Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sounds like you're drunk on the stuff.Kool-aid severs like Trump always have people that will drink their kool-aid.
Kool-aid severs like Trump always have people that will drink their kool-aid.
You've made it clear that nothing can sink in through your thick mellon. It was a tactical strike not meant for major damage. Of course it could have been. Glad you know more than the generals.As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
It was not a tactical action as you claim, or at least not one that worked. It was a military attack used as a strategic. Aircraft were flying missions from the target within hours after the attack. What do you think the tactical purpose of the mission was?You've made it clear that nothing can sink in through your thick mellon. It was a tactical strike not meant for major damage. Of course it could have been. Glad you know more than the generals.As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
The airstrip was left intact for a reason. If they wanted to it could have been destroyed. This is being discussed in numerous areas of the board. If you can't be bothered that's fine with me.It was not a tactical action as you claim, or at least not one that worked. It was a military attack used as a strategic. Aircraft were flying missions from the target within hours after the attack. What do you think the tactical purpose of the mission was?You've made it clear that nothing can sink in through your thick mellon. It was a tactical strike not meant for major damage. Of course it could have been. Glad you know more than the generals.As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
Living in a fantasy land where if you speak a lie, it becomes truth, only exists in your tiny leprosy infected brain.Dems?No. Republicans? I doubt it.
Where is the basis of Trump now?
It looks like only Israel, Merkel, MSM, Neocons, NWO and probably NATO.
Maybe so "someones" aircraft can land there.The airstrip was left intact for a reason. If they wanted to it could have been destroyed. This is being discussed in numerous areas of the board. If you can't be bothered that's fine with me.It was not a tactical action as you claim, or at least not one that worked. It was a military attack used as a strategic. Aircraft were flying missions from the target within hours after the attack. What do you think the tactical purpose of the mission was?You've made it clear that nothing can sink in through your thick mellon. It was a tactical strike not meant for major damage. Of course it could have been. Glad you know more than the generals.As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
I know the difference between a tactical maneuver and a strategic maneuver. You apparently do not,The airstrip was left intact for a reason. If they wanted to it could have been destroyed. This is being discussed in numerous areas of the board. If you can't be bothered that's fine with me.It was not a tactical action as you claim, or at least not one that worked. It was a military attack used as a strategic. Aircraft were flying missions from the target within hours after the attack. What do you think the tactical purpose of the mission was?You've made it clear that nothing can sink in through your thick mellon. It was a tactical strike not meant for major damage. Of course it could have been. Glad you know more than the generals.As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
All of Syria's airstrips are 'hardened'. Which means nothing short of a nuclear bomb would destroy them. Drop a cruise missile on an airport in Syria and the repairs take a couple of hours.The airstrip was left intact for a reason. If they wanted to it could have been destroyed. This is being discussed in numerous areas of the board. If you can't be bothered that's fine with me.It was not a tactical action as you claim, or at least not one that worked. It was a military attack used as a strategic. Aircraft were flying missions from the target within hours after the attack. What do you think the tactical purpose of the mission was?You've made it clear that nothing can sink in through your thick mellon. It was a tactical strike not meant for major damage. Of course it could have been. Glad you know more than the generals.As it sinks in that trump's pitiful and weak air strike was and is a failure, the folks who supported his action, but not necessarily him, will change their minds about his lame publicity stunt.
