Why Co2 Can Not Cause Further Warming...

[Billy_Bob]

So global warming slows chemical reactions now? Tell us more about the magic.

What I'll tell you is that your comprehension of basic English needs some serious work.

Circk, Had you read the paper you would have found that there are many systems which buffer the CO2. Again you only see what you want and discard that which removes you from having even one valid point.

The paper clearly shows that the speed of buffering will offset and maintain the PH within a very narrow margin..

SO not only is it not a problem for the atmosphere it is not a problem for the oceans... I wonder what will be the next big lie and emergency demanding we deprive ourselves of cheep reliable energy? I'm sure the left wit control mongers will lie up something new...

 

[Old Rocks]

Billy Boob, you are a proven liar. Coleman has no scientific degree at all. Why should any of us give any credibility to anything further that you post?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Billy Boob, you are a proven liar. Coleman has no scientific degree at all. Why should any of us give any credibility to anything further that you post?

 

[Old Rocks]

And you still have no credibility. Liar.

 

[mamooth]

Had you read the paper you would have found that there are many systems which buffer the CO2.

Paper? What paper?

On this thread, you've only referenced a couple whackadoodle denier blog articles and Harde's pay-to-publish nonsense. None of them mentioned ocean chemistry or sodium bicarbonate.

I'd ask you to link to this "paper", except everyone already knows it doesn't actually exist. You know, same as with all your sources.

(Granted, your ass does exist, but that's not what we mean by "source".)

 

[jc456]

So did you never go to school or did you simply flunk everything?

Sure I did and I actually learned how to think for myself based on the knowledge I received. I think logically as I stated awhile ago. I don't merely take someone's word for something. I actually do research. Even if I'm not in that field. See responsible folks do research. One doesn't need to be a specialist to comment. That's why I can watch sports, comment on a game without having actually played the sport. You have little intelligence if you don't believe someone can't comment on something without being an expert. That's acting foolish.

Just Crazy, I have yet to see any evidence that you have ever researched anything that you post on. Sad, but true.

What is it you'd like to see? See I've been waiting on that experiment that shows what 120 PPM of CO2 added does to temperature and climate. so before you write, you should go look in the mirror. Oh wait, you might scare yourself straight if you did that. anyway. You have shown absolutely zero dude. that means again you're still LoSiNg

 

[jc456]

Had you read the paper you would have found that there are many systems which buffer the CO2.

Paper? What paper?

On this thread, you've only referenced a couple whackadoodle denier blog articles and Harde's pay-to-publish nonsense. None of them mentioned ocean chemistry or sodium bicarbonate.

I'd ask you to link to this "paper", except everyone already knows it doesn't actually exist. You know, same as with all your sources.

(Granted, your ass does exist, but that's not what we mean by "source".)

peer review from your side is just plain.....caca

 

[Billy_Bob]

Had you read the paper you would have found that there are many systems which buffer the CO2.

Paper? What paper?

On this thread, you've only referenced a couple whackadoodle denier blog articles and Harde's pay-to-publish nonsense. None of them mentioned ocean chemistry or sodium bicarbonate.

I'd ask you to link to this "paper", except everyone already knows it doesn't actually exist. You know, same as with all your sources.

(Granted, your ass does exist, but that's not what we mean by "source".)

So your incapable of reading too.. Old Crock citred "HOTWHOPPER" a left wit fantasy hack site who was defaming a real paper on WUWT. The **** who owns and operates Hot Whopper is a left wit drone who couldn't see a scientific thing if it hit her in the face. The dishonesty from the left is stunning...

 

[mamooth]

The slut who owns and operates Hot Whopper

BIlly, you ought to apologize to the board for being such a sexist bigot. Vile slurs such as you like to use are only appropriate in The Flame Zone.

 

[Billy_Bob]

BIlly, you ought to apologize to the board for being such a sexist bigot. Vile slurs such as you like to use are only appropriate in The Flame Zone.

No, I will not. That woman (and i use that term very begrudgingly) defames people and uses not a lick of common sense. She is disgusting. I have modified my comment only to maskout the original word, even thought you have copied and quoted it.. Vile slurs....... like the term DENIER that YOU USE ALL THE TIME! that is one of the most vile and hate driven terms anyone can use.... Yet you warmist use it incessantly.. I do not deny the holocaust or the millions who died, yet you attempt to defame me with your vile term..


ANd you still refuse to use even one brain cell or read... just looking for your next use of that hate driven word....

 

[Crick]

I'm having a real hard time thinking of ANY manner in which ANYONE benefits from your presence here Billy Bob.

 

[IanC]

Sou is fully within her rights to be a dimwitted leftist shrew who spouts ad homs and misinterprets data, while ignoring reality.

 

[mamooth]

"Shrew"?

Apparently, ugly sexism is now standard for all deniers.

Ian, hanging around WUWT has infected you with soul-rot. You need to separate yourself from that crowd, before you end up indistinguishable from Billy.

 

[jc456]

"Shrew"?

Apparently, ugly sexism is now standard for all deniers.

Ian, hanging around WUWT has infected you with soul-rot. You need to separate yourself from that crowd, before you end up indistinguishable from Billy.

BTW, wht is your definition of a denier?

 

[jc456]

"Shrew"?

Apparently, ugly sexism is now standard for all deniers.

Ian, hanging around WUWT has infected you with soul-rot. You need to separate yourself from that crowd, before you end up indistinguishable from Billy.

here let me help you out:

From Wikipedia, your favorite source of knowledge.

• Denier (unit), a unit of linear mass density of fibers

 

[Crick]

Circk, Had you read the paper you would have found that there are many systems which buffer the CO2. Again you only see what you want and discard that which removes you from having even one valid point.

The paper clearly shows that the speed of buffering will offset and maintain the PH within a very narrow margin..

SO not only is it not a problem for the atmosphere it is not a problem for the oceans... I wonder what will be the next big lie and emergency demanding we deprive ourselves of cheep reliable energy? I'm sure the left wit control mongers will lie up something new...

Bullshit.

Past constraints on the vulnerability of marine calcifiers to massive carbon dioxide release Abstract Nature Geoscience

Past constraints on the vulnerability of marine calcifiers to massive carbon dioxide release
Andy Ridgwell1 & Daniela N. Schmidt2

Increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide in sea water are driving a progressive acidification of the ocean1. Although the associated changes in the carbonate chemistry of surface and deep waters may adversely affect marine calcifying organisms2, 3, 4, current experiments do not always produce consistent results for a given species5. Ocean sediments record past biological responses to transient greenhouse warming and ocean acidification. During the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum, for example, the biodiversity of benthic calcifying organisms decreased markedly6, 7, whereas extinctions of surface dwellers were very limited8, 9. Here we use the Earth system model GENIE-1 to simulate and compare directly past and present environmental changes in the marine realm. In our simulation of future ocean conditions, we find an undersaturation with respect to carbonate in the deep ocean that exceeds that experienced during the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum and could endanger calcifying organisms. Furthermore, our simulations show higher rates of environmental change at the surface for the future than the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum, which could potentially challenge the ability of plankton to adapt.

Projecting Coral Reef Futures Under Global Warming and Ocean Acidification

Projecting Coral Reef Futures Under Global Warming and Ocean Acidification

1. John M. Pandolfi1,2,*,
2. Sean R. Connolly3,
3. Dustin J. Marshall2,
4. Anne L. Cohen4

+Author Affiliations

1. ↵*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

• ABSTRACT

Many physiological responses in present-day coral reefs to climate change are interpreted as consistent with the imminent disappearance of modern reefs globally because of annual mass bleaching events, carbonate dissolution, and insufficient time for substantial evolutionary responses. Emerging evidence for variability in the coral calcification response to acidification, geographical variation in bleaching susceptibility and recovery, responses to past climate change, and potential rates of adaptation to rapid warming supports an alternative scenario in which reef degradation occurs with greater temporal and spatial heterogeneity than current projections suggest. Reducing uncertainty in projecting coral reef futures requires improved understanding of past responses to rapid climate change; physiological responses to interacting factors, such as temperature, acidification, and nutrients; and the costs and constraints imposed by acclimation and adaptation.

Shelf and open-ocean calcareous phytoplankton assemblages across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum Implications for global productivity gradients

Shelf and open-ocean calcareous phytoplankton assemblages across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: Implications for global productivity gradients

1. Samantha J. Gibbs*1,
2. Timothy J. Bralower1,
3. Paul R. Bown2,
4. James C. Zachos3and
5. Laurel M. Bybell4

+Author Affiliations

1. 1Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
2. 2Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
3. 3Earth Science Department, University of California–Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
4. 4U.S. Geological Survey, 926 National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA

Abstract
Abrupt global warming and profound perturbation of the carbon cycle during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, ca. 55 Ma) have been linked to a massive release of carbon into the ocean-atmosphere system. Increased phytoplankton productivity has been invoked to cause subsequent CO2 drawdown, cooling, and environmental recovery. However, interpretations of geochemical and biotic data differ on when and where this increased productivity occurred. Here we present high-resolution nannofossil assemblage data from a shelf section (the U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] drill hole at Wilson Lake, New Jersey) and an open-ocean location (Ocean Drilling Program [ODP] Site 1209, paleoequatorial Pacific). These data combined with published biotic records indicate a transient steepening of shelf-offshelf trophic gradients across the PETM onset and peak, with a decrease in open-ocean productivity coeval with increased nutrient availability in shelf areas. Productivity levels recovered in the open ocean during the later stages of the event, which, coupled with intensified continental weathering rates, may have played an important role in carbon sequestration and CO2 drawdown.

Enhanced terrestrial weathering runoff and surface ocean carbonate production during the recovery stages of the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum - Kelly - 2005 - Paleoceanography - Wiley Online Library

Enhanced terrestrial weathering/runoff and surface ocean carbonate production during the recovery stages of the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum

1. D. Clay Kelly1,
2. James C. Zachos2,
3. Timothy J. Bralower3 and
4. Stephen A. Schellenberg4

Article first published online: 17 DEC 2005

DOI: 10.1029/2005PA001163

Copyright 2005 by the American Geophysical Union.
Abstract
[1] The carbonate saturation profile of the oceans shoaled markedly during a transient global warming event known as the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM) (circa 55 Ma). The rapid release of large quantities of carbon into the ocean-atmosphere system is believed to have triggered this intense episode of dissolution along with a negative carbon isotope excursion (CIE). The brevity (120–220 kyr) of the PETM reflects the rapid enhancement of negative feedback mechanisms within Earth's exogenic carbon cycle that served the dual function of buffering ocean pH and reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas levels. Detailed study of the PETM stratigraphy from Ocean Drilling Program Site 690 (Weddell Sea) reveals that the CIE recovery period, which postdates the CIE onset by ∼80 kyr, is represented by an expanded (∼2.5 m thick) interval containing a unique planktic foraminiferal assemblage strongly diluted by coccolithophore carbonate. Collectively, the micropaleontological and sedimentological changes preserved within the CIE recovery interval reflect a transient state when ocean-atmosphere chemistry fostered prolific coccolithophore blooms that suppressed the local lysocline to relatively deeper depths. A prominent peak in the abundance of the clay mineral kaolinite is associated with the CIE recovery interval, indicating that continental weathering/runoff intensified at this time as well (Robert and Kennett, 1994). Such parallel stratigraphic changes are generally consonant with the hypothesis that enhanced continental weathering/runoff and carbonate precipitation helped sequester carbon during the PETM recovery period (e.g., Dickens et al., 1997; Zachos et al., 2005).

 

[IanC]

"Shrew"?

Apparently, ugly sexism is now standard for all deniers.

Ian, hanging around WUWT has infected you with soul-rot. You need to separate yourself from that crowd, before you end up indistinguishable from Billy.

it is an apt description, as anyone who has visited her site would know. it wouldnt be so bad if she had anything else to say but it seems like her reason for being is simply to attack and denigrate. it seems that you and she have a lot in common.

 

[Crick]

Glad we know where you stand Ian.

 

[IanC]

Glad we know where you stand Ian.

hmmmm.....where do you think I stand? do you disagree that shrew is an apt description of her. or do you think words with a negative connotation and primarily associated with one gender are off limits?

 

[Crick]

I don't have the faintest idea who you're talking about, but sexism is completely analogous to racism.