Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your thread is about Israeli's not being allowed to move to the West Bank, even though people in the West Bank can't move to Israel.
You claim the Mexican government is intentionally moving it's citizens to the U.S. I think that you are the trolling turd.
Israeli citizens can move back/forth to and from the West bank 1,000 times per day if they want
I am quite sure you are unaware of the irony of the question you propose. The very foundation of Israel lies on illegal immigration.
"Illegal immigration"? Like who, the jews ethnically cleansed from arab muslim countries, which constitute over half of the Israeli jews? The real irony is from c-nts like you who 1) avoid the question because it exposes liars/frauds/hypocrites like you 2) ignores the millions of illegal alien muslims benefit shopping into Germany and Sweden while bypassing 30 other countries, including lots of other muslim ones.
I do not believe you have the intelligence or knowledge to participate in this thread, so you can GTFO of it at this time. Thanks for trying, chimp.
Oh then your OP is a worthless piece of stupid lying shit. K.
You are a stupid racist prick.
Your OP is half paranoid delusion and half displayed ignorance.
I got news for you Rhodhiss scholar, any Jew that wants can sneak their ass over the border and live among the Palestinians just like illegal immigrants sneak over the border here and live among us..
wow you are so triggered. I'll try to be more PC for you next timeOh then your OP is a worthless piece of stupid lying shit. K.
Doghshit like you are wholly incapable of discussing it, so leave the thread you fucking idiot.
wow you are so triggered. I'll try to be more PC for you next time
Looks like I'm the only one keeping your dumb fucking thread alive you weirdo.wow you are so triggered. I'll try to be more PC for you next time
Let's see now, the asshole tried to deflect and failed, then tried to insult and that didn't work - so now the fucking scumbag troll is trying to antagonize with childish sarcasm.
Yes asshole - you are no entrenched in the bottom of the cesspool that is my sig list of lowlifes, forever forgotten and rendered persona non grata - you do not even exist.
You are a stupid racist prick.
Liberal dogshit pulls out "you're a RACIST!" card because it lacks the brains to develop a real argument...
Your OP is half paranoid delusion and half displayed ignorance.
How so, c-nt? The UN/media and leftist assholes rail about how it is "illegal" for Israelis to move into the West bank, but are dead silent regarding the tens of millions of mexicans who have snuck into the US. Or are you in a dreamworld where you see insects on the wall and hear things under your bed?
I got news for you Rhodhiss scholar, any Jew that wants can sneak their ass over the border and live among the Palestinians just like illegal immigrants sneak over the border here and live among us..
Except again, idiot asshole, most other countries (pandering to the muslim filth) claim that it is illegal for Israelis to move to the west bank.
Read a newspaper, fucking idiot.
I called you a racist because you are. When you proclaim that the area of the West Bank as not been part of a defined nation in centuries you declare your racism.
Now, to your total ignorance. It is against United States law for Mexicans to enter the US without a visa and without proper authorization. Hell, you claim Israeli citizens can move back and forth across the West Bank whenever they want. Seems to me it would be pretty damn easy to stay if they wanted to. But here is the kicker. It is NOT against international law for Mexicans to enter the United States. The Israeli settlements on the West Bank ARE in violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW. Here, read a fucking newspaper.
I've wondered for some time why is it acceptable for SOME peoples to move en masse, like central/south americans/africans/muslims to the US, Canada or Europe, but it is NOT ok for other peoples to move.
For instance, mexico has buttressed its economy on moving a large portion of its population into the US, and given how corrupt the mexican government is, this can be considered intentional. After all, the convenient US safety valve allows mexico (and lots of other poorly-run countries south/outside of the US) to continue to operate corruptly/criminally, stealing its country's wealth and relieving the possibility of an uprising by the very people who would do so - basically forcing their hand to move out of the country.
That said, why is it acceptable to the UN, leftist media, etc for mexico to transfer a large portion of its population to the US, but not for Israelis to move to the west bank?
If anything, the mexican situation is worse, because they are moving into a fully functioning, sovereign nation - the Israelis are moving into a region that has not been part of a defined nation for centuries, if ever.
So I ask why, given how similar the two situations are, for the UN/media/leftists to attack Israelis for moving - but not for tens of millions of mexicans?
I should add in neither situation is either group fleeing as refugees.
The UN invented Israel.
The UN invented Israel.
Tell that to the arab muslims and their fascist friends, they are incapable of accepting its existence.
I called you a racist because you are. When you proclaim that the area of the West Bank as not been part of a defined nation in centuries you declare your racism.
I italicised the section of your post that not only doesn't even make sense since, claiming a historical fact does not even apply to the notion of racism, but since you are clearly an unintelligent parrot who keeps repeating the same drivel in place of a rational argument, I'll just keep ignoring your moronic comments on the matter.
Now, to your total ignorance. It is against United States law for Mexicans to enter the US without a visa and without proper authorization. Hell, you claim Israeli citizens can move back and forth across the West Bank whenever they want. Seems to me it would be pretty damn easy to stay if they wanted to. But here is the kicker. It is NOT against international law for Mexicans to enter the United States. The Israeli settlements on the West Bank ARE in violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW. Here, read a fucking newspaper.
Thanks for proving my point, you fucking idiot. There is no legal foundation why it is acceptable for millions of mexicans to be able to enter the US, while it is illegal for Israelis to enter the west bank. Thank you for doing the heavy lifting for me, imbecile.
I've wondered for some time why is it acceptable for SOME peoples to move en masse, like central/south americans/africans/muslims to the US, Canada or Europe, but it is NOT ok for other peoples to move.
For instance, mexico has buttressed its economy on moving a large portion of its population into the US, and given how corrupt the mexican government is, this can be considered intentional. After all, the convenient US safety valve allows mexico (and lots of other poorly-run countries south/outside of the US) to continue to operate corruptly/criminally, stealing its country's wealth and relieving the possibility of an uprising by the very people who would do so - basically forcing their hand to move out of the country.
That said, why is it acceptable to the UN, leftist media, etc for mexico to transfer a large portion of its population to the US, but not for Israelis to move to the west bank?
If anything, the mexican situation is worse, because they are moving into a fully functioning, sovereign nation - the Israelis are moving into a region that has not been part of a defined nation for centuries, if ever.
So I ask why, given how similar the two situations are, for the UN/media/leftists to attack Israelis for moving - but not for tens of millions of mexicans?
I should add in neither situation is either group fleeing as refugees.
Tell the Israelis to go back to their original borders first.
Obviously, you do not understand the difference between national laws and international law. If you would have read the link, you know, "read a newspaper", you would have learned that Israel signed the Geneva convention which prevents countries from moving populations into an OCCUPIED TERRITORY. It is a violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW.
The United States IS NOT an occupied territory.
Mexicans entering the United States might be violating United States law, which means it's the United States' problem to fix. But Israeli settlements on the West Bank are a violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW, which means it's the WORLD'S problem to fix..
Obviously, you do not understand the difference between national laws and international law. If you would have read the link, you know, "read a newspaper", you would have learned that Israel signed the Geneva convention which prevents countries from moving populations into an OCCUPIED TERRITORY. It is a violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Asshole, I knew the GC and the articles referring to this situation before you were born. They are NOT applicable as Israel is not transferrring anyone; the Israeli public can move there or not of their own free will - the government has not physically moved anyone into the west bank.
However, the government of mexico IS moving its people into the US by acting wholly corrupt, and not maintaining a functioning economy that could support its populace.
The United States IS NOT an occupied territory.
Really? You mean there's no one living in the US right now?
Mexicans entering the United States might be violating United States law, which means it's the United States' problem to fix. But Israeli settlements on the West Bank are a violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW, which means it's the WORLD'S problem to fix..
What difference does it make whether it is national or international, since borders are not set by international law unless BOTH parties agree to abide by an internationally-sanctioned body such as the UN - which in 1948 the Israelis did, but the arab muslims did NOT. Go read a history book.
Nah, I doubt you are as old as me.
You wouldn't be this stupid.
This is about international law. Which has a very precise definition of "occupied territory".
And this is about the Geneva Convention, which Israel did sign and is a party to.
Not only are the settlements on the West Bank illegal, they are a bonafide WAR CRIME.
