Whitehouse ***ADMITS*** no evidence of foreign interference in the election process !!!!!!!!!

[Contumacious]

BULLSHIT.

SHOW ME WHERE CLAPPER, THE WHITE OR SENATE DEMOCRATS HAVE MADE THAT DISTINCTION CLEAR.


.


.

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the fuck you . stop toeing the party line

What are you implying? Sounds like you're saying that the intelligence report was manufactured for political reasons and not based on real intelligence... is that what you think?

THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT" WAS MANUFACTURED

Show me where they say that they have HARD EVIDENCE OF CYBERATTACKS

The "intelligence report" is based on "conclusions"

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

con·clu·sion
kənˈklo͞oZHən/
noun

1. 2.
   a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
   "each research group came to a similar conclusion"
   synonyms: deduction, inference, interpretation, reasoning; More

Page 2 paragraph 6 under key judgements of the report. Did you even read it or are you stuck on Breitbart?

Read the US Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking | Mother Jones

I am looking for HARD EVIDENCE that the Russians hacked our electoral system

I do NOT want to read "conclusions" or :analysis"

Show me the NSA report showing ACTUAL HACKING

 

[TheOldSchool]

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the fuck you . stop toeing the party line

What are you implying? Sounds like you're saying that the intelligence report was manufactured for political reasons and not based on real intelligence... is that what you think?

THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT" WAS MANUFACTURED

Show me where they say that they have HARD EVIDENCE OF CYBERATTACKS

The "intelligence report" is based on "conclusions"

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

con·clu·sion
kənˈklo͞oZHən/
noun

1. 2.
   a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
   "each research group came to a similar conclusion"
   synonyms: deduction, inference, interpretation, reasoning; More

INSTEAD OF POSTING A MONTH AND A HALF OLD ARTICLE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ALLEGATIONS AGAINST RUSSIA, WHY DON'T YOU READ YESTERDAY'S REPORT YOURSELF YOU DUMB FUCKING RUBE:

Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections

Because I don't like FICTION


.

Wow

 

[Contumacious]

Where the evidence?

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

Hell yes they should. Just as they should have released the proof of weapons of mass destruction under W. See where this is going?

So to be clear, if the CIA has a man inside the Russian gov or if they have tapped into their communications you think it's a smart thing to release that information to the public? Do you have any worries about compromising those assets?

After all of the govt lies is iraq war, syria, Benghazi, obamacare, you think I'm going to take them at their word?

Answer my question... you completely dodged it

How do you "tap" cellphones

Are you saying that the Russkies are smart enough to hack out electoral process but do not know how to use VPN?


.

 

[Contumacious]

Exactly.

The CIA has been politicized:

"Indeed, that the CIA is not only suddenly involved, but suddenly at the forefront, may well reflect President-elect Trump’s stated policy intentions being far removed from those that the CIA has endorsed, and might be done with an eye toward undermining Trump’s position in those upcoming policy battles."


.

Exactly? Did you not read anything I wrote?

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS FUCKING IRRELEVANT


.

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Define "malicious interference"

Is that what the US was doing in Ukraine?

/

CLOSER TO WHAT THE RUSSIANS DID WHEN THEY INVADED AND CONQUERED PARTS OF THE UKRAINE. "MALICIOUSLY."

Where did JFK get the authority to demand that the USSR remove missiles from Cuba?

I guess Putin was using the same authority?

Do you reckon?


.

 

[Contumacious]

Truth = meddling

Snowflake logic

character assassination
noun

1. the malicious and unjustified harming of a person's good reputation.

.

Truth is the ultimate defense.

Let's see Donna Brazil's sue someone for anything regarding her giving debate questions to the DNC.

She tried lying that her emails were altered when the emails were first released. Where did that bullshit story go?

Can't trust the motherfuckers

They did to Sanders

And thought they could do it to DJT

Boy were they wrong


.

 

[Contumacious]

Exactly.

The CIA has been politicized:

"Indeed, that the CIA is not only suddenly involved, but suddenly at the forefront, may well reflect President-elect Trump’s stated policy intentions being far removed from those that the CIA has endorsed, and might be done with an eye toward undermining Trump’s position in those upcoming policy battles."


.

Exactly? Did you not read anything I wrote?

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS FUCKING IRRELEVANT


.

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Define "malicious interference"

Is that what the US was doing in Ukraine?

/

I would not be surprised if the US is guilty of doing similar things in other countries... are trying to use that accusation to justify Russiams actions?? The fact that you are trying dismiss and now justify cyberattacks by Russia is quite baffling... are you an American?

Show me HARD EVIDENCE of CYBERATTACKS then we shall talk.


.

 

[Contumacious]

U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

------________

But suddenly they changed their minds, an afterthought, in order to discredit the Trump administration

Me thinks motherfucking Clapper is LYING AGAIN

Americans DO NOT LET the butthurts interfere with the Trump Administration.

LET'S STAND OUR GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!
.

Nobody ever said the machines were hacked dummy.

I know.

But you and your ilk are implying that Trump's victory is somehow invalid.

.

He worked with the Russians to steal the election. I wonder why people are saying his victory is invalid.

And he "stole" how?

having a better platform does not mean that he "stole" the election

.

 

[Contumacious]

So the election machines weren't hacked. This is not a revelation, nor is it what our intelligence agencies are unanimously blaming Russia for.

What exactly are they blaming them for? There hasn't been an ounce of proof just magical dragon, Alice in wonderland leaps.

Vague accusations in order to discredit Trump's election and his presidency

character assassination

.

Nothing vague about it.

Look for the definition of "vague"

Don't use an Orwellian or Butthurt dictionary


.

 

[healthmyths]

So let's see. The worse case scenario based on the "FACTS"... is Russia TRIED to influence the election of Trump by hacking JUST the DNC and
releasing "harmful" emails that John Podesta had. Does that sound like a fair assessment of the "FACTS" that make it worthy of the USA retaliation by expelling Russian diplomats?
Hmmm... "influencing" the election of Trump....
Hmmm...
Key findings:

• 7 in 10 (69%) voters do not believe the news media are honest and truthful.
• 8 in 10 (78%) of voters believe the news coverage of the presidential campaign was biased, with nearly a 3-to-1 majority believing the media were for Clinton (59%) vs. for Trump (21%).
• Even 1/3 (32%) of Clinton voters believe the media were “pro-Clinton.”
• 8% of Trump voters said they would have voted for Clinton if they had believed what the media were saying about Trump.
• 97% of voters said they did not let the media’s bias influence their vote.
• MRC/YouGov Poll: Most Voters Saw, Rejected News Media Bias

So just to be clear. Wrong for Vlad to try to via "hacking" to bring out stories "BAD" for Hillary...
BUT
it was OK for MSM to as the above key findings try to influence people to vote for Hillary?

 

[Contumacious]

Exactly.

The CIA has been politicized:

"Indeed, that the CIA is not only suddenly involved, but suddenly at the forefront, may well reflect President-elect Trump’s stated policy intentions being far removed from those that the CIA has endorsed, and might be done with an eye toward undermining Trump’s position in those upcoming policy battles."


.

Exactly? Did you not read anything I wrote?

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS FUCKING IRRELEVANT


.

Anything else is irrelevant? Anything else is the ONLY thing that's relevant! Has anybody even been accusing our voter machines and vote counters as having been hacked? You are posting about something that was put to bed weeks ago!

BULLSHIT.

SHOW ME WHERE CLAPPER, THE WHITE OR SENATE DEMOCRATS HAVE MADE THAT DISTINCTION CLEAR.


.


.

The reason this is getting conflated with election results is because the President has taken actions to expel diplomats and levy more sanctions, which requires a serious REASON. He is not saying Russia caused Trump to win. He is saying they TRIED to MEDDLE with our most important election, which is a Big Deal.

They make vague accusations in order to accuse Trump of not winning meritoriously,

in order to disenfranchise his presidency.


.
.

 

[Contumacious]

BULLSHIT.

SHOW ME WHERE CLAPPER, THE WHITE OR SENATE DEMOCRATS HAVE MADE THAT DISTINCTION CLEAR.


.


.

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the fuck you . stop toeing the party line

What are you implying? Sounds like you're saying that the intelligence report was manufactured for political reasons and not based on real intelligence... is that what you think?

THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT" WAS MANUFACTURED

Show me where they say that they have HARD EVIDENCE OF CYBERATTACKS

The "intelligence report" is based on "conclusions"

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

con·clu·sion
kənˈklo͞oZHən/
noun

1. 2.
   a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
   "each research group came to a similar conclusion"
   synonyms: deduction, inference, interpretation, reasoning; More

Just as soon as you get hired to work in the highest classified position in the intelligence network, we will give it to you.

In 1967 I had a Top Secret Cosmic Clearance.


.

 

[Slade3200]

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Yes, the left is trying to take Trump's win away. They would throw him out of office or lock him up if they could. You are full of shit.

Instead of posturing non stop, post the evidence (not OPINION) that Russia hacked the DNC's servers and the email revelations of Democrat corruption swayed the election outcome.

Everything else you say is an attempt to avoid it.

An intelligence report from our top 3 agencies IS evidence and is stronger than the petty partisan opinions and baseless accusations of a Trump overthrow that you spew out. You go ahead with your paranoid conspiracy theories and the majority of us will stick to realistic conversation

 

[Contumacious]

This what the man you fellate , Obama, is accusing the Russians of doing:


CNN: What's Obama's take on all of this?

Obama says he is determined to take action against Russia -- and says Putin is "well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it."
"I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing," he told NPR.

Again, you do not what you are talking about or you are a disinformation agent

.

The White House did not refute that princess. The intelligence report came out YESTERDAY. Your article is from OVER A MONTH AGO.

BULLSHIT


during a secret briefing for congressional leaders, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) voiced doubts about the veracity of the intelligence, according to officials present


The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability."

.

WTF IS THE DEAL WITH YOU AND OBSOLETE ARTICLES THAT ARE OVER A MONTH OLD AND OFF TOPIC?

Don't worry , yesterday's "intelligence report" will be replaced when they find out that no one believed it, hang it there.

.

 

[Iceweasel]

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Yes, the left is trying to take Trump's win away. They would throw him out of office or lock him up if they could. You are full of shit.

Instead of posturing non stop, post the evidence (not OPINION) that Russia hacked the DNC's servers and the email revelations of Democrat corruption swayed the election outcome.

Everything else you say is an attempt to avoid it.

An intelligence report from our top 3 agencies IS evidence and is stronger than the petty partisan opinions and baseless accusations of a Trump overthrow that you spew out. You go ahead with your paranoid conspiracy theories and the majority of us will stick to realistic conversation

You didn't read the question. I asked:

"Instead of posturing non stop, post the evidence (not OPINION) that Russia hacked the DNC's servers and the email revelations of Democrat corruption swayed the election outcome."

 

[Slade3200]

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the fuck you . stop toeing the party line

What are you implying? Sounds like you're saying that the intelligence report was manufactured for political reasons and not based on real intelligence... is that what you think?

THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT" WAS MANUFACTURED

Show me where they say that they have HARD EVIDENCE OF CYBERATTACKS

The "intelligence report" is based on "conclusions"

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

con·clu·sion
kənˈklo͞oZHən/
noun

1. 2.
   a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
   "each research group came to a similar conclusion"
   synonyms: deduction, inference, interpretation, reasoning; More

Page 2 paragraph 6 under key judgements of the report. Did you even read it or are you stuck on Breitbart?

Read the US Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking | Mother Jones

I am looking for HARD EVIDENCE that the Russians hacked our electoral system

I do NOT want to read "conclusions" or :analysis"

Show me the NSA report showing ACTUAL HACKING

I already addressed that and you dodged. My question is, do you think it's a smart idea and in the best interest of our national security to make public an inside asset, whether it be a spy or a tapped line of communication?

Say out loud that you think it's worth compromising this asset to appease your skepticism

 

[hazlnut]

U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

------________

But suddenly they changed their minds, an afterthought, in order to discredit the Trump administration

Me thinks motherfucking Clapper is LYING AGAIN

Americans DO NOT LET the butthurts interfere with the Trump Administration.

LET'S STAND OUR GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!
.

Take your apples and oranges and shove them up your dumb ass.

Russia interfered with out election to Trumps benefit.

Would Trump have won anyway? We'll never know.

But there will forever been an asterisk after his name as President. In every history book going forward, it will say, although Trump won, the results are controversial because of foreign involvement.

The more the dopey hairpiece talks about it and denies, the more people think he what was going to be leaked by wiki before it was leaked.

Remember Guilani?? He knew something was coming down before it happened.

 

[Slade3200]

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

Hell yes they should. Just as they should have released the proof of weapons of mass destruction under W. See where this is going?

So to be clear, if the CIA has a man inside the Russian gov or if they have tapped into their communications you think it's a smart thing to release that information to the public? Do you have any worries about compromising those assets?

After all of the govt lies is iraq war, syria, Benghazi, obamacare, you think I'm going to take them at their word?

Answer my question... you completely dodged it

How do you "tap" cellphones

Are you saying that the Russkies are smart enough to hack out electoral process but do not know how to use VPN?


.

I'm talking about compromising assets, you keep dodging

 

[LordBrownTrout]

U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

------________

But suddenly they changed their minds, an afterthought, in order to discredit the Trump administration

Me thinks motherfucking Clapper is LYING AGAIN

Americans DO NOT LET the butthurts interfere with the Trump Administration.

LET'S STAND OUR GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!
.

Take your apples and oranges and shove them up your dumb ass.

Russia interfered with out election to Trumps benefit.

Would Trump have won anyway? We'll never know.

But there will forever been an asterisk after his name as President. In every history book going forward, it will say, although Trump won, the results are controversial because of foreign involvement.

The more the dopey hairpiece talks about it and denies, the more people think he what was going to be leaked by wiki before it was leaked.

Remember Guilani?? He knew something was coming down before it happened.

You'll lap up any of the govt regurgitated vomit.

 

[OldLady]

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the fuck you . stop toeing the party line

What are you implying? Sounds like you're saying that the intelligence report was manufactured for political reasons and not based on real intelligence... is that what you think?

THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT" WAS MANUFACTURED

Show me where they say that they have HARD EVIDENCE OF CYBERATTACKS

The "intelligence report" is based on "conclusions"

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

con·clu·sion
kənˈklo͞oZHən/
noun

1. 2.
   a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
   "each research group came to a similar conclusion"
   synonyms: deduction, inference, interpretation, reasoning; More

Just as soon as you get hired to work in the highest classified position in the intelligence network, we will give it to you.

In 1967 I had a Top Secret Cosmic Clearance.


.

I suggest you come out of orbit now, dear.
And I don't believe this is an entirely political move. I am upset that any foreign government is stealing and spying on our shit, and I'd like to see them at least get batted back when they're caught. As long as people continue to flatly deny that any of this is true, we won't see improvement in our security. I believe Trump has come to his senses on that. You should check it out.

 

[healthmyths]

U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

------________

But suddenly they changed their minds, an afterthought, in order to discredit the Trump administration

Me thinks motherfucking Clapper is LYING AGAIN

Americans DO NOT LET the butthurts interfere with the Trump Administration.

LET'S STAND OUR GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!
.

Take your apples and oranges and shove them up your dumb ass.

Russia interfered with out election to Trumps benefit.

Would Trump have won anyway? We'll never know.

But there will forever been an asterisk after his name as President. In every history book going forward, it will say, although Trump won, the results are controversial because of foreign involvement.

The more the dopey hairpiece talks about it and denies, the more people think he what was going to be leaked by wiki before it was leaked.

Remember Guilani?? He knew something was coming down before it happened.

How did "Russia interfere" with our election?
What exactly did they do?
Did they try to influence the voters? I would say so!
Did they try to change the vote counts. No.
So by using hacking of private information from John Podesta's emails,etc. they tried to "influence" the election of Trump. Right?
What is the difference between then this:
Hmmm... "influencing" the election of Trump....
Hmmm...
Key findings:
7 in 10 (69%) voters do not believe the news media are honest and truthful.
8 in 10 (78%) of voters believe the news coverage of the presidential campaign was biased, with nearly a 3-to-1 majority believing the media were for Clinton (59%) vs. for Trump (21%).
Even 1/3 (32%) of Clinton voters believe the media were “pro-Clinton.”
8% of Trump voters said they would have voted for Clinton if they had believed what the media were saying about Trump.
97% of voters said they did not let the media’s bias influence their vote.
MRC/YouGov Poll: Most Voters Saw, Rejected News Media Bias
So just to be clear.
Wrong for Russia to try via "hacking" to bring out stories "BAD" for Hillary...
BUT
it was OK for MSM to as the above key findings try to influence people to vote for Hillary?