over it.
But, now it really is just a side issue. It's a passing "I'm against it" now that Obama extended the act and even added new civil liberty erosions like NDAA2012.
That's the part i dont get. Bush and his wars and his civil liberties erosions and oh the HUGE Maniti. But it's crickets and the occassional "I'm against those things" when it is brought into question now that Obama is the one dishing out the unconstitutional wars, etc...
The American people voted for FDR four times, count em, four times, and that record may last for as long as America lasts. This historians have always rated FDR in the top three presidents and in the last poll rated FDR first, top American president, none better. So both the people recognized a great president and so have the historians. But that has been a thorn in conservative and Repubublican behinds ever since, so Republicans have created histories and had other experts that disagree with the American people and the noted historians, but to no avail. In a 1982 poll of conservatives, the conservatives rated FDR third best president behind Lincoln and Washington.
The Republicans trotted out their biggest gun against FDR, calling Social Security, communistic and even that didn't change things.
The American people voted for FDR four times, count em, four times, and that record may last for as long as America lasts. This historians have always rated FDR in the top three presidents and in the last poll rated FDR first, top American president, none better. So both the people recognized a great president and so have the historians. But that has been a thorn in conservative and Repubublican behinds ever since, so Republicans have created histories and had other experts that disagree with the American people and the noted historians, but to no avail. In a 1982 poll of conservatives, the conservatives rated FDR third best president behind Lincoln and Washington.
The Republicans trotted out their biggest gun against FDR, calling Social Security, communistic and even that didn't change things.
You may have heard about term limits, which explains your bold prediction.
The myth was enhanced in the 50's. We were in a cold war. Civic studies was a required course and we needed heroes as role models. FDR couldn't have been luckier in terms of timing.
The American people voted for FDR four times, count em, four times, and that record may last for as long as America lasts. This historians have always rated FDR in the top three presidents and in the last poll rated FDR first, top American president, none better. So both the people recognized a great president and so have the historians. But that has been a thorn in conservative and Repubublican behinds ever since, so Republicans have created histories and had other experts that disagree with the American people and the noted historians, but to no avail. In a 1982 poll of conservatives, the conservatives rated FDR third best president behind Lincoln and Washington.
The Republicans trotted out their biggest gun against FDR, calling Social Security, communistic and even that didn't change things.
You may have heard about term limits, which explains your bold prediction.
The myth was enhanced in the 50's. We were in a cold war. Civic studies was a required course and we needed heroes as role models. FDR couldn't have been luckier in terms of timing.
What myth?
The first poll of historians took place in 1948 and FDR was rated third best.
The first thing Republicans did when they got in power after the war was to amend the Constitution so that no one could run for a third term. That gave FDR a lock on that record, and the Republicans gave FDR that lock.
Plenty of newspapers were against FDR, as were some radio pundits. Father Coughlin, the Limbaugh of his time, lambasted FDR and his policies. There were many others, FDR did not have a free ride during those years, from corporations or business.
In the Fifties America elected Ike as president, a war hero so where's the myth?
Once you sever the lines of communication, war begins soon after.
What the hell does that mean? Care to explain that one in more detail? What liberals, what powers and with what guns?Liberals with the power of guns .
Give me 3 examples of liberals forcing their views on you.[/QUOTE]are forcing us all to follow their views and values.
Liberals all think rape jokes are funny.
I don't see there is any evidence of that at a theoertical level.
Some of the world's most succesful governments have been liberal.
In fact, I think you'd struggle to mount a case that conservatives have a better economi record in government that liberals. In any country.
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."
I'll give you a hint. No budget in almost four years. The ones offered by Obama were shot down unanimously. And that is just a taste of this administrations failure in the fiscal/economic realm.
Their economic theory's are destructive.
No dunce, what's destructive is RW voodoo economics of "trickle down"
That is the Democrats spin on it.
Republicans have always had the economic theory from the bottom up not from the top down.
Trickle down is a lie. Pushed heavily by the main stream media and liberal journalists.
Take a good look at our history and Repubs have always gotten the poor to become the middle class and the middle class to become the upper middle class and helps any American who wants to strive to become rich can achieve that goal.
A good example to look at is, President Calvin Coolidge policies, who accomplished this.
However, the progressive LOLberals just took away my right to due process. How is that for taking my freedom?
Why do people hate liberals?
The one thing about this board that most baffles me is the incredible depth of hatred and contempt for liberals.
The amount of comments from people suggesting all liberals are stupid, anti-patriotic, dumb...you name it. One even suggested liberals don't know what paragraphs are.
I don't get it. And I don't see anything the like the contempt expressed by liberals towards conservatives.
Firstly, the term "liberal" could be used to describe about half of the planet. Like "leftist", it's a fairly cliched catch-all adjective that have little real meaning. It's just too general to be much use.
Secondly, I've met extremely intelligent people from right across the political spectrum - and as many idiots. I've talked to brilliant facists, idiotic conservatives, intelligent communists and brain-dead centrists. I don't see a pattern there at all.
And lastly, why hate liberals when many of the most successful and celebrated administrations have been liberal ones? Were the governments if Clinton, Wilson, FDR, JFK and Truman really so much worse than conservative governments of similar eras?
The constant attacks on liberals seems to me (as an outsider) just a sign of incredible arrogance and conceit - and I would consider attacks on conservatives the same way.
If there is a REAL reason, with facts, for hating liberals - let's hear about it.
Because right wingers are idiots. You heard what that Texas right wing judge said today? He said the UN would invade Lubbock under Obamas permission to rebel against a civil war.