Who would you vote for ? VotePolitics

It's whey too early...
Are you kidding? You don't even have a front runner? If I had to pick right now it would be Barney Frank then Elizabeth Warren then Hillary then Jeb Bush. Look I already have 4 choices.
I am still waiting for their platform to appear...
It is coming.

tt150423.gif
 
the shitty thing about sanders with the lead is, if he gets the medias backing, he very well could be the next Pres.

understand he feeds the victim mentality of the left and acts like there's no end to other peoples money
Actually his health care plan is much more efficient and cost effective than aca.

Education is an investment that can yield returns. How can we expect to stay on top of the world if we treat education as an extra cost option?
educate yourself

the cost of college has far, far far far exceeded the cost of everything else, B/C they get tax money.

so unless you are willing to force colleges to charge only so much, your support for more tax money is just foolish
Free college would only apply to public institutions that are already regulated by governing bodies. So I don't see a great increase in cost.

Educated people make more money and are more likely to start businesses creating jobs. This improves our economy, increases the tax base, and makes us more competitive in the world market.

I don't see a valid argument against it.
how is free college paid for?
college can and has been charging whatever it wants at an increasing rate
tuition outpaced gas, healthcare, everything, by a mile.

the valid argument is that you fail to see the results of spending more, you think detroit, greece, ussr, china, cuba, nk, won't happen, this time, b/c you don't like the reality of what you support, so you stick with the theory
 
the shitty thing about sanders with the lead is, if he gets the medias backing, he very well could be the next Pres.

understand he feeds the victim mentality of the left and acts like there's no end to other peoples money
Actually his health care plan is much more efficient and cost effective than aca.

Education is an investment that can yield returns. How can we expect to stay on top of the world if we treat education as an extra cost option?
educate yourself

the cost of college has far, far far far exceeded the cost of everything else, B/C they get tax money.

so unless you are willing to force colleges to charge only so much, your support for more tax money is just foolish
Free college would only apply to public institutions that are already regulated by governing bodies. So I don't see a great increase in cost.

Educated people make more money and are more likely to start businesses creating jobs. This improves our economy, increases the tax base, and makes us more competitive in the world market.

I don't see a valid argument against it.
how is free college paid for?
college can and has been charging whatever it wants at an increasing rate
tuition outpaced gas, healthcare, everything, by a mile.

the valid argument is that you fail to see the results of spending more, you think detroit, greece, ussr, china, cuba, nk, won't happen, this time, b/c you don't like the reality of what you support, so you stick with the theory
We have a lot of money. It is a matter of allocating it to our best advantage.

 
the shitty thing about sanders with the lead is, if he gets the medias backing, he very well could be the next Pres.

understand he feeds the victim mentality of the left and acts like there's no end to other peoples money
Actually his health care plan is much more efficient and cost effective than aca.

Education is an investment that can yield returns. How can we expect to stay on top of the world if we treat education as an extra cost option?
educate yourself

the cost of college has far, far far far exceeded the cost of everything else, B/C they get tax money.

so unless you are willing to force colleges to charge only so much, your support for more tax money is just foolish
Free college would only apply to public institutions that are already regulated by governing bodies. So I don't see a great increase in cost.

Educated people make more money and are more likely to start businesses creating jobs. This improves our economy, increases the tax base, and makes us more competitive in the world market.

I don't see a valid argument against it.
how is free college paid for?
college can and has been charging whatever it wants at an increasing rate
tuition outpaced gas, healthcare, everything, by a mile.

the valid argument is that you fail to see the results of spending more, you think detroit, greece, ussr, china, cuba, nk, won't happen, this time, b/c you don't like the reality of what you support, so you stick with the theory
We have a lot of money. It is a matter of allocating it to our best advantage.


we have $18 Trillion in debt.

reality, it's right there in front of you
 
Actually his health care plan is much more efficient and cost effective than aca.

Education is an investment that can yield returns. How can we expect to stay on top of the world if we treat education as an extra cost option?
educate yourself

the cost of college has far, far far far exceeded the cost of everything else, B/C they get tax money.

so unless you are willing to force colleges to charge only so much, your support for more tax money is just foolish
Free college would only apply to public institutions that are already regulated by governing bodies. So I don't see a great increase in cost.

Educated people make more money and are more likely to start businesses creating jobs. This improves our economy, increases the tax base, and makes us more competitive in the world market.

I don't see a valid argument against it.
how is free college paid for?
college can and has been charging whatever it wants at an increasing rate
tuition outpaced gas, healthcare, everything, by a mile.

the valid argument is that you fail to see the results of spending more, you think detroit, greece, ussr, china, cuba, nk, won't happen, this time, b/c you don't like the reality of what you support, so you stick with the theory
We have a lot of money. It is a matter of allocating it to our best advantage.


we have $18 Trillion in debt.

reality, it's right there in front of you

Well she mentioned $2.3T missing from the Pentagon which was missing over a period of time. About 1/4 of the Pentagon's money goes missing every year. Later she found that $1T was missing from HUD. The question is who is getting that money?

 
educate yourself

the cost of college has far, far far far exceeded the cost of everything else, B/C they get tax money.

so unless you are willing to force colleges to charge only so much, your support for more tax money is just foolish
Free college would only apply to public institutions that are already regulated by governing bodies. So I don't see a great increase in cost.

Educated people make more money and are more likely to start businesses creating jobs. This improves our economy, increases the tax base, and makes us more competitive in the world market.

I don't see a valid argument against it.
how is free college paid for?
college can and has been charging whatever it wants at an increasing rate
tuition outpaced gas, healthcare, everything, by a mile.

the valid argument is that you fail to see the results of spending more, you think detroit, greece, ussr, china, cuba, nk, won't happen, this time, b/c you don't like the reality of what you support, so you stick with the theory
We have a lot of money. It is a matter of allocating it to our best advantage.


we have $18 Trillion in debt.

reality, it's right there in front of you

Well she mentioned $2.3T missing from the Pentagon which was missing over a period of time. About 1/4 of the Pentagon's money goes missing every year. Later she found that $1T was missing from HUD. The question is who is getting that money?


the government, that you want to make larger and give more control to, is taking it, either for themselves or in the form of payoffs.

so the logical conclusion, would be to shrink government and shrink the spending. less money is easier to track making it less likely to lose large amounts.
 
Would would you vote for in the next presidential election ?

Vote at votepolitics.us and follow latest news feed.

No Way shape or form do I make money from this, trying to get some data from real internet users for fun, tell me what you think.
  • Bernie Sanders
    70%

  • Hillary Clinton
    26.67%

  • Joe Biden
    3.33%

  • Jim Webb
    0%

  • Lincoln Chafee
    0%

  • Martin O'Malley
    0%
    ----------------------
    • Rand Paul
      50%

    • Ben Carson
      37.5%

    • Mike Huckabee
      12.5%

    • Bobby Jindal
      0%

    • Carly Fiorina
      0%

    • Chris Christie
      0%

    • Donald Trump
      0%

    • George Pataki
      0%

    • Jeb Bush
      0%


Does your antisemitism allow you to vote for a Jew?
 
Would would you vote for in the next presidential election ?

Vote at votepolitics.us and follow latest news feed.

No Way shape or form do I make money from this, trying to get some data from real internet users for fun, tell me what you think.
  • Bernie Sanders
    70%

  • Hillary Clinton
    26.67%

  • Joe Biden
    3.33%

  • Jim Webb
    0%

  • Lincoln Chafee
    0%

  • Martin O'Malley
    0%
    ----------------------
    • Rand Paul
      50%

    • Ben Carson
      37.5%

    • Mike Huckabee
      12.5%

    • Bobby Jindal
      0%

    • Carly Fiorina
      0%

    • Chris Christie
      0%

    • Donald Trump
      0%

    • George Pataki
      0%

    • Jeb Bush
      0%


Does your antisemitism allow you to vote for a Jew?

Pffft!
 
almost 200 people have voted on the website, that's awesome. The leading candidates are very unexpected. Thanks for helping out on the voting. If you still haven't voted go on and vote ^^
 

Forum List

Back
Top