Why are the Seahawks 3rd from the bottom on opening odds to win SB XLVI?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ginscpy

Senior Member
Sep 10, 2010
7,950
228
48
Just saw it in todays paper.

Couldn't believe it.

100-1 odds - ahead of only Buffalo and Carolina.

Didn't they win their division over teams with better odds (SF, St louis, Arizona.)?

Didnt they beat the defending SB champs Saints in the first round?

And they made a game of it in the second half in Chicago.
 
Last edited:
Why are the Seahawks 3rd from the bottom on opening odds to win SB XLVI?

Because the Rams are winning that division next season and Seattle wont even be in the playoffs.
 
Seattle was 7-9 last season and deserved it.

The only reason I would give them better odds is that they play in a piss poor division and it is easy to get a home game in the playoffs
 
Good BB Material for Pete Carroll - hope he posts those odds in the Seahawks locker room.

Meanwhile - the Chargers are overrated as usual - tied for 2nd - with NE and Pitt -at 10-1.

The bolts didnt even make the playoffs in 2010.
 
Seattle sports team don't get any respect.

Hawks were 6 point underdogs to the Steelers in 2006 SB -despite fact they had a better record at 12-4, and Steelers were Wild Card. Sure -the Stealers won in worst reffed game in SB history - if Hawks had played their usual game they would have won by 10.

This season - Terry Bradshaw (one of the reasons I am glad Pitt lost to GB) - referered to Seattle as "Alaska South")

Should have said Alaska Left -don't think Sarah Palin has ever set foot in Seattle.
 
Just saw it in todays paper.

Couldn't believe it.

100-1 odds - ahead of only Buffalo and Carolina.

Didn't they win their division over teams with better odds (SF, St louis, Arizona.)?

Didnt they beat the defending SB champs Saints in the first round?

And they made a game of it in the second half in Chicago.
Self proclaimed "experts" in sports media haven't a clue. It only matters that they make the playoffs.

This is just helping the Vegas bookies set the odds.
 
Seattle sports team don't get any respect.

Hawks were 6 point underdogs to the Steelers in 2006 SB -despite fact they had a better record at 12-4, and Steelers were Wild Card. Sure -the Stealers won in worst reffed game in SB history - if Hawks had played their usual game they would have won by 10.

This season - Terry Bradshaw (one of the reasons I am glad Pitt lost to GB) - referered to Seattle as "Alaska South")

Should have said Alaska Left -don't think Sarah Palin has ever set foot in Seattle.

I usually think that losing teams that complain about the refs are whiners

In that case, I thought Seattle got hosed. There were about five calls that you could argue "could go either way". They all went to Pittsburgh. Any of those calls would have made a difference in the outcome
 
Last edited:
Seattle sports team don't get any respect.

Hawks were 6 point underdogs to the Steelers in 2006 SB -despite fact they had a better record at 12-4, and Steelers were Wild Card. Sure -the Stealers won in worst reffed game in SB history - if Hawks had played their usual game they would have won by 10.

This season - Terry Bradshaw (one of the reasons I am glad Pitt lost to GB) - referered to Seattle as "Alaska South")

Should have said Alaska Left -don't think Sarah Palin has ever set foot in Seattle.

I usually think that losing teams that complain about the refs are whiners

In that case, I thought Seattle got hosed. There were about five calls that you could argue "could go either way". They all went to Pittsburgh. Any of those calls would have made a difference in the outcome
Yep. Even Big Ben himself said he didn't make it into the endzone on that one scoring drive.
 
After Pete Carroll was hired - Seahawks had the biggest player turnover in the NFL.

Do you think he is going to stand pat in the off season?

Don't think so.

Number One priority is resigning HASS.

Seahawks will blow down the door getting into the playoffs in 2011 - not sneak-in the backdoor.

3rd from the bottom lol
 
Unless there have been/are expected to be major personnel moves in Seattle, third from the bottom is silly.

On the other hand, they were 7-9, did not play well for a lot of the season, so they shouldn't be ranked too high, either.

And, of course, these kinds of projections are always going to be subjective and arbitrary.
 
what do these oddsmaker dorks know anyway?????????

not much

First team in history to get in the playoff with a 7-9 record-thenbeat the defending SB champs

Should be the SLAKMDUNK favs for the NFC West in 2011

Make history and be the team with the longest odds to win a Super bowl
 
what do these oddsmaker dorks know anyway?????????

not much

First team in history to get in the playoff with a 7-9 record-thenbeat the defending SB champs

Should be the SLAKMDUNK favs for the NFC West in 2011

Make history and be the team with the longest odds to win a Super bowl

They will finish second to the Rams and not make the playoffs
 
They punked the Rams to win the NFC title in 2010 at Qwest.

Rams rookie QB had deer-in-headlights-look.
 
Pete Carroll was the 4th choice at USC in 2001. Went 6-6 first season - incl ugly bowl loss.

Then went on a dynasty run at USC.

He gets players to play to their max.

For instance - Clay Mathews of the Packers was a walk-on at USC.

In first season at Seattle -won the div - won the first playoff game - yet the oddsmakers reward that by makingthe Seahawks the 3rd worst bet to win SB 46.

Fuck You!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go Seahawks...........................
 
This ain't college

It is harder for Pete Carroll to cheat in the NFL
 
What do these oddsmaker-smucks have for a life?????????/

Seahawks the 3rd worst team in the NFL???????? Give them some love. Worse than Cleveland or Cincy or whoever?

Off the closing in 2010/11 and Qwest Stadiun 12tr Man?????????????????

They probbably would have picks the Colts over the Jets in SB III.
 
What do these oddsmaker-smucks have for a life?????????/

Seahawks the 3rd worst team in the NFL???????? Give them some love. Worse than Cleveland or Cincy or whoever?

Off the closing in 2010/11 and Qwest Stadiun 12tr Man?????????????????

They probbably would have picks the Colts over the Jets in SB III.

Why are you raising such a fuss?

If you think 100-1 is so far off the mark, why don't you take the bet and invest in your beloved Seahawks? Should be a sucker bet in your favor

$100 will get you $10,000 when Seattle wins the SuperBowl next year
 
Last edited:
They win the NFC West again (this time with a winning record) - get a home game playoff in the first round

asshole oddsmakers dont have a clue calling them the 3rd worst team out of 32 in the nfl

100-1 odds - better than only Buffalo and Carolina - WTF IS THAT??????????????????????????????
 
Last edited:
How can the odds-makers disrespect a team that much ( or be so CLUELESS)- to tell them they are the 3rd worst team in the NFL?????

SEE YOU IN DEC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
How can the odds-makers disrespect a team that much ( or be so CLUELESS)- to tell them they are the 3rd worst team in the NFL?????

SEE YOU IN DEC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If it makes ya feel any better..the Dallas Cowboys are number three favorites and they had a worse record than Seattle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top