Why aren't liberals protesting the NFL?

What makes you think I dont believe in capitalism?

Your support of public welfare for some firms.

If the Vikings wanna leave MN, they are free to tell the govt there "We're leaving. But a new stadium would make us think twice. Get back to us."

Thats the ultimate free market. If LA will build them one, and MN wont, bye bye.

:lol::lol: Yes, extorting taxpayer funds and whining at the public coffers is the ultimate free market!
 
Currently, the Minnesota Vikings are trying to force the people of the city/state of MN to pay for a new stadium. If not, they may move the team to LA. A major economic booster for the city, the Vikings leaving could hurt them.

So, as much as the left hates rich people, we have the Minnesota Vikings, owned by rich people, a team played and coached by millionaires, demanding ordinary people of Minny pay for their new sandbox???

This happens all around the NFL, with teams owned by billionaires, played by millionaires, demanding "99%ers" pay for their stadiums.

Why isn't the left protesting and demonizing the NFL?:eusa_whistle:

Not following your logic..

How, in your convoluted mind, does this become a left/right issue?


Imagine if rich Bank of America CEO's were forcing the local taxpayers to pay for a new skyscraper for them to work in, with the threat of moving out of the city???


Now. Why isn't the left protesting NFL teams doing this?

Now imagine that a skyscraper is like an NFL stadium. :eusa_shhh:
 
Ok then. Liberals have confirmed the logical similarities. I've seen protests outside Bank of America, vandalism to buildings of other big rich companies.

Why did they leave out this one? Shouldnt they hate these rich people just as much?

I hate Bill Bidwell more than you could ever know. Second only to Art Modell.

Feel better now?

Now there is a name that will make anyone stop to pause "Bill Bidwell", the best thing that ever happened to the Arizona Cardinals was when his son took over the business at least he has shown some efforts to actually care for the community in which he lives in. If anyone wants to see a model on how to get a taxpayer to pay for a stadium, see "Bill Bidwell", when you do you will notice that most of those who were for or against it crossed every party line you can imagine. Guess what? We now have a big silver "toaster" here in Glendale that hosts what is perhaps still the worst franchise in the NFL, but hey, at least we had a few Super Bowls, but ask the taxpayers here who have had to pay for that everytime we pay or taxes if that facility has been more financially helpful to them personally or the Arizona Cardinals? and you will get a different answer. In fact if one were to look at the Stadium you will see no reference to anything that suggests the people of Arizona even helped pay for the thing. The bottom line is those folks in Minn. are going down the same path we here in Arizona did to build a new stadium and if they were smart the taxpayers would demand from the ownership some say so in it financially. If Vikings are unwilling to do so, and think that the mere presence of the Vikings is enough to let people their bask in the the glow of their wonderful presence, then again I say, fans of Minn. support U of M, and use your tax dollars to buy the Vikings some moving vans.
 
Currently, the Minnesota Vikings are trying to force the people of the city/state of MN to pay for a new stadium. If not, they may move the team to LA. A major economic booster for the city, the Vikings leaving could hurt them.

So, as much as the left hates rich people, we have the Minnesota Vikings, owned by rich people, a team played and coached by millionaires, demanding ordinary people of Minny pay for their new sandbox???

This happens all around the NFL, with teams owned by billionaires, played by millionaires, demanding "99%ers" pay for their stadiums.

Why isn't the left protesting and demonizing the NFL?:eusa_whistle:

Progressives only attack white old men making 200k +.

Of course they're fine with a 25-year-old black guy making 9 million annually...

Progressives just hate white people - especially old white people...
 
Ok then. Liberals have confirmed the logical similarities. I've seen protests outside Bank of America, vandalism to buildings of other big rich companies.

Why did they leave out this one? Shouldnt they hate these rich people just as much?

Liberals don't hate rich people....we just believe they should not get as many perks and contribute more to society

If Minnesota wants to keep the Vikings....build a new stadium
If not.....then don't whine when they leave

It's a free country

They contribute over 90% of the revenue to your beloved governments. They fund most of the corporations in this nation, that provide us so many jobs and products and entertainment. What more do you want them to "contribute"?

Oh, thats right, you all want them to pay for your housing, healthcare, education, transportation and anything else you WANT but dont want to pay for.

So, would you tell Seattle residents to stop whining about Boeing relocating a lot of it's jobs to Charleston, SC, because it was economically better for Boeing? Because Obama Inc filed a lawsuit over that one, and Seattle liberals were irate and there were hateful cartoons in the Seattle media mocking the people of SC over it.
 
Not following your logic..

How, in your convoluted mind, does this become a left/right issue?


Imagine if rich Bank of America CEO's were forcing the local taxpayers to pay for a new skyscraper for them to work in, with the threat of moving out of the city???


Now. Why isn't the left protesting NFL teams doing this?

Now imagine that a skyscraper is like an NFL stadium. :eusa_shhh:

Both are big ass buildings that rich people do business in. What else ya need?
 
After Jr. Seau's suicide, watch the NFL become a liberal cause, they have sent his brain to be examined to see if his suicide is related to brain damage he received by getting his head bashed in over and over again. This will become a liberal cause.

Just as dodge ball and tag became too violent for school yards, football will become too dangerous to be played as is, it's already been pussified.
 
Ok then. Liberals have confirmed the logical similarities. I've seen protests outside Bank of America, vandalism to buildings of other big rich companies.

Why did they leave out this one? Shouldnt they hate these rich people just as much?

Liberals don't hate rich people....we just believe they should not get as many perks and contribute more to society

If Minnesota wants to keep the Vikings....build a new stadium
If not.....then don't whine when they leave

It's a free country

No, you do hate rich people, moreover you hate WHITE rich people.

If you didn't hate rich people you wouldn't be here -- get it dummy?

Fucking tyrant..............
 
After Jr. Seau's suicide, watch the NFL become a liberal cause, they have sent his brain to be examined to see if his suicide is related to brain damage he received by getting his head bashed in over and over again. This will become a liberal cause.

Just as dodge ball and tag became too violent for school yards, football will become too dangerous to be played as is, it's already been pussified.

Flag football...

Hell, the NHL has already turned into pussy shit...

Both leagues are breeding individuals that cant take a hit....
 
After Jr. Seau's suicide, watch the NFL become a liberal cause, they have sent his brain to be examined to see if his suicide is related to brain damage he received by getting his head bashed in over and over again. This will become a liberal cause.

Just as dodge ball and tag became too violent for school yards, football will become too dangerous to be played as is, it's already been pussified.

Its already happening. A liberal blog is advocating it. A leftie is on Slate saying it. Liberals have wanted to go after football for decades. Just like the military, football is a bastion of machismo, alpha male behavior, violence and little tolerance for outside influences. They wanna take it down badly.

Hell, liberal hero FDR used the federal govt to ban a particular football play, the "flying wedge", a kickoff return play, because it was too dangerous. The Feds, banning a sports play.
 
Ok then. Liberals have confirmed the logical similarities. I've seen protests outside Bank of America, vandalism to buildings of other big rich companies.

Why did they leave out this one? Shouldnt they hate these rich people just as much?

I hate Bill Bidwell more than you could ever know. Second only to Art Modell.

Feel better now?

Now there is a name that will make anyone stop to pause "Bill Bidwell", the best thing that ever happened to the Arizona Cardinals was when his son took over the business at least he has shown some efforts to actually care for the community in which he lives in. If anyone wants to see a model on how to get a taxpayer to pay for a stadium, see "Bill Bidwell", when you do you will notice that most of those who were for or against it crossed every party line you can imagine. Guess what? We now have a big silver "toaster" here in Glendale that hosts what is perhaps still the worst franchise in the NFL, but hey, at least we had a few Super Bowls, but ask the taxpayers here who have had to pay for that everytime we pay or taxes if that facility has been more financially helpful to them personally or the Arizona Cardinals? and you will get a different answer. In fact if one were to look at the Stadium you will see no reference to anything that suggests the people of Arizona even helped pay for the thing. The bottom line is those folks in Minn. are going down the same path we here in Arizona did to build a new stadium and if they were smart the taxpayers would demand from the ownership some say so in it financially. If Vikings are unwilling to do so, and think that the mere presence of the Vikings is enough to let people their bask in the the glow of their wonderful presence, then again I say, fans of Minn. support U of M, and use your tax dollars to buy the Vikings some moving vans.

I still hate the bastard for leaving St. Louis:eusa_angel:

Believe me, we knew what you were getting:lol:
 
Ok then. Liberals have confirmed the logical similarities. I've seen protests outside Bank of America, vandalism to buildings of other big rich companies.

Why did they leave out this one? Shouldnt they hate these rich people just as much?

Liberals don't hate rich people....we just believe they should not get as many perks and contribute more to society

If Minnesota wants to keep the Vikings....build a new stadium
If not.....then don't whine when they leave

It's a free country

They contribute over 90% of the revenue to your beloved governments. They fund most of the corporations in this nation, that provide us so many jobs and products and entertainment. What more do you want them to "contribute"?

Oh, thats right, you all want them to pay for your housing, healthcare, education, transportation and anything else you WANT but dont want to pay for.

So, would you tell Seattle residents to stop whining about Boeing relocating a lot of it's jobs to Charleston, SC, because it was economically better for Boeing? Because Obama Inc filed a lawsuit over that one, and Seattle liberals were irate and there were hateful cartoons in the Seattle media mocking the people of SC over it.

You control 90% of the wealth.....don't complain if you pay 90% of the taxes
I just don't see why we should continue policies that enable you to accumulate more wealth

I didn't give a shit if Boeing moved or not
Just like I dont care if the Vikings move. Minnesota has a piece of shit stadium. If they dont want to cough up the money for a modern facility...don't bitch if someone else does
 
I love how this thread has developed. I'm sure all of the players with TBI's, depression or those who have committed suicide don't want to see the game become any safer.

Nor do the parents of kids growing up in the game now.

If you want it to be safer, you're clearly a pussy. (well, that's what people who don't actually play the game say...)
 
After Jr. Seau's suicide, watch the NFL become a liberal cause, they have sent his brain to be examined to see if his suicide is related to brain damage he received by getting his head bashed in over and over again. This will become a liberal cause.

Just as dodge ball and tag became too violent for school yards, football will become too dangerous to be played as is, it's already been pussified.

Its already happening. A liberal blog is advocating it. A leftie is on Slate saying it. Liberals have wanted to go after football for decades. Just like the military, football is a bastion of machismo, alpha male behavior, violence and little tolerance for outside influences. They wanna take it down badly.

Hell, liberal hero FDR used the federal govt to ban a particular football play, the "flying wedge", a kickoff return play, because it was too dangerous. The Feds, banning a sports play.

It was Republican Theodore Roosevelt who banned the flying wedge
 
I am a bit confused about thius thread...and what poisition any9one on either side of the aisle is taking.

But my personal psotioion is this.....the owner of the team can do whatever the hell he/she wants with the team.

Likewise, the residents of the city/state, through their legislatiure, can do whatever the hell they want to do in regard to satisfying the demands of the team.

I just dont see what this has to do with left and right.
 
Liberals don't hate rich people....we just believe they should not get as many perks and contribute more to society

If Minnesota wants to keep the Vikings....build a new stadium
If not.....then don't whine when they leave

It's a free country

They contribute over 90% of the revenue to your beloved governments. They fund most of the corporations in this nation, that provide us so many jobs and products and entertainment. What more do you want them to "contribute"?

Oh, thats right, you all want them to pay for your housing, healthcare, education, transportation and anything else you WANT but dont want to pay for.

So, would you tell Seattle residents to stop whining about Boeing relocating a lot of it's jobs to Charleston, SC, because it was economically better for Boeing? Because Obama Inc filed a lawsuit over that one, and Seattle liberals were irate and there were hateful cartoons in the Seattle media mocking the people of SC over it.

You control 90% of the wealth.....don't complain if you pay 90% of the taxes
I just don't see why we should continue policies that enable you to accumulate more wealth

I didn't give a shit if Boeing moved or not
Just like I dont care if the Vikings move. Minnesota has a piece of shit stadium. If they dont want to cough up the money for a modern facility...don't bitch if someone else does



Those same policies also allow YOU or any other whining liberal to accumulate wealth. Thats the beauty of capitalism over socialism or communism, is that ANYONE can get rich.

But you gotta work, and not take out 100K in loans to major in "Diversity Studies" to do it.
 
I am a bit confused about thius thread...and what poisition any9one on either side of the aisle is taking.

But my personal psotioion is this.....the owner of the team can do whatever the hell he/she wants with the team.

Likewise, the residents of the city/state, through their legislatiure, can do whatever the hell they want to do in regard to satisfying the demands of the team.

I just dont see what this has to do with left and right.

Well Jarhead, someone mentioned the word NFL and Football, *laughs, the "left and right" part got left on the bench! Now having said that, I just tossed the Arizona Cardinals stadium out there as somthing for people to look at. It had nothing at all to do with a left or right thing, you had one part of town saying, no way they were going to pay for a stadium that there was no return on, and another "Glendale" in this case, that said, heck yes, we will build it here.
 
After Jr. Seau's suicide, watch the NFL become a liberal cause, they have sent his brain to be examined to see if his suicide is related to brain damage he received by getting his head bashed in over and over again. This will become a liberal cause.

Just as dodge ball and tag became too violent for school yards, football will become too dangerous to be played as is, it's already been pussified.

Its already happening. A liberal blog is advocating it. A leftie is on Slate saying it. Liberals have wanted to go after football for decades. Just like the military, football is a bastion of machismo, alpha male behavior, violence and little tolerance for outside influences. They wanna take it down badly.

Hell, liberal hero FDR used the federal govt to ban a particular football play, the "flying wedge", a kickoff return play, because it was too dangerous. The Feds, banning a sports play.

It was Republican Theodore Roosevelt who banned the flying wedge



You know what.........you're right, I was wrong. I always thought it was FDR, looked it up, and I stand corrected.

Republican Theodore Roosevelt banned a football play.

Democrat and liberal hero FDR.......rounded up US citizens and put them in prison camps for NO OTHER reason than being of Japanese or German heritage.

Sorry bout that mixup.
 
Not following your logic..

How, in your convoluted mind, does this become a left/right issue?


Imagine if rich Bank of America CEO's were forcing the local taxpayers to pay for a new skyscraper for them to work in, with the threat of moving out of the city???

Now. Why isn't the left protesting NFL teams doing this?

It happens all the time. Rich corporations demand tax breaks and subsidies or they will move out of state. The NFL is no different.

What does this have to do with the left?

Tax breaks are different that actual tax dollars being spend you dope!
 

Forum List

Back
Top